General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPeople talk a lot about the inevitability of globalism...
I'd like to explore whether or not that is true with the great collection of minds here on DU.
-What would happen if we put huge tariffs on goods from countries like China which are able to keep costs low due to a falsely low currency and/or a depressingly low cost of labor?
Would it have all bad effects or some good ones too such as increasing our own manufacturing and keeping our wealth circulating domestically?
What other issues -plusses and minuses are there?
dkf
(37,305 posts)I dare say huge tariffs will also be perceived as economic war.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)But what does that mean? So let's say they declare economic war... it could mean, for example, that they stop selling rare metals. But there are always other sources and surely something would ultimately be worked out.
As long as military action is avoided, surely our economies would reach some new type of equilibrium once they adjusted to deal with the new tariffs or whatever.
dkf
(37,305 posts)Well the Fed is buying all the Treasuries in sight anyway. Maybe they can do the same for the Chinese held bonds.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/china-business/9551727/Beijing-hints-at-bond-attack-on-Japan.html
"Jin Baisong from the Chinese Academy of International Trade a branch of the commerce ministry said China should use its power as Japans biggest creditor with $230bn (£141bn) of bonds to impose sanctions on Japan in the most effective manner and bring Tokyos festering fiscal crisis to a head.
Writing in the Communist Party newspaper China Daily, Mr Jin called on China to invoke the security exception rule under the World Trade Organisation to punish Japan, rejecting arguments that a trade war between the two Pacific giants would be mutually destructive."
http://investorplace.com/2012/09/china-japan-bond-attack-senkaku-islands-us-bonds/
The consensus view has long been that China wouldnt take the chance of wholesale selling off its position in U.S. bonds, since it would drive up rates and hurt the value of its remaining position. Still, the fact that this is being raised as an issue shows that such a move is in fact on the table in a dispute.
This matters for the United States because China holds $1.15 trillion of our debt, according to the most recent U.S. Treasury data, which means that it holds more than 20% of all U.S. debt held overseas. This recent article in the Telegraph shows that in any future disputes with the United States, China might not be afraid to engage in saber-rattling with its most dangerous weapon: its influence over U.S. interest rates.