Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

theaocp

(4,236 posts)
Sun Aug 2, 2020, 11:25 AM Aug 2020

From 9/11 to Portland, it was inevitable 'Homeland Security' would be turned on the American people

Even in the hazy, flag-waving days surrounding the Sept. 11, 2001 terror attack on the United States, there was something about America’s rush to create a massive state apparatus called the Department of Homeland Security that made some people’s skin crawl — and not just the usual patchouli-scented, granola-sated leftist suspects.

“The word ‘homeland’ is a strange word,” George W. Bush’s Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld told staffers in a memo after some floated the idea of combining federal functions around immigration, customs, domestic intelligence, and law enforcement into one vast department even before 9/11. “‘Homeland’ Defense sounds more German than American.”

The USA had functioned just fine for 226 years without a Department of Homeland Security, and the decision to create DHS was never cast in stone. Even the hawkish Bush administration wasn’t sure it was needed — politically, the pressure came from centrist Democrats like former Connecticut Sen. Joe Lieberman eager to show their post-9/11 cojones. Yet once planted in the ground, DHS has grown wildly like choking, invasive kudzu, causing even the libertarian, Koch-Brothers-funded Cato Institute to call it wasteful and declare “Americans are not safer.”

Donald Rumsfeld was very wrong about many, many things — remember the WMD east and west and south and north of Baghdad? — but his qualms about a homeland-security state on U.S. soil were right on the money. The bureaucratic waste and the nation’s failure to confront its real threats from stronger hurricanes to a global pandemic have been bad enough. But the real risk of creating a state-security force was that it would follow the beaten-down jackbooted pathway of every state security force before it and get turned against the American people.


Read more: https://www.inquirer.com/opinion/portland-protests-abolish-homeland-security-dhs-911-20200730.html
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
From 9/11 to Portland, it was inevitable 'Homeland Security' would be turned on the American people (Original Post) theaocp Aug 2020 OP
The homeland of the USA is England that's why it's so jarring Blues Heron Aug 2020 #1
trDumpie won't be the last Fascist at the helm. magicarpet Aug 2020 #2
Thank the Neocon's. nt Hotler Aug 2020 #3
I think it was created moondust Aug 2020 #4

moondust

(19,972 posts)
4. I think it was created
Sun Aug 2, 2020, 12:12 PM
Aug 2020

as a reaction to different agencies being too independent and not sharing intelligence; as such they failed to prevent the 9/11 attacks. I suppose it was assumed they would work together better if they were under the same administrative roof. At the time many knew it was not a good idea to consolidate so much, especially under a rather authoritarian-sounding name.

There probably was and still is a better solution.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»From 9/11 to Portland, it...