Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

octoberlib

(14,971 posts)
Sun Oct 11, 2020, 03:08 PM Oct 2020

Pete Buttigieg nicely skewers the illogic of "originalism" as articulated by right wing Justices


?s=20

Tweet thread by Seth Cotlar:

Pete nicely skewers the illogic of "originalism" as articulated by many contemporary conservative jurists.

He's right that many people in the founding generation (like Jefferson and Paine) understood that constitutions would evolve as the societies to which they applied changed. It should go without saying that "loose constructionists" like Hamilton thought the same thing.


There are few ironies more delicious than the fact that many of the best arguments against originalism can be found in the writings of the founders.

The founders disagreed with each other about almost everything. The Constitution was the product of many compromises and authored by committee. The idea that there is even a singular "original intent" to be discerned, let alone definitively nailed down, seems absurd to me.

"Judicial activism" is just a scare term one uses to denigrate a "judicial interpretation" that you disagree with but don't want to argue against, or can't plausibly argue against.

There is zero evidence that the founders intended the Constitution to serve as a document that 5 Supreme Court justices could use to repeatedly nullify attempts to bring the nation's policies and laws into alignment with a changing society.

You'd be hard pressed to find more than a handful of historians of the founding era who see any merit in Scalia-style originalism. Which is ironic, given that Scalia claims to be channeling the spirit and intent of the founding era.

Pete is spot on when he says that "originalism" is conservative judicial activism cloaked in the garb of humility. "It's not me, Scalia, saying this, it's Madison and Hamilton speaking THROUGH me." Such a claim is 100% BS.
26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pete Buttigieg nicely skewers the illogic of "originalism" as articulated by right wing Justices (Original Post) octoberlib Oct 2020 OP
K&R Blue Owl Oct 2020 #1
It always amazed me that 'originalism' hasn't been thoroghly exposed from the empedocles Oct 2020 #2
Mayor Pete can slash people without being mean. Or breaking a sweat. BKDem Oct 2020 #3
If I'm around long enough, am looking forward to voting him into the WH! UTUSN Oct 2020 #4
Me too! nt. Dem2theMax Oct 2020 #13
I'd love to hear him apply that same argument on the 2nd Amendment. brush Oct 2020 #21
I'm glad he's on our side MustLoveBeagles Oct 2020 #5
I'm hoping Pete runs for statewide office in his home state like Senator or Governor Seasider Oct 2020 #6
k&r BootinUp Oct 2020 #7
Gotta say...I'm loving seeing Mayor Pete on all these talk shows. Getting to know him better is BComplex Oct 2020 #8
Oh, the irony! PhylliPretzel Oct 2020 #9
This is why Republicans always chant "judges, judges judges" octoberlib Oct 2020 #12
I think... Mike Nelson Oct 2020 #10
Pete isn't a lawyer. I like him, but a Justice should be jg10003 Oct 2020 #23
Well Said!!! This guy HAS to be in Biden's cabinet!!! grobertj Oct 2020 #11
k&r for visibility alwaysinasnit Oct 2020 #14
"... dead hand originalists..." eleny Oct 2020 #15
Brilliant mind. Pepsidog Oct 2020 #16
Every time Pete makes a statment, my most evolved brain cells jump for joy and I feel like fierywoman Oct 2020 #17
Kick dalton99a Oct 2020 #18
Such a claim is 100% BS. Glaisne Oct 2020 #19
Pete is SO good! elleng Oct 2020 #20
What was the founders' position on the internet practices of Amazon? (xmpl) Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2020 #22
They knew flintlock muskets.... paleotn Oct 2020 #24
Originalism is like a Ouija board.... heckles65 Oct 2020 #25
Wow, he is really sharp... so refreshing to listen to. (n/t) SMC22307 Oct 2020 #26

brush

(53,741 posts)
21. I'd love to hear him apply that same argument on the 2nd Amendment.
Sun Oct 11, 2020, 05:39 PM
Oct 2020

Right winger heads would explode.

MustLoveBeagles

(11,583 posts)
5. I'm glad he's on our side
Sun Oct 11, 2020, 03:20 PM
Oct 2020

He eviscerated the originalism argument in easy to understand terms.I'm so impressed with Pete. I like him even more now than I did in the primaries. I hope he get's a cabinet position in the Biden administration.

Seasider

(168 posts)
6. I'm hoping Pete runs for statewide office in his home state like Senator or Governor
Sun Oct 11, 2020, 03:21 PM
Oct 2020

but my guess is he will take a Secretary of something job in a Biden administration go that route.

BComplex

(8,017 posts)
8. Gotta say...I'm loving seeing Mayor Pete on all these talk shows. Getting to know him better is
Sun Oct 11, 2020, 03:30 PM
Oct 2020

really eye opening. I hope Kamala chooses him for her VP once she's elevated to President. He is the future of politics in the democratic party.

PhylliPretzel

(139 posts)
9. Oh, the irony!
Sun Oct 11, 2020, 03:43 PM
Oct 2020

The founders never wrote "judicial review" into the Constitution; read Article III on the Supreme Court to see for yourself. In 1803 Chief Justice John Marshall claimed in Marbury v. Madison that the Supreme Court, for the first time, may declare an act of Congress void if it is inconsistent with the Constitution. Jefferson was apoplectic.

For Scalia and his ilk to claim "originalism" when judicial review was not in the Constitution is ironic. It also indicates that 5 non-elected judges are the oligarchs of our country, and the people we elect to the Congress do not hold the power.

octoberlib

(14,971 posts)
12. This is why Republicans always chant "judges, judges judges"
Sun Oct 11, 2020, 04:55 PM
Oct 2020

during re-election. A lot of people think it's to satisfy the evangelicals , and it partly is , but the main reason is their big money donors want a conservative Supreme Court to rule in their favor on regulations etc. It's a way for them to control the country when they're not in power, thanks to Marbury vs Madison.


I read a biography on Pinochet and the author wrote about how a group of Republicans went over to Chile to advise him. They were adamant that he had to appoint conservative judges at every level. He did and it messed Chile up for decades, long after Pinochet was out of power.

jg10003

(975 posts)
23. Pete isn't a lawyer. I like him, but a Justice should be
Sun Oct 11, 2020, 06:05 PM
Oct 2020

Educated in the law. Pete's talents are better used elsewhere.

fierywoman

(7,671 posts)
17. Every time Pete makes a statment, my most evolved brain cells jump for joy and I feel like
Sun Oct 11, 2020, 05:16 PM
Oct 2020

my mind is being given access to pure oxygen.

Bernardo de La Paz

(48,955 posts)
22. What was the founders' position on the internet practices of Amazon? (xmpl)
Sun Oct 11, 2020, 06:03 PM
Oct 2020

How many times did they mention crypto-currency?

What restrictions did they suggest for Gene splicing?

Did they believe the armed forces should pay for transgender surgery?

Did they think homosexual people were subhuman like slaves?

paleotn

(17,881 posts)
24. They knew flintlock muskets....
Sun Oct 11, 2020, 07:00 PM
Oct 2020

They had no concept of percussion mechanisms, much less cartridge ammunition. So, all you 2nd Amendment folks out there who hold fast to originalism, you have the right to posses and parade around with a musket. But I warn you, a proficient person can only get off about 3 aimed shots per minute. So if you're contemplating a mass shooting or taking over the Michigan state government, I'd recommend thinking twice.

heckles65

(547 posts)
25. Originalism is like a Ouija board....
Sun Oct 11, 2020, 07:35 PM
Oct 2020

You'll get it to say what you wanted to say in the first place, and claim that a ghost made you say it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Pete Buttigieg nicely ske...