Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
83 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I think I know why Romney is not worried about the polls . . . (Original Post) BigBearJohn Sep 2012 OP
Any way they can liberal N proud Sep 2012 #1
Seems to me polls are a tool that tells the powerful what they need to do to accomplish 2on2u Sep 2012 #2
You got it. Turbineguy Sep 2012 #3
Voter Suppression Efforts Yes, Outright Theft Unlikely Flaggkilledgod Sep 2012 #4
Vote flipping *will* occur. It always does. nt valerief Sep 2012 #19
Voter suppression Sekhmets Daughter Sep 2012 #35
Voter Suppression PoliticalBiker Sep 2012 #71
Ask Mike Connell how easy it is to steal an election... Blue State Bandit Sep 2012 #70
Either that or Valium yankeepants Sep 2012 #5
Unrec brooklynite Sep 2012 #6
+1 Chorophyll Sep 2012 #24
Agree to the extent that he will not win BB1 Sep 2012 #25
+1 D23MIURG23 Sep 2012 #37
1. How does "I think" = "we"? 2. Were you not around in 2000 and 2004? WinkyDink Sep 2012 #39
Why yes, I was around... brooklynite Sep 2012 #82
+1M magical thyme Sep 2012 #46
I Hope We Aren't Going To Be Regaled With This Conspiracy Crap For The Next Thirty Nine Days DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2012 #53
Republicrats are conspiracy theory specialists PoliticalBiker Sep 2012 #78
-1 for Dr. Pangloss Jakes Progress Sep 2012 #58
Google Spoonamore and computer vote fraud. It is more than a conspiracy! Dustlawyer Sep 2012 #59
A real temptation to cling to unreality PATRICK Sep 2012 #7
Uh, I don't think it could be much clearer that rMoney is freaked out by the polls. cali Sep 2012 #8
EXACTLY!!!!! get the red out Sep 2012 #13
Yet... PoliticalBiker Sep 2012 #81
If they do, it'll be with a sneer and the finger, 'cuz we took it laying down before dougolat Sep 2012 #9
+1 Scuba Sep 2012 #83
I should point out that though they PLAN to steal the election BigBearJohn Sep 2012 #10
what a novel OP! nobody else has had one with this idea... scheming daemons Sep 2012 #11
Thirty-seven, actually. Come on. Learn to count. randome Sep 2012 #16
thanks. at least I'm not alone. And to think I actually used to admire you. oh well... BigBearJohn Sep 2012 #18
like that.."sarcasm is the lowest form of creativity" I am thinking that it is more Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2012 #40
I don't get your point. Are you saying that DU never has duplicated threads but for this topic? WinkyDink Sep 2012 #42
Nah quaker bill Sep 2012 #12
We all see mstinamotorcity2 Sep 2012 #14
He has to put up a facade of confidence gollygee Sep 2012 #15
This is probably more likely. liberalmuse Sep 2012 #68
I think the margin is too great for them to steal it spinbaby Sep 2012 #17
How would that help him though? Proud Liberal Dem Sep 2012 #28
Actually, the whole thing by him and FOX "News" to deny the polls,... Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2012 #20
It will not come down to just one state this time INdemo Sep 2012 #21
Planning to join any such. elleng Sep 2012 #33
Any lead that's under 5 points The Wizard Sep 2012 #22
That's certainly the meme in the lefter blogosphere. HereSince1628 Sep 2012 #27
Max Cleland was ahead by three The Wizard Sep 2012 #44
I have no doubt that's true HereSince1628 Sep 2012 #47
But then Pbs1914 Sep 2012 #48
Acceptance of a result is indeed all about perception HereSince1628 Sep 2012 #73
I think if Romney were to say "win" a state where polls showed him behind >5%, it might not Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2012 #45
Sorry, but Shaduh! dotymed Sep 2012 #23
They are stealing the money being raised BumRushDaShow Sep 2012 #26
Of course they will try to steal the election, but I don't think you're right about Romney. porphyrian Sep 2012 #29
On the contrary, I think he's plenty worried. MANative Sep 2012 #30
You bet. Between . . . ProfessionalLeftist Sep 2012 #31
Yes, every election it gets worse. elleng Sep 2012 #34
That is what has bothered me for a long asjr Sep 2012 #32
Ok. But that aside, what does everybody expect him to say??? renie408 Sep 2012 #36
I live in historically Democratic Delaware and I have to say I was surprised when cyberpj Sep 2012 #38
Oh he's worried.. that's why they are desperately tying to discredit the polls. DCBob Sep 2012 #41
Gee whiz, I wonder why McCain didn't think of that? n/t D23MIURG23 Sep 2012 #43
They're lulling the opposition into complacency Eddie Haskell Sep 2012 #49
They believe they will buy it lunatica Sep 2012 #50
exactly ann--- Sep 2012 #51
If you don't think they're worried, you haven't been paying attention. Bucky Sep 2012 #52
Rmoney does not have the power Bush did ProudToBeBlueInRhody Sep 2012 #54
I don't scoff at the notion, and they'll try orpupilofnature57 Sep 2012 #61
Exactly !!! Instead of being lulled in to orpupilofnature57 Sep 2012 #55
Sometimes I Think We Are As Bad As The Morons At The Other Site DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2012 #56
So you think it's a paranoid notion ? " Diebold " orpupilofnature57 Sep 2012 #63
No More Or No Less Paranoid Than Believing Millions Of Dead People And Undocumented Aliens Vote DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2012 #65
Millions? orpupilofnature57 Sep 2012 #77
THAT MUST BE IT! CALL CONGRESS RIGHT NOW!!!111!!! slackmaster Sep 2012 #57
Tell it to the guy in the picture on the wall. n/t orpupilofnature57 Sep 2012 #66
Oh, he knows about it. J.R. "Bob" Dobbs knows there is ONLY ONE CONSPIRACY! slackmaster Sep 2012 #69
Devo or NWO what is it ? Lennon or your boy orpupilofnature57 Sep 2012 #76
I praise and honor both Marx and Lennon slackmaster Sep 2012 #79
They may try but there are two things that would probably stop that. Jennicut Sep 2012 #60
Why didn't they steal it for McCain in 2008 if it can be stolen so easily? Lex Sep 2012 #62
Shrub-phobia, we forget too soon, the apparatus of NWO orpupilofnature57 Sep 2012 #74
Yep. liberalmuse Sep 2012 #64
He is worried about the polls... PoliticalBiker Sep 2012 #67
That's why I would like to see the polls so lopsided in Obama's favor that it will Arkansas Granny Sep 2012 #72
Well I say there will be tells if you are correct. zeemike Sep 2012 #75
They'll try brush Sep 2012 #80

liberal N proud

(60,332 posts)
1. Any way they can
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 06:46 AM
Sep 2012

Look at the big swing states and who is in power in those states. It has been clear from the start what they are planning. These people in these state offices are there for a reason.

If we do not get a large turnout and it is not decisive, they will steal this election.

 

2on2u

(1,843 posts)
2. Seems to me polls are a tool that tells the powerful what they need to do to accomplish
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 06:46 AM
Sep 2012

what they want. I think polls should be banned period. Why have 100 pseudo elections before the real election? Just doesn't make sense to me.

 

Flaggkilledgod

(26 posts)
4. Voter Suppression Efforts Yes, Outright Theft Unlikely
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 06:55 AM
Sep 2012

It's far more likely that Romney is shitting himself over the polls and is just doing what he does in response to anything that impacts him negatively, lying about it.

Blue State Bandit

(2,122 posts)
70. Ask Mike Connell how easy it is to steal an election...
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 09:38 AM
Sep 2012

oh, wait. He was killed just before testifing about the "MIM" hacking of the Ohio vote in 2004.



One of Rmoney's political consultants, Strategic Allied Consulting was just busted for registration fraud.

The Republican Party of Florida’s top recipient of 2012 expenditures, a firm by the name of Strategic Allied Consulting, was just fired on Tuesday night, after more than 100 apparently fraudulent voter registration forms were discovered to have been turned in by the group to the Palm Beach County, FL Supervisor of Elections.

The firm appears to be another shell company of Nathan Sproul, a longtime, notorious Republican operative, hired year after year by GOP Presidential campaigns, despite being accused of shredding Democratic voter registration forms in a number of states over several past elections.

According to the Center for Responsive Politics , Strategic Allied Consulting has been paid some $667,000 this year by the Florida GOP, presumably to run its voter registration campaigns in the state. That number, however, does not account for another identical payment made in August. The Palm Beach Post is reporting tonight that the firm received “more than $1.3 million” from the Republican Party of Florida “to register new voters.”

The firm is not only tied to the Florida GOP, but also to the Mitt Romney Campaign, which hired Sproul as a political consultant late last year, despite years of fraud allegations against his organizations in multiple states.

http://www.salon.com/2012/09/26/fla_voter_fraud_charge_has_ties_to_romney/


Attempts at outright theft is all around you.

yankeepants

(1,979 posts)
5. Either that or Valium
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 06:57 AM
Sep 2012

I think his handlers might have him doped up so that he doesn't have another temper tantrum/meltdown and really bury even the chance to steal the election.

Just guessing.

brooklynite

(94,333 posts)
6. Unrec
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 06:59 AM
Sep 2012

Besides the fact that I find conspiracy theory posts really annoying, I really hate ones that offer no evidence whatever, but just assume that "we" all agree.

brooklynite

(94,333 posts)
82. Why yes, I was around...
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 01:22 PM
Sep 2012

...and I was around earlier when Carter and Mondale lost. 95% of the blame for 2000 and 2004 lies with Gore and Kerry (and I volunteered) for running lousy campaigns.

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
46. +1M
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 09:01 AM
Sep 2012

It's not like this is some brilliant new idea that nobody has thought of before.

This stupid conspiracy theory has been pushed in every single freakin' poll thread, plus had multiple threads on its own.

And I say stupid for a reason. It was advanced endlessly in 2008 too. We see how well it worked for McCain/Palin.

PoliticalBiker

(328 posts)
78. Republicrats are conspiracy theory specialists
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 10:07 AM
Sep 2012

Expect it to continue in earnest as long as they are perceived to be behind
When Mittens loses, expect it to continue for some time after as to why
Damn Republicrats and thier surrogates

Jakes Progress

(11,122 posts)
58. -1 for Dr. Pangloss
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 09:24 AM
Sep 2012

If the election is thrown into doubt, will you be one to come on and say "But we had no idea such a thing might happen."?

PATRICK

(12,228 posts)
7. A real temptation to cling to unreality
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 07:00 AM
Sep 2012

when you know you can and are going to cheat even though real numbers are tanking. it must be agony to see the margin slipping away along with the nerve of the operators who have to sneak in somewhat believable restraint in a losing op that could end up with some real consequences(though we have been waiting in vain for this since 2000 at least).

There have actually been the usual signs of desperation denoting a real knowledge of certain defeat. Usually the only hope was to 'turnaround" the whole electoral mindset which for the GOP usually ends up in scolding insults or incredible statements. In a media that is so friendly that the entire cheating advantage for the GOP is never mentioned directly, however, Rmoney must also cooperate by appearing the moderate and seemingly earning the middle that in fact he can never have enough of.

Result: apparent insanity, reliance on nothing but fraud and big money, but deep down going through what Goldwater, Dole and others have with much less talent, intelligence and personal integrity.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
8. Uh, I don't think it could be much clearer that rMoney is freaked out by the polls.
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 07:08 AM
Sep 2012

His re-re-re vamping of his campaign and embrace of "empathy" point to that.

dougolat

(716 posts)
9. If they do, it'll be with a sneer and the finger, 'cuz we took it laying down before
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 07:09 AM
Sep 2012

Last edited Sun Sep 30, 2012, 06:47 AM - Edit history (1)

Richard Hayes Phillips did exhaustive research on 2004.
Book, site, movie:

"A Citizen's Audit of an American Election"
www.witnesstoacrime.com

Elipsis posted it: DU 101738391

























BigBearJohn

(11,410 posts)
10. I should point out that though they PLAN to steal the election
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 07:14 AM
Sep 2012

THIS time I don't believe it will work. But then again,
I never dreamed that in a million years GWB could EVER become President.

Still, it is so damned refreshing to see Obama keep moving UP UP and UP
in the polls.

As for Romney, I seriously doubt whether butter would melt in his mouth.

If he does get in, I'm gettin' out and moving to Thailand.

BigBearJohn

(11,410 posts)
18. thanks. at least I'm not alone. And to think I actually used to admire you. oh well...
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 07:49 AM
Sep 2012

Instead of pissing on my op, why don't you write one of your own?
Sarcasm is the lowest form of creativity.

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
40. like that.."sarcasm is the lowest form of creativity" I am thinking that it is more
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 08:50 AM
Sep 2012

than thinking he will be covered by fraud/election rigging. He doesn't even flinch about the polls. Even if you knew it would be rigged, any normal human would not be able to hide the worry of losing. It might be the slightest "tell", but you could tell. He shows nothing.

quaker bill

(8,224 posts)
12. Nah
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 07:22 AM
Sep 2012

The margin will be too big. They were counting on an election where suppressing 100,000 or so votes here or there would be enough get it done. Millions of votes is just too much to not be detected and I don't think they like Rmoney enough to risk it in the face of that.

Losing candidates never worry about the polls publicly, it makes them sound like a loser. Often they complain about the media and not having enough debates. Rmoney won't be looking for more debates becase Obama will be at the other podium, but he will rail that the polls have it wrong and the media is conspiring against him.

mstinamotorcity2

(1,451 posts)
14. We all see
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 07:30 AM
Sep 2012

what they are trying to do. That is why we must put undeniable numbers at the ballot box. So there is to be no question. That is why we are registering and getting Identifications,and people to the polls. We must work harder than we did in 2008, because the direction of our country depends on it.

liberalmuse

(18,671 posts)
68. This is probably more likely.
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 09:35 AM
Sep 2012

I think his book, "No Apologies" would probably give some insight into his seeming facade of confidence. Although that is starting to crumble if you watch him lately.

spinbaby

(15,088 posts)
17. I think the margin is too great for them to steal it
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 07:47 AM
Sep 2012

What really has me worried in the back of my paranoid little mind is the possibility of an October surprise in the form of an Israeli strike on Iran.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,392 posts)
28. How would that help him though?
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 08:22 AM
Sep 2012

I'm failing to see how. Create an even bigger mess for President Obama to deal with in the ME? Force him into a box in terms of supporting/denouncing Israel's actions. Hopefully, nobody in Israel would be so dumb as to launch military strikes as part of an electoral strategy here in the US for Mitt Romney.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
20. Actually, the whole thing by him and FOX "News" to deny the polls,...
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 07:58 AM
Sep 2012

...is because the big money people are saying "fugetaboutit".

INdemo

(6,994 posts)
21. It will not come down to just one state this time
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 07:59 AM
Sep 2012

So that takes away their advantage to steal...
..but if they were able to pull off another theft I think we would see the biggest uprising in history...Would make the 60's protests look like a family picnic

The Wizard

(12,536 posts)
22. Any lead that's under 5 points
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 08:01 AM
Sep 2012

on election day is subject to rigging as beyond 5 points is beyond the realm of plausible deniability.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
27. That's certainly the meme in the lefter blogosphere.
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 08:17 AM
Sep 2012

I'm not sure where that really comes from other than the practice of sizing sampling populations to give +/- 5% confidence intervals. Consequently there is a belief in the general population that differences can't be statistically significant under 5% difference.

Voter exit polling often includes large enough numbers of actual voters to be quite a bit more precise, even with uncertainty introduced by deceptive responses during exit polling.









The Wizard

(12,536 posts)
44. Max Cleland was ahead by three
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 08:53 AM
Sep 2012

but lost by 2. In two of the counties using Diebold voting machines the numbers were exactly the same.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
47. I have no doubt that's true
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 09:03 AM
Sep 2012

I guess I would say this...a computer flipping subroutine could be set to flip any proportion of votes it encountered.

That has nothing to do with potential exit polling precision which can be much more accurate than 5% with tens of millions of potential respondents.

In vote flipping, the programer must choose a proportion to flip. Why would they choose 5%? Because the American population, including much of the democratic base, thinks that 5% precision is the best exit polling can do and a 'surprise result' of that magnitude would be accepted by the general population even if a discrepancy was detected (as it has been).

It's probably much less about issues of math or sampling, but rather upon the psychology of interpreting and accepting a surprise result.

Pbs1914

(147 posts)
48. But then
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 09:08 AM
Sep 2012

when Kerry was set to win, the memo was "I guess the exit polls were wrong." And that was that. Yep, the exit polls, not the vote itself being rigged was the culprit.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
73. Acceptance of a result is indeed all about perception
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 09:38 AM
Sep 2012

and the public's perception certainly can be wrong and/or helped along to a wrong interpretation of objective reality.

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
45. I think if Romney were to say "win" a state where polls showed him behind >5%, it might not
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 08:55 AM
Sep 2012

cause nationwide outrage. But, what we have on our side is that Obama is leading in multiple states by >5%. The general public may buy one anomaly - but not a handful.

I will definitely be in the streets if this happens

dotymed

(5,610 posts)
23. Sorry, but Shaduh!
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 08:03 AM
Sep 2012

These rich bastards are following the same playbook as 2000 and 2004.
I "think" I am getting through to some of the poor,racist, never voted before people around here. Amazingly it came through a conversation on legalizing marijuana....I hope they wake up and vote.

BumRushDaShow

(128,441 posts)
26. They are stealing the money being raised
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 08:14 AM
Sep 2012

I keep saying it's a Ponzi and expect they are getting interest for it somewhere and will pocket it.

 

porphyrian

(18,530 posts)
29. Of course they will try to steal the election, but I don't think you're right about Romney.
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 08:24 AM
Sep 2012

He is worried, you can see it, despite his best board room faces. He can't keep track of who he's fucking over any more and he's getting attacked at every turn regardless of who he listens to. If there is a plan, his survival isn't part of it. I think they were counting on a much closer election, which makes stealing it easier. As-is, their best efforts are likely to fail if we continue to fight back.

MANative

(4,112 posts)
30. On the contrary, I think he's plenty worried.
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 08:26 AM
Sep 2012

Have you looked at his eyes lately? Margins are getting too big for them to steal.

ProfessionalLeftist

(4,982 posts)
31. You bet. Between . . .
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 08:36 AM
Sep 2012

. . . voter suppression (Voter ID), voter intimidation ("True the Vote&quot , ballot bloat (see FL 10-page ballots), and voter purges, they absolutely plan to steal it. They can't win on their ideas, policies or platform. All they can do is lie and cheat. And every election, it gets worse.

asjr

(10,479 posts)
32. That is what has bothered me for a long
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 08:38 AM
Sep 2012

time. The voting machines have had a good bit of practice so I am certain they are ready to do it again.

renie408

(9,854 posts)
36. Ok. But that aside, what does everybody expect him to say???
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 08:47 AM
Sep 2012

"Yeah, I am running the shittiest campaign EVER and getting my ass totally kicked in the polls!" ???

OF COURSE he says he isn't worried about the polls. If Republicans get disenchanted enough to stay home, he is fucked.

Which is another reason a little confidence can't hurt Dems.

 

cyberpj

(10,794 posts)
38. I live in historically Democratic Delaware and I have to say I was surprised when
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 08:48 AM
Sep 2012

I was driving down a major highway and saw 4 Diebold vans traveling the same roadway with me.

I know it doesn't mean voting machines necessarily.

And I don't think I remember us using electronic machines yet (but perhaps the tabulator are?) ...

But anyway, that's my first association with that name.


DCBob

(24,689 posts)
41. Oh he's worried.. that's why they are desperately tying to discredit the polls.
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 08:51 AM
Sep 2012

He just putting on the false confidence face to keep the troops from bailing on him.

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
50. They believe they will buy it
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 09:12 AM
Sep 2012

Their belief in the power of money knows no bounds. Money is their God. And now that they have the right to use it unobstructed by anything they are buying the Presidency. Or so they believe with every fiber of their beings.

ProudToBeBlueInRhody

(16,399 posts)
54. Rmoney does not have the power Bush did
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 09:19 AM
Sep 2012

If the Rethugs wanted to steal every election, then McCain would be president.

Rmoney is a toady.

It's 2016 they want, and it's Jeb Bush.

 

orpupilofnature57

(15,472 posts)
61. I don't scoff at the notion, and they'll try
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 09:27 AM
Sep 2012

and make life hell until we develop total amnesia of his agenda and bloodline .

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,708 posts)
56. Sometimes I Think We Are As Bad As The Morons At The Other Site
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 09:23 AM
Sep 2012

But in the other direction. Here we discuss Diebold. There they discuss dead people voting and illegal aliens.



 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
69. Oh, he knows about it. J.R. "Bob" Dobbs knows there is ONLY ONE CONSPIRACY!
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 09:37 AM
Sep 2012

The Conspiracy - So vast, so pervasive that ALL of its adherents are perfectly unaware that they have been DUPED!

Jennicut

(25,415 posts)
60. They may try but there are two things that would probably stop that.
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 09:27 AM
Sep 2012

#1, we aren't stupid or naive anymore. And the general public and the media (MSNBC specifically) is not dumb about voter suppression.
#2, this election may not be close enough to really steal.

 

orpupilofnature57

(15,472 posts)
74. Shrub-phobia, we forget too soon, the apparatus of NWO
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 09:42 AM
Sep 2012

is more in place because of paranoid yuppies worrying about their muffy shit and the willingness to look the other way, what ever you fucking like, but it should be discussed and verified without ridicule from within, how soon we forgot.

liberalmuse

(18,671 posts)
64. Yep.
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 09:30 AM
Sep 2012

And my tinfoil hat theory involves the "prophet" of the Mormon church probably telling him he would win. But yes - they are definitely planning on suppressing and stealing as many Democratic votes as they can. But they can only do it up to a point. I read a great article years ago (before the 2008 election) that stated that once outside a certain percentage, it is impossible to steal an election without being caught. I wish I could remember the details. So, we need to get out the vote for President Obama, and up those numbers so that anything they might be planning will be rendered null and void.

Arkansas Granny

(31,506 posts)
72. That's why I would like to see the polls so lopsided in Obama's favor that it will
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 09:38 AM
Sep 2012

be obvious to anyone that the election was stolen if Romney comes out on top.

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
75. Well I say there will be tells if you are correct.
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 09:44 AM
Sep 2012

And the biggest one will be if the polls start to tighten in the next few weeks...making it too close to call.
And we hear the MSM tell us that Romney's message is starting to get through.
If that happens then I will say there is a good chance they intend to steal it.

brush

(53,741 posts)
80. They'll try
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 10:55 AM
Sep 2012

They'll try but it's not going to be close enough. And with all the monitoring and attention to that possibility going into this election, they won't be able to sneak up on us like they did in '04 and '00. Also, don't think they didn't try in '08. I'm pretty sure they did but the election wasn't that close. The President won by some 6-7 points but it was probably more except for the votes they skimmed off. And that is why we have to keep working hard until election day because they will try, we just have to beat their asses good so they won't try it again. Also, this is a turning point for the repug party as it's presently constituted. Latinos, blacks, women, progressive whites, gays and Asian Americans are lost to them. And now some seniors and working class white men (the 47%) are are turning away as the true nature of that party has been revealed. They've been pulling out all the stops to win this time because this is their last chance for a national election unless they drastically change the party to appeal to more than the rich, the racists/teabaggers and deluded people voting against their own economic interests. If they don't win they can't instill permanent national voter ID laws and other measures to insure that they stay in power, but you can bet they have plans to if they win. They won't though so look for major rifts in that party after the election. The beaten back moderates will reappear to appeal for substantive change in policies that might attract some Latinos, blacks, women, progressive whites, gays and Asian Americans. After all you aren't going anywhere as a party by attracting 0% of the black vote while writing off the Latino vote, the fasted growing voting block, with repugnant immigration policies. This might even split that party because those entrenched racists/teabaggers aren't going to want any moderation.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I think I know why Romney...