Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NoRoadUntravelled

(2,626 posts)
Sat Sep 5, 2020, 01:31 AM Sep 2020

Is it just me, or has anyone else noticed that the terms "rioters" and "protesters" are coming to

mean the same thing by the current administration and its supporters.
It reminds me of how the Bush administration would evoke Saddam Hussein within just a few words following mention of 9/11 again and again.
It didn't take long before the connection between the two was complete in the minds of supportive listeners. I believed at the time, and still believe, it was one of the ways they gained support for the invasion of Iraq.

The term "rioters" seems to be used much more often by this administration than the term "protesters" despite the fact that those doing damage are far outnumbered by peaceful protesters. Is this why so many gun carrying vigilantes believe they must also be on the streets now to add their bullets to the fray of thrown water bottles?

Maybe trying to understand it is pointless. idk

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is it just me, or has anyone else noticed that the terms "rioters" and "protesters" are coming to (Original Post) NoRoadUntravelled Sep 2020 OP
Propaganda 101 kurtcagle Sep 2020 #1
This. And the 'Pukes are way better at it mostly because they're utterly shameless in their mr_lebowski Sep 2020 #2
They have no shame. NoRoadUntravelled Sep 2020 #4
Yes, what you say makes a lot of sense. NoRoadUntravelled Sep 2020 #3
Yep, conflation of terms is a propaganda tool... Wounded Bear Sep 2020 #5
Yes, and it's discouraging how many keep falling for it. NoRoadUntravelled Sep 2020 #6

kurtcagle

(1,601 posts)
1. Propaganda 101
Sat Sep 5, 2020, 02:30 AM
Sep 2020

Calling them protestors implies that the people have some reason to protest. Calling them rioters, on the other hand paints them as lawless anarchists out to destroy hard working business owners' livelihoods. Conflate the two and the association gets made. This is straight out of Goebbels' playbook. This is Stephen Miller's handiwork, as filtered through Trump's Aderal-affected brain.

 

mr_lebowski

(33,643 posts)
2. This. And the 'Pukes are way better at it mostly because they're utterly shameless in their
Sat Sep 5, 2020, 06:52 AM
Sep 2020

depraved and insatiable quest for money and power.

There's no lie too vile for them when gaining power is on the line by telling it.

NoRoadUntravelled

(2,626 posts)
3. Yes, what you say makes a lot of sense.
Sat Sep 5, 2020, 11:42 AM
Sep 2020

More and more people seem to believe it as time passes. Other than wait for the election, I guess there's not much we can do. It's not possible to argue someone into a discerning or logical state of mind. I've given up trying.

Wounded Bear

(58,590 posts)
5. Yep, conflation of terms is a propaganda tool...
Sat Sep 5, 2020, 11:48 AM
Sep 2020

Much like "Muslim extremists" came to mean that ALL Muslims are extremists.

Lather, rinse, repeat.

NoRoadUntravelled

(2,626 posts)
6. Yes, and it's discouraging how many keep falling for it.
Sat Sep 5, 2020, 12:02 PM
Sep 2020

2016 was all about creating a fear of Muslims. What he did with travel bans caused so much suffering but his supporters didn't care because they bought the lie.
Once the election was over it became a non-issue.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is it just me, or has any...