Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFrom 9/11 to Portland, it was inevitable 'Homeland Security' would be turned on the American people
Even in the hazy, flag-waving days surrounding the Sept. 11, 2001 terror attack on the United States, there was something about Americas rush to create a massive state apparatus called the Department of Homeland Security that made some peoples skin crawl and not just the usual patchouli-scented, granola-sated leftist suspects.
The word homeland is a strange word, George W. Bushs Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld told staffers in a memo after some floated the idea of combining federal functions around immigration, customs, domestic intelligence, and law enforcement into one vast department even before 9/11. Homeland Defense sounds more German than American.
The USA had functioned just fine for 226 years without a Department of Homeland Security, and the decision to create DHS was never cast in stone. Even the hawkish Bush administration wasnt sure it was needed politically, the pressure came from centrist Democrats like former Connecticut Sen. Joe Lieberman eager to show their post-9/11 cojones. Yet once planted in the ground, DHS has grown wildly like choking, invasive kudzu, causing even the libertarian, Koch-Brothers-funded Cato Institute to call it wasteful and declare Americans are not safer.
Donald Rumsfeld was very wrong about many, many things remember the WMD east and west and south and north of Baghdad? but his qualms about a homeland-security state on U.S. soil were right on the money. The bureaucratic waste and the nations failure to confront its real threats from stronger hurricanes to a global pandemic have been bad enough. But the real risk of creating a state-security force was that it would follow the beaten-down jackbooted pathway of every state security force before it and get turned against the American people.
The word homeland is a strange word, George W. Bushs Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld told staffers in a memo after some floated the idea of combining federal functions around immigration, customs, domestic intelligence, and law enforcement into one vast department even before 9/11. Homeland Defense sounds more German than American.
The USA had functioned just fine for 226 years without a Department of Homeland Security, and the decision to create DHS was never cast in stone. Even the hawkish Bush administration wasnt sure it was needed politically, the pressure came from centrist Democrats like former Connecticut Sen. Joe Lieberman eager to show their post-9/11 cojones. Yet once planted in the ground, DHS has grown wildly like choking, invasive kudzu, causing even the libertarian, Koch-Brothers-funded Cato Institute to call it wasteful and declare Americans are not safer.
Donald Rumsfeld was very wrong about many, many things remember the WMD east and west and south and north of Baghdad? but his qualms about a homeland-security state on U.S. soil were right on the money. The bureaucratic waste and the nations failure to confront its real threats from stronger hurricanes to a global pandemic have been bad enough. But the real risk of creating a state-security force was that it would follow the beaten-down jackbooted pathway of every state security force before it and get turned against the American people.
Read more: https://www.inquirer.com/opinion/portland-protests-abolish-homeland-security-dhs-911-20200730.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 480 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
From 9/11 to Portland, it was inevitable 'Homeland Security' would be turned on the American people (Original Post)
theaocp
Aug 2020
OP
Blues Heron
(5,931 posts)1. The homeland of the USA is England that's why it's so jarring
sounds Orewellian, always has.
magicarpet
(14,144 posts)2. trDumpie won't be the last Fascist at the helm.
(Think Sen. Cotton.)
Hotler
(11,420 posts)3. Thank the Neocon's. nt
moondust
(19,972 posts)4. I think it was created
as a reaction to different agencies being too independent and not sharing intelligence; as such they failed to prevent the 9/11 attacks. I suppose it was assumed they would work together better if they were under the same administrative roof. At the time many knew it was not a good idea to consolidate so much, especially under a rather authoritarian-sounding name.
There probably was and still is a better solution.