Trump should be impeached immediately

[Mr.Bill]

for telling people to vote twice. I know the Senate will not vote to remove him from office, I just want my great great grandchildren to read that in their history books.

[Blue Owl]

1. "Go ahead... at least try cheating. It worked for me!"

[BKDem]

2. When is anybody going to do anything?

[Doodley]

3. Many Germans were saying the same thing all through the 1930s.

[stillcool]

4. when someone can do something?

[Botany]

5. All the republican members of the Senate Intel committee knew the Trump/Russia fucking ...

... w/our elections in 2016 was real but they still voted to aquit him durning his senate
trial.

[SheltieLover]

8. This!👆

But impeach him again & again & again. Keep grabbing the news & keep exposing his illegal behavior!

[beachbumbob]

6. We can't even get subpoenas enforced and now waste time on another

fruitless impeachment effort?

[Mr.Bill]

7. I don't think it's a waste of time.

Rather it's a dereliction of duty to not do so. What else is the House of Representatives doing right now?

[Demsrule86]

19. Wrong...a dereliction of duty would be to lose the presidential and give Trump four more years ...

NO impeachment period....time to win elections.

[Mr.Bill]

21. I think we can do both. n/t

[Demsrule86]

28. I am not confident of that.

Let's win the election.

[Demsrule86]

20. And it would anger voters who are hurting in terms of unemployment, food insecurity etc.

[jcgoldie]

9. Pretty sure you can repost thread title...

...on at least a biweekly basis throughout the past 3 years and the 60 days to come with completely unrelated subject matter in the body of the post.

[Polybius]

10. I'd be ok with it but it's risky

House members who vote yes might go down in popularity if they impeach him this close to the election.

[USALiberal]

11. NO, a total waste of time! nt

[Under The Radar]

12. Should vote to impeach as many times as GOP votes to abolish the ACA

[intrepidity]

13. Agree, because of egregiousness, and simplicity

Unlike many other impeachable offenses he has committed, this one is so utterly plain and simple, and strikes a blow at the very foundation of our country.

To *not* impeach over it is, to me, mind-boggling.

[rso]

14. Barr

Impeach again and as a separate matter, also start using “inherent contempt”, a perfectly legal tactic to forcibly bring in people to testify.

[EndlessWire]

15. I have always advocated a second impeachment.

I think the timing is off now.

I think we should pour our energy, heart, and soul into getting Joe and Kamala elected by the People. Whatever that takes.

There is nothing to stop us from preparing for a second impeachment, and letting the GOP know it's coming. I would file charges during the interim period between November and January. The entire composition of the Congress might tip to our benefit in November. If we took back the Senate and held the House, then we would have a chance of convicting him.

Along with Trump, I'd file against Barr.

What good would any of that do? You know he is setting up to protest the vote and involve the SC. We will STILL need to remove him from office in November! He's going to run amok in November and during the end of his regime. If we could control the Senate, we could remove him from office at that time and maybe prevent some of the damage he will try to inflict on us. We could make his SC run moot.

I don't think that all the House Patriots are just sitting there. There will be something afoot.

[EndlessWire]

16. I'm aware that

the Senate doesn't kick in right away. Instead of an inauguration celebration, let's have impeachment hearings.

[Demsrule86]

18. No.

[EndlessWire]

23. I'd like to avoid a civil war.

Your cryptic "no" is noted. Please elaborate. Are you just tired?

[Demsrule86]

27. What is the point of impeachment when it will not achieve a conviction in the Senate?

I see no benefit.

[EndlessWire]

29. I see a benefit

when Trump plans to claim fraudulent voting, and a delay in transition. The Senate may well be sitting there voted out. They might want to posture a bit.

You never let the enemy rest. Trump will savage us if he loses. We should have impeached him a second time, for sure. But, Nancy didn't. I think with this last "vote twice" crap, it is at least as offensive as the Ukraine scandal.

I don't know if an attempt to deny election results has to be the entire Congress or not. If only individual Critters can file a protest, then Trump might be sitting there with no Senate protection, waiting for the SC to rule. We can get him then.

But first, we have to win. Then second, take the Senate. Might as well draw up Articles of Impeachment to have them ready. I'd like to see Trump sitting there from November to January with this threat over his head.

[Demsrule86]

17. We have elections to win...with the Senate not convicting no matter what...waste of time.

[jcgoldie]

22. There you go.

They had their chance to do the right thing and they tied the anchor tighter to their necks the time for impeachment is over throw em all overboard.

[Demsrule86]

26. Impeachement won't hurt the GOP Senate. It may not hurt Trump. We need to win the election...so no

I do not favor another impeachment.

[Retrograde]

24. I told my congressperson

that the House needs to introduce a new article of impeachment every week: the deities know he's done enough to justify them. They can start on November 4. Or January 3 after noon.

I want to see Drump go down in history as the first president to be impeached more than once - and McConnell to go down as the Archenabler.

[Demsrule86]

25. See my goal is for Trump to leave office in 2021...I do not believe impeachment would improve our

chances to win the election. In times of economic trouble, voters get really pissed to see money used for political shit like impeachment. We could impeach him into a second term. No thanks.