Friendly forums for passionate Dems!
More than 91 million posts since 2001
Home Latest Greatest Videos Forums Hide ads Join up!
Home Latest Greatest
Videos Forums Help
Hide ads Join up!
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ha!
Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ha! (Original Post) imanamerican63 Aug 2020 OP
Ha ha!!! Karadeniz Aug 2020 #1
And it's 8-2... the same two judges that went 2-1 back when it was with 3 judges Claustrum Aug 2020 #2

Claustrum

(4,845 posts)
2. And it's 8-2... the same two judges that went 2-1 back when it was with 3 judges
Reply to imanamerican63 (Original post)
Mon Aug 31, 2020, 02:16 PM
Aug 2020

As you can see, Trump is trying to pack the court to go his way. But when other normal judges are included, they are singled out.

TopBack to the top of the page AlertAlert this post for a rule violation ShareGet links to this post PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
  EditCannot edit other people's posts RecommendRecommend this post ReplyReply to this post
Reply to this discussion
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ha!
Home | Latest Discussions | Greatest Discussions | Latest Videos | All Forums

About | Copyright | Privacy | Terms of service | Contact

In Memoriam

© 2001 - 2024 Democratic Underground, LLC. Thank you for visiting.