Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cal04

(41,505 posts)
Fri Sep 21, 2012, 08:22 PM Sep 2012

CNN Money: Romney full tax history still a mystery

(snip)
The letter did not give any dollar amounts of income or taxes paid. And it only referred to adjusted gross income, rather than total income, which can be substantially higher.

"Adjusted gross income is not a full measure of income," said Roberton Williams, a senior fellow at the Tax Policy Center.

Williams said the wealthy often use tax shelters and investments overseas to reduce their adjusted gross income and the resulting tax bite.

"What you'd like to know is what was his full income from all sources and what taxes did he pay," Williams said. "That would give you an appropriate measure of his effective tax rate rate."

http://money.cnn.com/2012/09/21/news/economy/romney-tax-history/index.html
more at link

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
CNN Money: Romney full tax history still a mystery (Original Post) cal04 Sep 2012 OP
wow awake Sep 2012 #1
That's saying something. GreenPartyVoter Sep 2012 #3
I know! There's a first time for everything, I suppose XemaSab Sep 2012 #6
Ouch! The MsM has taken off the kit gloves salin Sep 2012 #2
Come clean, Mitt. n/t ProSense Sep 2012 #4
K&R highplainsdem Sep 2012 #5

salin

(48,955 posts)
2. Ouch! The MsM has taken off the kit gloves
Fri Sep 21, 2012, 08:31 PM
Sep 2012

for a couple of decades we have watched this fake equivalency of news coverage (except on Fox) where when one says something negative about one candidate or party, there is an attempt to put out an "equal" negative on the other side in an attempt to project neutrality. Even when there is no equivalence.

In the past week, the ground has shifted significantly. A large majority of the public has adopted the view that this candidate and those pushing his method are completely synthetic (made out of non-natural materials to create some other fabric), and completely opaque.

The fact that CNN is reporting that even what has been released is still questionable per understanding it, is (in my opinion) a rather big deal. Signals a significant shift in the landscape.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»CNN Money: Romney full ta...