Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 03:49 PM Sep 2012

Mittfuck: Teacher contributions to politicians should be limited

CBS News) Republican nominee Mitt Romney said Tuesday that Democratic politicians have a conflict of interest in dealing with teacher unions because the unions contribute so heavily to their campaigns. He suggested that money should somehow be diverted or cut off, although he did not offer details.

Speaking in New York at Education Nation, a forum sponsored by NBC, Romney told interviewer Brian Williams that he is not necessarily against a right to strike. "I don't know that I would prevent teachers from being able to strike," he said, adding later that "allowing teachers to strike on matters such as compensation I think is a right that exists in this country."

The bigger problem, Romney said, is that "the person sitting across the table from them should not have received the largest campaign contribution from the teachers union themselves ... [It's] an extraordinary conflict of interest and something that should be addressed."

He later added that "we simply can't have" elected officials who have received large contributions from teachers sitting across from them at the bargaining table "supposedly" to represent the interests of children. "I think it's a mistake," Romney said. "I think we have to get the money out of the teachers unions going into campaigns. It's the wrong way for us to go. We've got to separate that."

<snip>

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57520009-503544/romney-teacher-contributions-to-politicians-should-be-limited/

Have I mentioned today that I HATE this piece of shit?

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
1. OK, so people who donate to Dem candidates should have their
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 03:50 PM
Sep 2012

donations limited, but there shouldn't be any rules for people who donate to Rep candidates. Right.

mnhtnbb

(31,382 posts)
8. Of course! We all know Republican donors are righteous and holy
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 04:00 PM
Sep 2012

only wanting what is best for the country while Democratic donors
are from the devil and hate the USA.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
7. and trees are beautiful and provide shade and
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 04:00 PM
Sep 2012

are useful in a myriad of ways.

I think "stump" is more accurate.

 

berni_mccoy

(23,018 posts)
10. Right. And Corporations should have unrestricted donations... we get you Mitt.
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 04:06 PM
Sep 2012

Mitt is a fucking waste of oxygen.

JBoy

(8,021 posts)
11. Does he purposely going around saying shit that's so transparently hypocritical?
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 04:08 PM
Sep 2012

Simply substitute "oil company" for "teachers union".

sellitman

(11,606 posts)
12. People shouldn't have the same rights as a Corporation giving to GOP Politicians
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 04:15 PM
Sep 2012

Everyone knows that.






















Sekhmets Daughter

(7,515 posts)
14. Who knew
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 04:24 PM
Sep 2012

that the President of the United states sits down at the negotiating table with the Teachers' unions?

Meanwhile Shelley Adelson is doing all possible to see Mitt elected and thus avoid a prosecution for bribing foreign officials in Macau. The real reason, btw, that creep Issa went after Eric Holder...Issa doesn't give a rat's ass about a dead DEA agent.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Mittfuck: Teacher contri...