It is UNCONSTITUTIONAL

[Cartaphelius]

for ANY RELIGION to be granted the power to deny/limit my
individual rights ESPECIALLY about my HEALTH CARE to
further their christian BELIEFS.

[Budi]

1. But that will all be changed when the Federalists rule the law of the land.

That is the frightening part.

Anyone can present a case to the SC written to favor the Federalist mantra & the SC will be waiting to rule on it.

[Coleman]

3. The best defense might be

to get Satanists, Muslims, Atheists, and any other group which may disagree with Xians to start denying services to Xians. See a cross, deny your services.

[Budi]

5. Indeed it may just come to that!

[Coleman]

2. We shall see

I agree, but the SC might get enough votes to say we are wrong, that the Establishment Clause prevents the Gov't from interfering with any form of religious expression. Even when denying rights of LGBT, other religions, interracial coupling (look out Thomas)...

[Coleman]

4. Also

Trump should tell MoscowMitch to put the confirmation on hold. He should tell the evangelicals, "If I win, you get ABC. IF I LOSE you will get a pro-separation of church and state nominee, one that would approve taxing churches and deny any capability of the religious to discriminate.

[stopdiggin]

6. and yet -- that is exactly what they did

(laws and courts alike) for 200 years. And -- the current trend is decidedly towards MORE religious influence in those same areas, rather than less.

You (and I) have a struggle ahead of you. ------ ------