General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsShopper flaunting his gun in checkout line shoots himself in the groin, Oregon cops say
A man showing off his gun to a friend accidentally shot himself in the groin and leg, Oregon police said.
Lincoln City Police said in a Monday news release that Nicholas Ellingford, a 29-year-old from Lincoln City, Oregon, shot himself Sunday at a supermarket.
Investigation revealed that Ellingford was inside the store and as he was waiting in the checkout line, he un-holstered a Glock 9mm semi-automatic pistol from his waistband so that he could show it off to a friend, police said in the news release.
Ellingford reportedly was holding the gun near the front of his pants when he accidentally pulled the trigger, police said.
https://news.yahoo.com/shopper-flaunting-gun-checkout-line-001726879.html
I encourage all Republicans to own the libs this way.
CrispyQ
(37,841 posts)Dumb fuck.
Illumination
(2,458 posts)whistler162
(11,155 posts)it is a Darwin Award.
PufPuf23
(9,233 posts)Boogiemack
(1,406 posts)That was close!
CaptYossarian
(6,448 posts)On an overcompensating Neanderthal like him, there's nothing left.
He won't have the balls to do that again.
HermitageHermit
(42 posts)This young man should lose no procreative powers.
Nowadays, they can even do penile transplants
Le Roi de Pot
(744 posts)lunatica
(53,410 posts)Well, his lack of penis now matches his brain capacity. Karma has evened it all out. Balance has been restored.
Crunchy Frog
(26,883 posts)ornotna
(11,041 posts)Not sure it they can save the twins if they were blown to smithereens.
HermitageHermit
(42 posts)The report from the Lincoln City police on the injury sounds like the round missed his testicles. The bullet entered into Ellingfords groin area before exiting out the lower thigh of his leg, narrowly missing his femoral artery,
ornotna
(11,041 posts)He could have been gone very quickly had it hit the femoral artery. He's a dumb ass, but a lucky dumb ass.
gopiscrap
(24,113 posts)voting
lindysalsagal
(22,150 posts)Bettie
(16,825 posts)seriously a clueless human.
Aristus
(67,915 posts)malaise
(276,568 posts)That is all
ToxMarz
(2,220 posts)and no longer can. Then Darwin WINS!
malaise
(276,568 posts)by letting him take himself out of the equation
sakabatou
(42,821 posts)I thought it was just the first part but that will work.
whistler162
(11,155 posts)"
Rules
So how are the Darwin Awards actually determined?
Nominees significantly improve the gene pool by eliminating themselves from the human race in an obviously stupid way. They are self-selected examples of the dangers inherent in a lack of common sense, and all human races, cultures, and socioeconomic groups are eligible to compete. Actual winners must meet the following criteria:
Reproduction
Out of the gene pool: dead or sterile.
Excellence
Astounding misapplication of judgment.
Self-Selection
Cause one's own demise.
Maturity
Capable of sound judgment.
Veracity
The event must be true."
Response to ToxMarz (Reply #16)
malaise This message was self-deleted by its author.
Richard D
(9,268 posts)whistler162
(11,155 posts)himself or didn't reproduce already. Darwin Awards are for taking oneself out of the gene pool, death is one method losing one's ability to reproduce is also a method.
Crunchy Frog
(26,883 posts)he's rendered himself incapable of doing it anymore. He's still removed himself from the gene pool, just as much as he would have if he'd gotten himself killed.
That's assuming that he actually has destroyed his reproductive capacity. Hoping that's the case.
Bengus81
(7,315 posts)Crazy fuck could have easily killed someone
Demsrule86
(70,753 posts)Kaleva
(37,798 posts)Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)...if your line of thinking is, "I need this thing to protect myself," then not having a round in the chamber is a pretty dumb move. It takes time to rack a round, and one thing you do not have in a self-defense situation is time. Whoever gets the jump generally wins.
Disaffected
(4,946 posts)if you live at the OK Corral.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)But then, there's a lot I don't know about geography.
Disaffected
(4,946 posts)Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)I know what the OK Corral is.
The point is, if you carry a weapon for self-defense, an empty chamber negates most of the benefit the weapon would have given you. Might as well not carry a gun at all.
Dial H For Hero
(2,971 posts)will cause a round to "accidentally" go off.
Kaleva
(37,798 posts)The man in question has shown himself to be unqualified to have any kind of gun. For a highly trained person, a Glock or any other semi-auto with a round in the chamber may be a excellent option. Many, IMHO, don't have that level of training in handling a semi-auto so not having a round chambered would be an extra layer of safety in case they or someone else mishandles the gun.
cocked and locked, no safety, striker fire guns (glocks) are NOT a casual owner type of gun.
But it's now the "choice" for a lot of very new, very casual, very inexperienced people who like to think they're top shots.
Until they shoot their nuts off....
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)JHB
(37,322 posts)lpbk2713
(43,149 posts)And thought "You simple minded fuck."
CaptYossarian
(6,448 posts)Don't stores have a camera trained on each register?
Think of the possibilities: Slow motion, a laugh track, and the actual audio of his voice changing from "truck commercial guy" to mezzo-soprano.
If I were in line, you'd also hear applause.
Illumination
(2,458 posts)CaptYossarian
(6,448 posts)for the employee Christmas party.
Illumination
(2,458 posts)with all the posts! It reminds me of the sinking boats on Lake Travis & everyone went nuts! Gosh darn it. Knew I should have joined DU long ago...
CaptYossarian
(6,448 posts)It's "fair and balanced".
That reminds me--I haven't called Mike Pence "Frank Burns" for a while. I wonder what he's been up to.
Illumination
(2,458 posts)Buns_of_Fire
(17,740 posts)barbtries
(29,555 posts)omigawd that's so funny.
CaptYossarian
(6,448 posts)The Oregon guy is now covering Frankie Valli songs.
Dem2theMax
(10,166 posts)Bless you. I really needed to laugh.
louis-t
(23,520 posts)handle a gun", that I refer to all the time?
edit to put in a
Lochloosa
(16,369 posts)Jim__
(14,391 posts)Illumination
(2,458 posts)CaptYossarian
(6,448 posts)That's the wrong trigger finger.
The real shame is that he can't count to eleven anymore.
3Hotdogs
(13,250 posts)CaptYossarian
(6,448 posts)Dark n Stormy Knight
(9,975 posts)Maybe do that for all such belligerently ignorant assholes who hurt themselves or other through such negligent behavior. It wouldn't be nice, but I'm sick of Dems bringing a butter knife to a gun fight, so to speak.
greenjar_01
(6,477 posts)Fantastic.
FuzzyRabbit
(2,065 posts)Gotta give credit where credit is due.
JI7
(90,204 posts)of his wannabe tough guy outfit.
oasis
(51,422 posts)AllaN01Bear
(22,646 posts)Kaleva
(37,798 posts)They have instead 3 safety mechanisms which are not effective when the gun owner puts his finger on the trigger and the gun has a round in the chamber.
Baclava
(12,047 posts)niyad
(118,648 posts)Baclava
(12,047 posts)It actually has 3 internal safties, you can throw it across a parking lot and it wont go off with a round in the chamber and ready to fire
But stuffing it in your pants is the stupidest idea of all time, ask Plaxico Burress
jmowreader
(51,245 posts)Glocks are designed not to off if you drop them, and they dont.
They are also designed not to fire if the trigger gets snagged on the holster or your clothes, and they dont.
But for fucks sake, what kind of a gun owner puts his finger on the trigger while hes taking his shootin iron out to show it to someone?
angrychair
(9,553 posts)why on Earth would you draw a gun in a grocery store line...right before a cashier.
How do we know he wasn't trying to rob the place?
How am I supposed to know if he's a good guy with a gun or a bad guy with a gun in that situation?
iscooterliberally
(2,989 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)Carry glocks with a round in the chamber, glocks have no safety..Stupid
trc
(824 posts)I said I would never own one because, while it does have a safety that prevents it accidentally discharging if dropped, that safety is built into the trigger. Great for LEO's, terrible for any one who might carry in a purse...or put their finger on the trigger when pulling it out of their pants. And yes, you always keep your finger off the trigger, unless you are showing off cause your an idiot, or are an FBI agent reaching to quickly pick your weapon after it fell out of your concealed holster while you were doing a back flip, for example.
Dial H For Hero
(2,971 posts)Codeine
(25,586 posts)out of normal folders, please? Theres a gunhumper dungeon for these silly-ass arguments.
Dial H For Hero
(2,971 posts)Timewas
(2,264 posts)To oranges
Timewas
(2,264 posts)A Glock requires about 5lbs pressure to fire, a double action might take as much as 10 to 12 lbs which would require a lot more effort and much much less chance of accidental discharge.
Dial H For Hero
(2,971 posts)can certainly be 10 to 12 lbs, as you say....but plenty are in the 8 to 9 lb. range. In many instances there isn't that much of a difference. My preferred choice for concealed carry is a Sig P365, which has a trigger pull of around 6 lbs.
Timewas
(2,264 posts)They can vary by as much as 2 lbs, and most professionals and well trained civilians can get away with a Glock with a round in battery but the average out there don't have the training to be safe
My carry is Beretta Storm PX4 in 40 which is about a 12lb pull
Dial H For Hero
(2,971 posts)to the range and putting a single box of ammo (if that) through their gun. I've never recommended that someone own firearms for defensive purposes if they're not willing to put in the effort to gain at least minimal competance.
Timewas
(2,264 posts)A glock with a round in the chamber you better have serious trigger discipline keep it clear until actually ready to fire and then only if pointed in a safe direction..
Dial H For Hero
(2,971 posts)Sancho
(9,085 posts)This is my generic response to gun threads where people are shot and killed by the dumb or criminal possession of guns. For the record, I grew up in the South and on military bases. I was taught about firearms as a child, and I grew up hunting, was a member of the NRA, and I still own guns. In the 70s, I dropped out of the NRA because they become more radical and less interested in safety and training. Some personal experiences where people I know were involved in shootings caused me to realize that anyone could obtain and posses a gun no matter how illogical it was for them to have a gun. Also, easy access to more powerful guns, guns in the hands of children, and guns that werent secured are out of control in our society. As such, heres what I now think ought to be the requirements to possess a gun. Im not debating the legal language, I just think its the reasonable way to stop the shootings. Notice, none of this restricts the type of guns sold. This is aimed at the people who shoot others, because its clear that they should never have had a gun.
1.) Anyone in possession of a gun (whether they own it or not) should have a regularly renewed license. If you want to call it a permit, certificate, or something else that's fine.
2.) To get a license, you should have a background check, and be examined by a professional for emotional and mental stability appropriate for gun possession. It might be appropriate to require that examination to be accompanied by references from family, friends, employers, etc. This check is not to subject you to a mental health diagnosis, just check on your superficial and apparent gun-worthyness.
3.) To get the license, you should be required to take a safety course and pass a test appropriate to the type of gun you want to use.
4.) To get a license, you should be over 21. Under 21, you could only use a gun under direct supervision of a licensed person and after obtaining a learners license. Your license might be restricted if you have children or criminals or other unsafe people living in your home. (If you want to argue 18 or 25 or some other age, fine. 21 makes sense to me.)
5.) If you possess a gun, you would have to carry a liability insurance policy specifically for gun ownership - and likely you would have to provide proof of appropriate storage, security, and whatever statistical reasons that emerge that would drive the costs and ability to get insurance.
6.) You could not purchase a gun or ammunition without a license, and purchases would have a waiting period.
7.) If you possess a gun without a license, you go to jail, the gun is impounded, and a judge will have to let you go (just like a DUI).
8.) No one should carry an unsecured gun (except in a locked case, unloaded) when outside of home. Guns should be secure when transporting to a shooting event without demonstrating a special need. Their license should indicate training and special carry circumstances beyond recreational shooting (security guard, etc.). If you are carrying your gun while under the influence of drugs or alcohol, you lose your gun and license.
9.) If you buy, sell, give away, or inherit a gun, your license information should be recorded.
10.) If you accidentally discharge your gun, commit a crime, get referred by a mental health professional, are served a restraining order, etc., you should lose your license and guns until reinstated by a serious relicensing process.
Most of you know that a license is no big deal. Besides a drivers license you need a license to fish, operate a boat, or many other activities. I realize these differ by state, but that is not a reason to let anyone without a bit of sense pack a semiautomatic weapon in public, on the roads, and in schools. I think we need to make it much harder for some people to have guns.
BarbD
(1,210 posts)Am making a copy for future reference.
ashredux
(2,690 posts)Evolve Dammit
(18,259 posts)Illumination
(2,458 posts)sure why not
(39 posts)Response to Zorro (Original post)
StTimofEdenRoc This message was self-deleted by its author.
sdfernando
(5,297 posts)Article doesn't say his political affiliation but I think we can all guess what that is. A little to the left or right and he probably would be looking at a Darwin Award nomination.
Or maybe a bit higher to the left or right and he could be famous for shooting his own dick off...and still be a Darwin Award nominee.
flamin lib
(14,559 posts)"A man's gotta' know his limitations."
Also, "Diein' ain't much of a livin' boy."
Response to flamin lib (Reply #31)
Doc_Technical This message was self-deleted by its author.
ResistantAmerican17
(4,068 posts)sarisataka
(20,660 posts)with possible reinforcement-
redstatebluegirl
(12,447 posts)Hotler
(11,884 posts)he grabbed his firearm with his right hand and when comparing the two the firearm discharged blowing off the end of his gun. Bystanders witnessing the event were heard as they walked away, "the firearm was bigger". Now his gun is a true conceal carry.
CaptYossarian
(6,448 posts)Let freedumb ring.
JohnnyRingo
(19,184 posts)...as so often happens when people begin playing with a gun. It's not a toy.
LW1977
(1,358 posts)Well... anymore
BumRushDaShow
(139,549 posts)Mariana
(14,927 posts)NBachers
(17,912 posts)Crunchy Frog
(26,883 posts)I hope he gets prosecuted for the negligent discharge. (No such thing as "accidentally pulling the trigger".)
melm00se
(5,044 posts)off the bang switch until you are on target.
One of the 1st things taught in gun training classes.
irisblue
(33,890 posts)snip-"As Ellingford was placing the firearm back in the front of his pants near the zipper & button areas, he accidently pulled the trigger causing the firearm to discharge. The bullet entered into Ellingfords groin area before exiting out the lower thigh of his leg, narrowly missing is femoral artery. Officers on scene immediately rendered first aid before medics from Pac-West Ambulance & North Lincoln Fire arrived to take over treatment. Ellingford was transported code-3 to Samaritan North Lincoln Hospital where he was immediately flown, via Life Flight to Legacy Emanuel Hospital in Portland, Oregon.
No one else was injured in this incident, however a criminal investigation is ongoing, as Ellingford did not have a concealed handgun license and his act was found to be reckless since it placed several people in danger."
More at source
source-https://flashalert.net/id/LincolnCityPolice/138299?fbclid=IwAR35-cj9MnnwutLeNGwCPzE_B-jKzyohUd_OqnT5HR-3tzqfilDsUeMWoT4
NBachers
(17,912 posts)Will the abuse never end??
You payin' for this shit, asshole, or are we picking up the tab for your belligerent stupidity?
PatrickforO
(15,022 posts)iluvtennis
(20,608 posts)LuckyCharms
(18,565 posts)njhoneybadger
(3,910 posts)dumbcat
(2,128 posts)Glocks do not have a manual safety.
njhoneybadger
(3,910 posts)EX500rider
(11,369 posts)Which is fine if u are smart enough not to pull the trigger on a loaded gun until u mean too.
njhoneybadger
(3,910 posts)EX500rider
(11,369 posts)dalton99a
(83,617 posts)liberalmuse
(18,849 posts)Their family went on vacation to California. The morning they arrived, the husband went to the trunk to show relatives his shotgun. It accidentally went off and killed their newborn baby sitting in the car seat.
Another coworker had a party at his house and wanted to show off his guns. He kept his safe unlocked. Of course all the kids, including my daughter wanted to hold one. I told him he would not be giving the gun to my daughter until he checked the chamber. "I checked it. It's empty". After a few times of trying to convince me it was not loaded, I told him my daughter would not be holding that gun until he checked the chamber in front of us, so he finally checked the chamber and found a bullet. This guy was ex-law enforcement and deemed himself a responsible gun owner.
lindysalsagal
(22,150 posts)imho
Illumination
(2,458 posts)more trouble than their worth...
Leith
(7,851 posts)How can we show our faces in public again?
At least, nobody else got injured.
N_E_1 for Tennis
(10,561 posts)Baclava
(12,047 posts)Dial H For Hero
(2,971 posts)they're ready to fire. They do have a "safe action trigger", which is a tiny lever in front of the trigger which must be depressed to fire it. They also have a trigger pull that's similar to that of a double action only revolver. Long story short, it takes a deliberate trigger pull to fire it.
N_E_1 for Tennis
(10,561 posts)Wait wait wait...humorous is in the upper body...sorry wrong way.
Dial H For Hero
(2,971 posts)N_E_1 for Tennis
(10,561 posts)LuckyCharms
(18,565 posts)NCjack
(10,290 posts)for remedial training. If anyone needs it, he does.
titanicdave
(430 posts)......when I read this.......it serves the little bastard right for "showing off his 'manhood'".....HA...HA...HA...HA
calimary
(83,738 posts)PoindexterOglethorpe
(26,293 posts)"How guns make us safer".
lame54
(36,445 posts)LiberalFighter
(53,301 posts)Mendocino
(7,656 posts)...no, were out of nuts.
Fritz Walter
(4,346 posts)"...denn sie kommt von Herzen!"
Translation: Schadenfreude is the most sublime/beautiful joy, because it comes from the heart!"
niyad
(118,648 posts)niyad
(118,648 posts)himself from being a criminally stupid danger to society. Code 3? Immediate airlift? .sounds damned serious, maybe even fatal. One can always hope.
Blue Owl
(54,141 posts)n/t
Talitha
(7,353 posts)Thank goodness no one except him got hurt, and I honestly hope the store bans him for life.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(113,683 posts)Those are accidents waiting to happen.
LPBBEAR
(320 posts)Cleanup in aisle 3!
Grokenstein
(5,802 posts)Just glad he didn't kill some innocent person with his carelessness...this time.
Marcuse
(7,957 posts)Gun Enthusiasts Celebrate Man Who Shot Himself in the Balls as Their King
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/y3zeew/gun-enthusiasts-celebrate-man-who-shot-himself-in-the-balls-as-their-king
mountain grammy
(27,104 posts)For the only laughs Ive had today.
BHDem53
(1,076 posts)his bullet in his shirt pocket.
Withywindle
(9,988 posts)Thoughts: what an idiot
Prayers: Gods, please continue to spread karma awareness
RANDYWILDMAN
(2,839 posts)but Nick will be back, maybe no gun next time.
Cha
(303,801 posts)Instant Karma can be a MF!
Tribetime
(5,849 posts)Funniest thing I heard all day
Niagara
(9,143 posts)Blue_true
(31,261 posts)He should be charged with reckless endangerment. Maybe his friend is ok with him, but he could have killed that person or another person in that store. Those idiots buy guns and dont familiarize themselves with how to operate the safety.
warmfeet
(3,321 posts)Always aim for the brain. Too bad, so sad. Maybe next time.
Ferrets are Cool
(21,636 posts)but it was too short to be found by the bullet."
Made up, but probably true.
Straw Man
(6,741 posts)... I'm obliged to point out that revolvers don't either.
This was extremely stupid handling, and goes against everything one is taught in firearms classes. If you carry, the only time you take your gun out of the holster is when you put it away at night or if you need it to defend your life. If you take it to a gunsmith for repair or to a gun shop for trade-in, it had better be unloaded and in a case, or they will throw your ass out of the store.
Kaleva
(37,798 posts)The pull weight to fire my revolver in DA is 11 pounds. I believe Glocks have a trigger pull weight of 5.5 pounds.
One is far less likely to have an accidental discharge with a revolver then with a SA semi-auto.
Straw Man
(6,741 posts)The pull weight to fire my revolver in DA is 11 pounds. I believe Glocks have a trigger pull weight of 5.5 pounds.
One is far less likely to have an accidental discharge with a revolver then with a SA semi-auto.
And one is far less likely to hit one's target with the 11-pound trigger pull than with the 5.5-pound. It's much harder to hold a handgun steady when you need to apply that much force to make the trigger move. The target pistols I shoot have trigger pull weights between 1 and 2 pounds. I have never had an accidental discharge with one because I observe the fundamental rule of keeping my finger off the trigger until ready to pull it. One can't pull the trigger by accident if one isn't touching it when one shouldn't be.
NYPD had a huge increase in accidental discharges when they went to Glocks. This is because the cops had gotten used to keeping their fingers on the triggers of their double-action revolvers, sometimes even "staging" the triggers (partially pulling them) to get an mechanical advantage. The NYPD solution was to modify their Glocks to a 12-pound trigger pull, thereby negating any accuracy advantage they had gained in the changeover. The results can be seen in the Empire State Building shootout in 2012, in which the NYPD officers managed to land direct hits on three bystanders as well as the perp. (An additional six bystanders were hit by ricochets and fragments.)
There's nothing wrong with revolvers, but they aren't a solution to lack of training.
Kaleva
(37,798 posts)"For the peace officer, double-action practice is very probably all that he should ever do; that is, once he has gotten a rudimentary knowledge of gun-pointing by deliberate and painstaking slow-fire practice. The officer who can slam six shots into a cardboard man-silhouette in the space of three seconds is an exceedingly dangerous gunner and it is to be regretted that more of our officers arent trained along these lines
I have done a great deal of double-action shooting with our biggest handguns. "
https://gunsmagazine.com/campfire-tales-2/past-masters-of-the-double-action-sixgun/
I don't know the last time I target practiced using the sights on my revolver. It's been awhile. I can consistently hit center of mass on a man size target up to a range of 7 yards. I don't practice shooting father then that as my house is 24 feet long and there's only 2 spots in the home where it would be possible to shoot that far. I carry my gun while at home but not off my property unless going to and from a shooting range.
Straw Man
(6,741 posts)I agree that outside of target shooting, DA/SA revolvers should only be shot double action. They are more than adequate inside the home. However, I think law enforcement needs greater capacity and the ability to shoot accurately at a greater distance. And of course, better training in when NOT to shoot.
Kaleva
(37,798 posts)What works for you may not be the best choice for me and vice versa.
BigDemVoter
(4,496 posts)I hope it is completely destroyed, gone. . . poof.
burrowowl
(17,946 posts)Aussie105
(6,099 posts)Some people think guns just make a noise to frighten others. They forget about the flying metal bit.
Aussie105
(6,099 posts)When I go shopping, I make sure I have my wallet, my keys, and maybe a shopping bag.
But the Glock, the rapid fire auto shotgun, the surface to air missile and the hand grenades all stay home.
(The last sentence may be a slight exaggeration - I don't own any of those.)
Out of interest - our damaged shopper - how much $$$ did it cost him to own the Glock? And his hospital bills might add up a bit.
Good use of money - NOT!
MadMike47
(114 posts)he moved to another town and changed his name to Les Johnson.
luvallpeeps
(996 posts)That's he chance you take when you wanna rock out with your glock out.
GoneOffShore
(17,559 posts)mwb970
(11,629 posts)quakerboy
(14,082 posts)IF not, why not? Last I checked shooting someone is illegal.
Unless he had his CC, its my understanding its also illegal in Oregon to be carrying a loaded weapon in public.
uriel1972
(4,261 posts)but please permit me a wry snicker at least.