General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsScott Brown's comments disputing Elizabeth Warren's native heritage, really pissed me off.
Scott Brown challenged the claim that Elizabeth Warren is part Cherokee, during last night's Boston debate for a closely watched race for a key Massachusetts Senate seat. "As you know ... Professor Warren has claimed she is a Native American, a person of color. As you can see, she is not," Brown said in their first of four TV debates before the November 6 election. Meaning what? She isn't dark enough to have Native ancestors? This whole line of questioning had me so insulted. Funny, he didn't look like a hateful person, but Scott Brown sure sounded like one last night, by saying something so idiotic and childish. Pretty sure isn't everything, is it?
Warren responded simply, that she was told as a child that her mother had Native American ancestry: "When I was growing up, these are the stories I knew about my heritage, I never asked anybody for any documentation. I don't know any kid who did." She is not uncommon in her assertion. Most of us only have oral histories from older family members to rely on, mostly because our families have more than a few generations separating them from an immigrant ancestor. Read More
spanone
(135,795 posts)what can you expect
handmade34
(22,756 posts)comment by Brown... I was livid!
riverwalker
(8,694 posts)HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)as a minority & if that helped smooth her hiring + helped harvard meet its eeo quotas...
The Boston Herald has been going after Warren for identifying herself as "Native American" while she was a professor at Harvard Law School (she's currently on leave) and for listing herself in the Association of American Law Schools' annual directory as a minority professor due to her American Indian heritage. Warren and her colleagues have insisted her heritage was not an issue during her hiring, but she seemed to hedge in her comments on Tuesday: "Not that I can recall," she said, when asked if she had mentioned her ancestry during the application process. That's different than "No."
Now the Herald has some actual substance on the candidate's claims: Warren's great-great-great grandmother on her mother's side was Cherokee, making Warrenprovided the genealogist didn't miss anything1/32 Native American if her great-great-great grandmother was full-blooded (that's unclear).
http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2012/05/elizabeth-warren-is-part-native-american
LiveNudePolitics
(285 posts)I loooove mother jones!
ryan_cats
(2,061 posts)Bingo, that is the real issue.
LiveNudePolitics
(285 posts)to me, when I hear my friends talking about their family history, how it is so very clear and recent, cherished and preserved when everyone is proud to be Irish, Mexican, Asian, African, or whatever, and I know so little about my Dad's Cherokee heritage because his parents worked hard to hide it all their lives, just to barely feed their kids. But my daughters have been busy working at finding more information on their roots, here in this brave new digital age.