Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
Mon Sep 24, 2012, 07:19 AM Sep 2012

People talk a lot about the inevitability of globalism...

I'd like to explore whether or not that is true with the great collection of minds here on DU.


-What would happen if we put huge tariffs on goods from countries like China which are able to keep costs low due to a falsely low currency and/or a depressingly low cost of labor?

Would it have all bad effects or some good ones too such as increasing our own manufacturing and keeping our wealth circulating domestically?

What other issues -plusses and minuses are there?

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
People talk a lot about the inevitability of globalism... (Original Post) Bonobo Sep 2012 OP
You saw China threaten economic war on Japan using Japanese Bonds. dkf Sep 2012 #1
Economic war, ok... Bonobo Sep 2012 #2
Same thing...unload bonds which would do some very very bad things to interest rates. dkf Sep 2012 #3
 

dkf

(37,305 posts)
1. You saw China threaten economic war on Japan using Japanese Bonds.
Mon Sep 24, 2012, 07:22 AM
Sep 2012

I dare say huge tariffs will also be perceived as economic war.

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
2. Economic war, ok...
Mon Sep 24, 2012, 07:30 AM
Sep 2012

But what does that mean? So let's say they declare economic war... it could mean, for example, that they stop selling rare metals. But there are always other sources and surely something would ultimately be worked out.

As long as military action is avoided, surely our economies would reach some new type of equilibrium once they adjusted to deal with the new tariffs or whatever.

 

dkf

(37,305 posts)
3. Same thing...unload bonds which would do some very very bad things to interest rates.
Mon Sep 24, 2012, 07:35 AM
Sep 2012

Well the Fed is buying all the Treasuries in sight anyway. Maybe they can do the same for the Chinese held bonds.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/china-business/9551727/Beijing-hints-at-bond-attack-on-Japan.html

"Jin Baisong from the Chinese Academy of International Trade – a branch of the commerce ministry – said China should use its power as Japan’s biggest creditor with $230bn (£141bn) of bonds to “impose sanctions on Japan in the most effective manner” and bring Tokyo’s festering fiscal crisis to a head.
Writing in the Communist Party newspaper China Daily, Mr Jin called on China to invoke the “security exception” rule under the World Trade Organisation to punish Japan, rejecting arguments that a trade war between the two Pacific giants would be mutually destructive."

http://investorplace.com/2012/09/china-japan-bond-attack-senkaku-islands-us-bonds/

The consensus view has long been that China wouldn’t take the chance of wholesale selling off its position in U.S. bonds, since it would drive up rates and hurt the value of its remaining position. Still, the fact that this is being raised as an issue shows that such a move is in fact on the table in a dispute.

This matters for the United States because China holds $1.15 trillion of our debt, according to the most recent U.S. Treasury data, which means that it holds more than 20% of all U.S. debt held overseas. This recent article in the Telegraph shows that in any future disputes with the United States, China might not be afraid to engage in saber-rattling with its most dangerous weapon: its influence over U.S. interest rates.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»People talk a lot about t...