Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

bayareamike

(602 posts) Fri Sep 21, 2012, 03:35 PM Sep 2012

Mitt's Son Signed Abortion Clause (Mitt covered the expenses) Reports TMZ

Just heard on Randi Rhodes' show that Tagg Romney signed an abortion clause in the contract for the surrogate mother of his two kids. Also, Mitt covered the expenses. Can we say hypocrite?

http://www.tmz.com/2012/09/20/mitt-romney-son-tagg-abortion-clause-surrogate-birth-agreement-contract-bill-handel/

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Mitt's Son Signed Abortion Clause (Mitt covered the expenses) Reports TMZ (Original Post) bayareamike Sep 2012 OP

Cons aren't against abortion - as long as it's for themselves. BlueCaliDem Sep 2012 #1

Their attorney claims JimDandy Sep 2012 #2

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)

1. Cons aren't against abortion - as long as it's for themselves.

Reply to bayareamike (Original post)

Fri Sep 21, 2012, 03:37 PM

Sep 2012

The other women aren't worthy of freedom to choose.

Yes, I'll say it - HYPOCRITES!

JimDandy

(7,318 posts)

2. Their attorney claims

Reply to bayareamike (Original post)

Fri Sep 21, 2012, 04:04 PM

Sep 2012

that not removing that clause from the standardized contract they used was an oversight and that, when they used the same surrogate back in 2009, the abotion clause HAD been removed. Tidy explanation, but it still makes me go 'hmmmm'.

Reply to this discussion