Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,980 posts)
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 05:35 PM Sep 2012

National Review PHOTOSHOPS Obama For It's October Cover

NATIONAL REVIEW


THE ORIGINAL



UPDATE: Todd Sumlin writes: “I am a photographer at The Charlotte Observer. I was on the photo platform directly behind the President at the Democratic National Convention. Attached is a photo from that same angle. As you can see, the posters the North Carolina delegates are holding were changed from ‘Forward’ to ‘Abortion.’”

http://jimromenesko.com/2012/09/20/national-review-by-the-way-our-obama-cover-was-altered/?fb_comment_id=fbc_411096378949756_3946626_411188252273902#f3d07ed14f0769

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

SomethingFishy

(4,876 posts)
4. Bwhahahahahaha
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 05:55 PM
Sep 2012

Romney's getting killed on every issue so they are back to the old standby Abortion. Lose.

MagickMuffin

(15,933 posts)
5. The photographer should sue, just like Shepard Fairey got sued for using an unauthorized image of ..
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 05:56 PM
Sep 2012

Candidate Obama.

Sue Todd, Sue!

Guy Whitey Corngood

(26,500 posts)
8. The Nation should have one with Mittfalca's crowd holding up "RAPE" signs. But then again
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 06:01 PM
Sep 2012

The Nation is a real magazine

 

HopeHoops

(47,675 posts)
10. Not the same angle. Rotate about 30 degrees (to your right) and you've got the Photoshop angle.
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 06:24 PM
Sep 2012

The woman in the Uncle Sam hat (just to his right in the Photoshop with the guy in the white suit) is much more to the left in the original. The guy in the black shirt to his left (front row) in the Photoshop is at the far left of the original. The man behind him and the woman to his left (his left, not photograph left) both wearing yellow shirts are visible in both shots.

It's also a really amateur Photoshop job. Whoever did that one should be fired for incompetence. Then again, maybe $1.98/hr is all they could afford to pay for someone to monkey around with a mouse.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»National Review PHOTOSHOP...