General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFOOD. That's the one word I just can't get past. FOOD.
It's so damnably heartless. Food is not an entitlement. It is necessary to life itself.
But I guess it would add more jobs to the economy - I imagined there would be a lot of lifeless, starved, unsheltered bodies to pick up and destroy in Mitt's insane worldview.
Food. I just can't get past that one single word.
Food.
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)I bet even his $50,000 a plate audience was shocked by that one.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)Plus google
6502
(249 posts)Last edited Tue Sep 18, 2012, 01:46 PM - Edit history (1)
... they are true believers all of them. That's why they paid the $50,000 per plate.
The are the 7 Deadly Sins in flesh.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021369526
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)So contemptuous. Just dripping with loathing for peasants who expect food.
Unreal. He kicked my loathing of him into high gear.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)He's done.
The Wielding Truth
(11,411 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)Good for school children. I'm not making that up.
jillan
(39,451 posts)bongbong
(5,436 posts)> the one comment that burns my butt over everything else he said
Flip-Flopper has said SO MANY wretched things it's actually hard to rank them. Don't forget that just in the excerpt du jour, he also said he could get elected if he was "Mexican".
America can't get much lower than it is right now from this assault by Tax-Evader Rmoney & the rest of the repigs.
Shrike47
(6,913 posts)I'll never understand why they think starving children is good.
slampoet
(5,032 posts)It really is a Red State beneficial program.
justice1
(795 posts)slampoet
(5,032 posts)when i was in school.
Even the kids that think they paid really don't recall that even that full price was subsidized for EVERYONE even visitors.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)higher property taxes so ALL school meals are free. I was on the luch program growing up, and there is a bit of a stigma about. If all were fed for free the stigma would be gone.
ncgrits
(916 posts)every day and you bought a new one each week. And one day, in first grade, I noticed that my friend Esther's ticket was a different color than mine and those of my friends. She and I both wondered about that--we were 6 years old and didn't have a clue. Later that day, at dinner, I mentioned that to my mother and she "wondered" about it too. . . .
Years later (when I was in college) my mother and I were talking about Esther who had gone on to be a P.A. and had cared for my dad in a recent hospitalization. . . . And Mama remembered the lunch tickets. She told me she had gone in to see the principal and asked him why Esther's free lunch card had to be a different color. He didn't have an answer and changed it that very day--all the lunch tickets were the same from then on.
God bless my sweet mother. She passed away in 1992. I miss her still.
NEOhiodemocrat
(912 posts)For her to take action like that so the free lunch cards were not different, that shows a very caring soul.
justice1
(795 posts)awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)that the cashier kept. Only us on the free meal plan were on the list. Everyone knew it. I only ate lunch half the time.
Patiod
(11,816 posts)Her father was a drunk, and in jail at one point, and wouldn't allow her mom to work. She said that school breakfast and lunch were the only meals she and her 5 brothers got all week.
Thanks to public schools, public colleges and these lunch programs, she and her brothers are now solid, tax-paying citizens.
And of course she's a Republican. She was a hard-working person who "pulled herself out of poverty" and "scrimped and saved" to get where she is, but unlike her, other people are just spendthrifts who don't deserve any help (and neither do their kids). I have never had the guts to say "a lot of people probably thought that about your family because your dad brought all that trouble on himself with his own bad decisions, so they probably thought your family probably didn't "deserve" help either".
Moostache
(9,895 posts)I have ZERO patience for people who benefited from the benevolence of government programs themselves turn their backs on it as if once THEIR needs were met then everyone else can go pound sand. FUCK HER and her warped priorities and self-talk portrait of herself as the "self-made man". Without FOOD programs it sounds like she would have been lucky to survive adolescence...to then have such low regard for others suffering the same or worse fate is EVIL.
Give me her address/phone number/e-mail address and I will GLADLY set her straight with ZERO issue or worry about hurting her feelings...what you describe, if accurate, is a sub-human scumbag that deserves to relive a little horror from her life to slap her out of this self-worshiping delusion that she did it all by her own hard work...
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)at home. The freebie lunch people (where I went) were kept on a list. Only free lunch people were on it. I skipped lunch half the time, because I didn't like standing out.
AnneD
(15,774 posts)but the lunch program has it's roots in the depression and WWII. Soldiers that were drafted were found to be suffering the diseases of malnutrition. In part, in order to have a physically fit pool of soldiers and regulate crop prices, the school lunch program was born. It was a win-win.
With the current economic crisis and food shortage, this program is so critical. Just ask the local food banks about the summer months and hunger in children.
Poll_Blind
(23,864 posts)...my eyes were moving over the words and I heard him speak them. Food. Food. IIRC, it's not like he glosses over it either, when he's saying it. Food.
Seriously, you must check out this article just posted by WillPitt from NYMag. The short article is titled "The Real Romney Captured on Tape Turns Out to Be a Sneering Plutocrat" and so worth the time to read.
PB
Jeff In Milwaukee
(13,992 posts)It's really an insight into the world they want to create. They want to go back to the 19th century.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)He told how young Chinese girls worked there, for pennies, and lived in dormitories. These young women work to save money to get married then eventually leave. The factory was surrounded by a fence and barbed wire and when Mitt asked why, the factory owner said it's to keep people out, not people in. He said that people by the hundreds line up wanting a job.
Mittens was exciteded about this, and said that Americans would never do that....and in my head, I am convinced that's how he and his rich buddies want all of us to be - poor, desperate, and begging to work for pennies just so we can eat.
The rich and the rest of us, who mean nothing.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)AzDar
(14,023 posts)He's vile.
KurtNYC
(14,549 posts)real fascist stuff. His creepy lust to control and exploit young women. Mitt's admiration for their prison labor system.
And then to say in effect that veterans including those who lost limbs in service of this country with all its abundance, are not "entitled to food" !
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)The more of an empire we are becoming, the more need for slave labor to hold onto it.
Mitt understands that very well.
It is hard to be high and mighty if you have no one to look down upon.
woodsprite
(11,902 posts)fasttense
(17,301 posts)I don't buy it for a minute. Those guards were there to make sure those girls worked and did nothing else while they were locked away in dorms stacked 3 high.
Yeah Romney would love to do that to Americans.
treestar
(82,383 posts)The fences are to keep people out? Please. That is how they want us to be - begging them to work for practically nothing.
He was using that to underscore his claim that anyone born in the US has it made. Well he did, but that doesn't mean everybody. And when some of us were working for him for as little as possible, then he moved the factory to China, so why does that prove his point? It doesn't.
ananda
(28,833 posts)nt
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)DonRedwood
(4,359 posts)food is not something all Americans should have.
randome
(34,845 posts)Die-hard Republicans will just point out that he meant everyone should PAY for food. Completely overlooking the poor, of course, but logic is not in fashion for Republicans.
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)I used to volunteer at a food pantry and got lots of donations from wealthy, conservative individuals and organizations, especially churches. Nobody thinks starvation and malnutrition are ok if one can't afford food. Now, right wingers may prefer the poor to hit the pantries rather than get food stamps, but regardless they don't want kids and seniors going hungry.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)Obama supporters.
I've said it before and I'll keep saying it: THEY WANT US DEAD.
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)or volunteer in a Meals on Wheels facility. And the truth is that a lot of the desperately poor vote against their best interests due to social issues.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)because apparently they'd be willing to be witness to the slow death by starvation of their fellow Americans if those Americans were out of cash. That's hard hearted.
Romeny's own Dad grew up living on 'refugee benefits' provided by the taxpayers of America. We, the People, did not question their need for food, we just fed the Romeny family and clothed them and housed them because they were unable to do those things for themselves.
randome
(34,845 posts)I can just see how they will spin it by saying he meant 'People want food without having to PAY for it.'
Again, completely overlooking the plight of poor, including children. The most damning part of his 'conversation' with the rich is that he has shown how completely inadequate as a politician he is. A good politician would know better how to hide the truth.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)and ill.
I have friends in their 50s with debilitating cancers. They have to take medicines that disable them to the point that they cannot work. No employer would want to risk having them at work.
I also have friends with serious mental illness -- not all of them from poor families. They cannot work. They cannot get jobs.
randome
(34,845 posts)Romney has shown himself to be completely tone deaf when it comes to politics.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)His base won't be swayed regardless. However, I do think that much can be made of it for those sitting on the fence. And it makes for great negative branding too.
NYC Liberal
(20,135 posts)He's saying the poor should just starve.
librechik
(30,673 posts)If you ignore all facts about the economy and who the recession is affecting and how.
It's racist, it's moronic, and it follows very closely the elaborate hateful philosophy the RW encourages in its followers.
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)Entitled to food? WTF?
What a soulless bastard.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)is how that read to me. Another Marie Antoinette "Let them eat cake" moment, except he isn't even suggesting cake.
Chorophyll
(5,179 posts)I mean, the entire spew was beyond repugnant. But FOOD. This is someone who can look at a starving infant and not feel anything. Unreal.
VWolf
(3,944 posts)KurtNYC
(14,549 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(48,939 posts)silvershadow
(10,336 posts)I got a raise of $40 or something last year on my disability. Just enough to push me over the limit on eligibility...They reduced my monthly food stamps from $200 down to $16. That's right, $16. Hardly worth the hassle of the constant hassle of paperwork and phone calls necessary to make sure that $16 keeps coming (which is what they want). Yes, food. Tell me about it.
iwillalwayswonderwhy
(2,601 posts)WTF is going on in this country?
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)are able to squeeze out some to help me, thank God. I also am still able to garden. Last year it was to help me out, this year I gardened out of necessity. Next year I will have to plant a fall garden as well for the first time. But I am making it. Thanks again.
PatSeg
(47,239 posts)from other people on disability. It appears to be a common problem. Crazy.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)money up somewhere. In March or April I hit the donut hole, and had to start paying on medical bills too. It has been a rough year for me.
PatSeg
(47,239 posts)to what a few people have told me, right down to the about $16 in food stamps. Actually I know of at least one person whose food stamps were reduced to exactly $16 and the math just didn't make any sense.
hamsterjill
(15,220 posts)I just posted a similar comment in another thread. It was simply chilling to me that he thinks people are not entitled to food.
Cold bastard.
BOG PERSON
(2,916 posts)(step 1) increases competition in the labor market
(step 2) thereby putting downward pressure on remuneration
(step 3) thereby putting more people back to work (for less!)
iwillalwayswonderwhy
(2,601 posts)I think he just might be insane.
TheKentuckian
(25,018 posts)I wouldn't vote for that piece of shit for Toilet Scrubber, Third Class.
MissNostalgia
(159 posts)There is so much that I have taken from Romney's comments. Absolutely this man thinks no one is entitled to food, but not only just that but CLEAN food, water, and air.In Romney's & overall Republican's minds the middle class,females, poor, sick, disabled and/or those with melanin are expendable in the worst way.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)breathable air and drinkable water.
Nervy, entitled little folk, aren't we?
iwillalwayswonderwhy
(2,601 posts)That it makes me a bit teary even thinking that there are people who think this way.
PatSeg
(47,239 posts)When is it alright to begrudge anyone FOOD? I guess those 47-48% think they are actually entitled to live as well. Such nerve!
frylock
(34,825 posts)neeksgeek
(1,214 posts)But food? FOOD is an entitlement? So what is his plan for the starving?
I think I know. Let them starve, maybe let them go get a bowl of gruel, if they attend a faith-based program... All this is very bad.
Or is he planning to outsource the soup kitchens too?
MadrasT
(7,237 posts)The fucking audacity of that arrogant buffoon.
He wants to be president of a country and doesn't care if its citizens starve.
What the everloving fucking kind of bullshittery is that?
It is astounding to me.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)"Let them starve; I've got mine."
iwillalwayswonderwhy
(2,601 posts)'At this festive season of the year, Mr Scrooge,' said the gentleman, taking up a pen, 'it is more than usually desirable that we should make some slight provision for the Poor and destitute, who suffer greatly at the present time. Many thousands are in want of common necessaries; hundreds of thousands are in want of common comforts, sir.'
'Are there no prisons?"
'Plenty of prisons,' said the gentleman, laying down the pen again.
'And the Union workhouses.' demanded Scrooge. 'Are they still in operation?'
'Both very busy, sir.'
'Oh. I was afraid, from what you said at first, that something had occurred to stop them in their useful course,' said Scrooge. 'I'm very glad to hear it.'
Cleita
(75,480 posts)children. Neither demography are able to be responsible for themselves. I'm beginning to think this guy is stupid. It makes you wonder how those who have those degrees from Harvard get them. I'm beginning to think that a Harvard degree is worth no more than one from a diploma mill. I mean Bush and now Romney?
rwsanders
(2,594 posts)Why does the Repugnant party hate America so much?
Its too bad that more isn't taught in schools about FDR and how he proposed a second bill of rights that would have guaranteed those things for everyone.
iwillalwayswonderwhy
(2,601 posts)Jesus preached to HELP the poor, not to show arrogance and disdain and disgust to the poor.
valerief
(53,235 posts)high taxes and shut their traps.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)People don't starve to death peacefully.
The guillotines came out in Paris because the people were starving. And it wasn't the poor people getting their heads lopped off. Similar things happened in revolutions all around the world.
You'd think the rich would be smart enough to realize that feeding the poor isn't just the right thing to do, it also keeps the rich alive.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)to survive.
sad sally
(2,627 posts)WestWisconsinDem
(127 posts)If you don't agree with Mittens, you don't even deserve to live. With every massing day, the Evil that is Mitt Romney becomes more apparent.
rbnyc
(17,045 posts)Odin2005
(53,521 posts)RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)Heartless bastard!
Food is not an entitlement.
People in the US can starve before Willard the Rat will help them.
He can go pound salt into a rat hole.
kentuck
(111,051 posts)NO, you cant have any more gruel !!
Blue Owl
(50,238 posts)n/t
RevStPatrick
(2,208 posts)...and remember, Mr. Romney is a BISHOP in his church... these uber-religious Jesusy and Brighamy types are so much more Darwinist "survival of the fittest" than any "evolutionist" has ever been.
People like Mr. Romney, seriously and without any doubt what-so-ever, want those who haven't successfully played the "survival of the fittest" game to FUCKING DIE ALREADY!!! They want the planet to themselves, and in their minds it's the little green pieces of paper and metal coins and positive numbers on the spreadsheets that represent "survival of the fittest." In my experience, people who are "evolutionists" tend to be much more empathetic.
I really didn't think that I could possibly get any more disgusted by Mr. Romney's behavior than after what happened last week when he "shot first and aimed later." But this latest episode is just... so... yuck... I don't even know what to call it. I do know, that if this disgusting creature were to somehow end up in the Oval, I and so many others would take to the streets and shut this whole fucker down...
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)And guess which part we play in that scenario!
subterranean
(3,427 posts)He could have said something like "45 percent of voters are going to support President Obama no matter what. And about 45 percent will vote Republican no matter what. My job is not to worry about those people. My job is to convince the 10 percent in the middle." and left it at that. That's what a smart politician would have said. That would have been understandable. But no, he had to go and insult Obama supporters and say that they're all irresponsible parasites who don't pay taxes and think they're entitled to free food, housing and health care and refuse to take personal responsibility for their lives.
My question is, did he say this because it's what he really thinks, or just because he thought it would go over well with this small audience of wealthy donors? I'm not sure which is worse.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)After Katrina the Bush Administration was astonished to discover they were obligated BY LAW to evacuate and take care of disaster victims for FREE.
Remember when the Right Wing was claiming anyone who didn't comply with the evacuation order should be arrested? It doesn't work that way.
demwing
(16,916 posts)Romney Antoinette, as it were
PA Democrat
(13,225 posts)food stamps are one of the most stimulative forms of government spending.
The report found that "some provide a lot of bang for the buck to the economy. Others ... don't," said economist Mark Zandi.
In findings echoed by other economists and studies, he said the study shows the fastest way to infuse money into the economy is through expanding the food-stamp program. For every dollar spent on that program $1.73 is generated throughout the economy, he said.
"If someone who is literally living paycheck to paycheck gets an extra dollar, it's very likely that they will spend that dollar immediately on whatever they need - groceries, to pay the telephone bill, to pay the electric bill," he said.
http://money.cnn.com/2008/01/29/news/economy/stimulus_analysis/index.htm
Matariki
(18,775 posts)I think it's a deliberate equating of 'taking from the government' with the entitlement programs of Social Security and Medicare. A big pile of money (we've all paid in to) that Romney and his pals would just love to raid.