General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWTF, Gallup Obama 47, Romney 46! This after Libya???
Obama down a point, Romney up a point.
Jesus, what is the deal?
madaboutharry
(40,208 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts).
liberallibral
(272 posts)I know, it's crazy... but it's true...
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)And Obama is trading at 68% at intrade and 3-1 at the betting sites.
Jennicut
(25,415 posts)NBC/Wall St. Journal poll will be out tonight and per some tweets from Nbc news and even Chuckie Todd there is some positive movement for Obama on certain poll questions.
A tracking poll lead is nice but look at the swing state #'s first. Electoral college is most important. Another poll for VA today by Washington Post is Obama +8. Tracking polls are popular vote #'s and in that case, it has always been close.
VA poll: http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-politics/post-poll-obama-up-8-points-over-romney-in-virginia/2012/09/18/ca691d9a-0193-11e2-9367-4e1bafb958db_story.html
Tweets on NBC/Wall St. Journal Poll: http://twitter.com/mmurraypolitics
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts).
Jennicut
(25,415 posts)At least 3% or more, which falls in line with all the other polls but Gallup and Rasmussen. The tracking polls are fun to watch but the daily bounces can drive some people nuts. The lead on Gallup was a convention bounce but the leads in the swing states are more damaging to Romney. Hard to find a way to win for him without VA, OH, and FL.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts).
DonViejo
(60,536 posts)former9thward
(31,981 posts)Although I'll never county my chicks before the eggs hatch, don't worry about the polls. It all depends where they are being conducted, not to mention that they are estimates/opinions that are not written in stone.
alfredo
(60,071 posts)to the right, others don't.
I look at aggregates and trends. I also look at where the votes are. Obama has a very healthy lead in the race for 270.
I like Nate Silver's blog. http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com
He is now showing the Senate race. If the election was held today, the Dems would hold the Senate.
If Romney really crashes and burns, that will either help us in Congress, or it will mean more Republican resources for the Congressional races. A Romney death spiral could depress Republican votes across the board.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Those fucking assclowns don't fool me.
cali
(114,904 posts)Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)It's unfair. It's crazy! I don't understand it at all, but the American people are stupid. They are misinformed. They just are.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts).
ProSense
(116,464 posts)http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021362031
There is absolutely no reason for Romney's numbers to be climbing. Usually polls react to good and bad news, here Romney is being roundly criticized by everyone, including Republicans, and his numbers are going up?
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)react negatively to Romney, they may still be leery about what's going on in the Middle East, thus the decline in Obama's number. It doesn't surprise me at all. I have little faith in the intelligence of the American electorate. We Democrats underestimate the voting electorate at our peril.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"I have little faith in the intelligence of the American electorate. We Democrats underestimate the voting electorate at our peril."
Republicans wan't us to think the majority of voting Americans are stupid when in fact, the only time Republicans win is if they cheat. Americans were smart enough to reject them in 2006 and in 2008. The 2010 was more a result of lack of enthusiasm on the part of Democrats.
What 2006 and 2008 proved is that hard fought campaigns to get the truth and the vote out can overcome Republican distortions and election tampering.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)People are irrational. They are driven by emotion, how they feel. There's also this issue of the average American being too busy to keep up with politics the way we do. Even very intelligent people are susceptible to soundbites and slogans because they don't have time to sift through all the information. I just think we do ourselves a disservice when we fail to acknowledge this fact. Corruption, Bush fatigue, and the war gave the Democrats 2006. The crash of the economy and Bush/McCain ineptness, Obama's appeal and a greatly run campaign with strong coattails gave us 2008.
Misinformation, apathy, lies propagated from the Right bolstered by a complicit and lazy Corporate Media, dissatisfaction, impatience and misplaced blame led to our loss in 2010.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)The "Low Infos" that only read/hear the headlines first reaction will be to blame the President for most anything that goes wrong. However, over time once the situation has stabilized then the President also gets credit for keeping it from getting worse.
Barack_America
(28,876 posts)Larger picture
http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)and who is more likely to get polled on the weekend versus weekdays.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)The Romney campaign is self destructing, they've seen the internals and know they can't win.
KharmaTrain
(31,706 posts)I've been seeing plenty of posts around here from people ready to spike the football and put a fork in Bishop Willard and the rushpublicans. Maybe this will be a wake up call that there are still 49 very rough and tough days ahead. These goons have millions still ready to spend with plenty of lies and no hesitation to use them. There's still a lot of heavy lifting to be done...phones to ring, doors to knock on and people to register and get to the polls.
Remember, it's the state polls that matter...270 electoral votes...not national popularity numbers.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)The larger the pop vote margin the larger the EC margin and more likely they won't diverge.
KharmaTrain
(31,706 posts)Gallup and the others are snapshots of a political mood but not one that reflects what's going on inside state races. If the popular vote mattered we would have had President Gore.
Cheers...
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Obama wins popular vote but loses electoral college 3.2%
Romney wins popular vote but loses electoral college 1.9%
http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/
Those seem like rather small odds and I suspect they get even lower as the popular vote increases.
I get the fact that there are fifty state races. But I also get the fact that Candidate X is not going to win the pop vote by a margin of more than a percentage point or so, which represents over a million voters, and lose the EC.
That hasn't happened since in the Tilden-Hayes election...
KharmaTrain
(31,706 posts)...if the election were thrown to the House to be decided. The corporate media would short-circuit from their own orgasms.
I'm hoping people get concerned by tight popularity poll numbers...as I said above, I was seeing too many here who think this election is a done deal. It isn't and the hardest work lies ahead.
Cheers...
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)who didn't turn out to vote in 2010. The assumption is that if you didn't vote then you are less likely to vote now.
That computer model won't work very well this time around.
former9thward
(31,981 posts)RepublicansRZombies
(982 posts)It's all about manufacturing consent.
gcomeau
(5,764 posts)Obama's post convention high polling days are dropping off the 7 day average now and we're just getting into the period where these latest developments will start being reflected. It's one day. You get worried if it lasts a week or two.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)To get a real feel for the race you need to look at all the state and nat'l polls as well as the betting sites and there Obama is doing quite well...
Also, which campaign is constantly on their heels.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Obama, as does any suggestion of failure the ongoing operations or the start of new wars. America is sick of wars in the Mideast, North Africa and South Asia.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)But it's beyond silly to just look at one poll.
Statisticians like Nate Silver and Sam Wang nail almost all elections, at every level, by averaging all of them.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)unless it gives the neocons -- or more precisely, those influenced by them -- pause to think about the potential of more blowback from regime change operations.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)It looks like the world is in flames though it's a small part of the world and a relatively small percentage of people are participating.
Would Romney trade his hand for the president's hand in this election?
You betcha.
Zalatix
(8,994 posts)Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)that it is even within 15 points sickens me about this country.
RedStateLiberal
(1,374 posts)Not like we do, so don't fret about the popular vote polls.
What really matters is electoral votes and Obama has it in the bag at this point.
Just look at this map that excludes Rasmussen polls:
http://electoral-vote.com/evp2012/Pres/Maps/Sep18-noras.html
Even if Rmoney manages to swing all the states that are currently 'Barely Dem' he doesn't have enough EVs to win. He would also need one of the states that are currently 'Likely Dem'.
With the damage he's done to his own campaign, I cannot even imagine a scenario where he could reverse the trend that is showing a landslide victory for Obama.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)They do everything to create the impression that Romney's foot-in-mouth isn't that bad. Frankly, this is going to work. They may succeed in confusing a few people each time, but the momentum is on the President's side and most polls show he's solidifying support among Democrats and winning over independents. He has completely erased Mitt's only advantange on the economy, which was the result of hype to begin with.
WooWooWoo
(454 posts)any poll that doesn't have either Romney or Obama up by 5 or more....
is meaningless. Otherwise it's all within the margin of error.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)If you have ten polls and the average of those polls show Candidate X with a four point lead it's a mathematical certainty that Candidate X is in the lead and not all ten polls are wrong.
The more polls, the more numbers, the more robust the findings.
just1voice
(1,362 posts)That's the deal.
WI_DEM
(33,497 posts)ahead?
still_one
(92,138 posts)Very much for the citizens of this country.
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)RainbowOverTexas
(71 posts)Obama was up by 7 in gallup and 5 in rasmussen a week ago. I guess the convention bounce is gone.
Zalatix
(8,994 posts)These polls show just how thick the hull of the Good Ship Obama is. Or how powerful his guns are as he takes shots at Rmoney.
Rmoney has totally squandered away his opportunities.
renie408
(9,854 posts)I have been hearing all along how tight a race this was going to be and how Romney was going to walk over Obama. Most people, even people here, thought that the economy would tank Obama. While I personally cannot believe he is not leading by 53 points, a 3 point lead is pretty good with the economic baggage Obama is dragging behind him.
I wish polls would shift more for Obama, but these are early days yet. And there is no reason to think that Romney is just going to miraculously get his shit together. He has to manage SEVEN MORE WEEKS without screwing up. Because make no mistake, the past eight days have taken their toll. He is using up any leeway for mistakes he may have had rapidly.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)The effects of eight percent unemployment are more concentrated and more painful for those unemployed but it's not the same.
Also, the stock market has doubled under Obama. It was flat under Carter.
And there's no hostage situation ...
WI_DEM
(33,497 posts)inflation was high, today's it low. Interest rates were high. Today they are relatively low. The Stock Market sucked. Today it's doing well. Unemployment is high now but is going in the right direction. When Carter ran in 1980 it was going up.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)The economy was much worse in 1980 and historians pretty much have concluded what really broke that race wide open was the realization the hostages weren't coming back.
Zalatix
(8,994 posts)The entire GOP has completely taken a dump on women's rights. That alone should have been an extinction-level blunder.
RainbowOverTexas
(71 posts)Carter was up on Reagan like 8 points pre debates. If Obama's hull is strong, Carter was unsinkable.
WI_DEM
(33,497 posts)and Gallup goes back a week so yeah, it could include Libya.
still_one
(92,138 posts)Romney the women, poor, and middle class will be screwed for decades! And I hate to say it, they will deserve it
WI_DEM
(33,497 posts)still_one
(92,138 posts)WI_DEM
(33,497 posts)still_one
(92,138 posts)correct
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Seven polls, six showing O in the lead, and this was before Willard told half the nation to drop dead.
WI_DEM
(33,497 posts)Butterbean
(1,014 posts)a very comfortable lead in '08. Or maybe that was just my own perception that McCain was such an undesirable, non-viable candidate. *shrug*
BlueinOhio
(238 posts)That is all needed to cheat at the polls with the electronic voting machines.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)This is a state by state battle, and Obama is winning it.