Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Fresh_Start

(11,330 posts)
Sun Sep 23, 2012, 04:51 PM Sep 2012

is it true that Romney as Governor vetoed a law preventing outsourcing of jobs paid for by taxpayers

Massachusetts lost 14% of its manufacturing jobs (double the national rate) because he vetoed legislation that would have banned companies doing business with the state from outsourcing jobs to other countries. I

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
is it true that Romney as Governor vetoed a law preventing outsourcing of jobs paid for by taxpayers (Original Post) Fresh_Start Sep 2012 OP
Romney also outsourced state call center jobs. bluestate10 Sep 2012 #1
FactCheck.Org judged it an "overreach" DonViejo Sep 2012 #2
Factcheck.org is useless, and ProSense Sep 2012 #4
I believe he did. I found this: Jumping John Sep 2012 #3

bluestate10

(10,942 posts)
1. Romney also outsourced state call center jobs.
Sun Sep 23, 2012, 04:55 PM
Sep 2012

Sending state workers that did those jobs to unemployment. It is true that Massachusetts lost manufacturing under Romney.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
4. Factcheck.org is useless, and
Sun Sep 23, 2012, 05:25 PM
Sep 2012

that's from June, when the media/factchecking organizations were covering Mitt's ass.

"Overreach"?

The state wasn’t outsourcing contracts. Rather, in some cases, state contractors were subcontracting work to companies overseas. Romney vetoed a bill that would have prevented the state from doing business with companies that outsourced any state work to other countries. The veto was supported by leading newspapers as a savings to taxpayers. The Democratic Legislature did not override Romney’s veto, as it did with most of his vetoes.

So he did, but it's an "overreach"?

Like I said, Factcheck.org is useless. Besides, Mitt can't escape his outsourcing past.

July:

Romney Ad Calling Obama a Liar Proven Wrong
http://www.politicususa.com/busted-romney-ad-obama-lying-outsourcing-romney-left-bain.html

August:

Romney Invested In Company That Is Outsourcing Jobs, Forcing Workers To Train...Chinese Replacements
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021195910


 

Jumping John

(930 posts)
3. I believe he did. I found this:
Sun Sep 23, 2012, 05:08 PM
Sep 2012

That ad also repeats the claim that as governor of Massachusetts, Romney was “outsourcing state jobs to India.” But it wasn’t the state that outsourced contracts. Rather, Romney vetoed a measure that would have prevented the state from doing business with a state contractor that was locating state customer-service calls in India.

Outsourced as Governor?

The Obama campaign ad “Come and Go” also claims, “As governor, [Romney] did the same thing, outsourcing state jobs to India.” We looked at this claim when the Obama campaign made it in a previous ad, and we found there was more to the story than the ad let on, as is the case here as well.

The state wasn’t outsourcing contracts. Rather, in some cases, state contractors were subcontracting work to companies overseas. Romney vetoed a bill that would have prevented the state from doing business with companies that outsourced any state work to other countries. The veto was supported by leading newspapers as a savings to taxpayers. The Democratic Legislature did not override Romney’s veto, as it did with most of his vetoes.

At the center of the issue was a contract the state signed with CitiGroup (which later sold the division to JP Morgan Chase) to handle calls about food stamps, and that company outsourced the work to a company in India. At the time, 38 states had similar contracts with JP Morgan Chase to handle food stamp calls. It became an issue everywhere, and Ohio Rep. Marcy Kaptur called for federal legislation to ban it. When the Massachusetts contract was up, the state Department of Transitional Assistance required work to be done in the U.S. It hired another firm that handled the calls from Utah, so the practice ultimately ended, but Massachusetts didn’t get the jobs.

http://factcheck.org/2012/06/obamas-outsourcer-overreach/

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»is it true that Romney as...