General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFuck Me. The Dallas Morning News just recommended Mitt Romney.
http://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/editorials/20120928-we-recommend-mitt-romney-for-president.eceBarack Obama will forever be a historic, as well as historical, figure in American life. The 44th U.S. president, yes, but more noteworthy, he will forever be the first African-American to lead a nation riven through centuries by racial and ethnic division.
His election in November 2008 inspired. Even those who may not have supported him could not deny the significance.
With it came an optimism that the ideals he stressed as a candidate, like a post-partisan Washington where Democrats and Republicans worked together, were within reach. He took office amid great turmoil, a crashing economy and two wars atop his priorities.
Candidate Obama, an orator of great skill and cadence, might have overcome everything and put the U.S. on a brighter path. President Obama, unfortunately, fell short of the challenge. The wars have largely faded from headlines, but the economic struggles remain, along with an attendant worry about future federal spending, deficits and debt.
Obamas Democratic supporters would argue that no one could have succeeded in what he inherited, that the nations problems were far more severe than anyone could handle in four years.
We respectfully disagree. On the central issue that will define his presidency a stalled U.S. economy weighed down by crushing annual deficits and accumulated debt Obama showed himself to be less leader than follower. While he expended his political capital on new government programs, unemployment stayed at debilitating heights.
For that reason, this newspaper recommends Republican challenger Mitt Romney for president.
SDjack
(1,448 posts)Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)In 2008 Obama got OVER 3.5 MILLION votes in Texas.
McCain got UNDER 4.5
Obama won the majority of our largest cities/counties: Dallas/Dallas, Austin/Travis, Houston/Harris, El Paso, San Antonio, etc.
So, please lay off the Texas bashing.
Thank you
w8liftinglady
(23,278 posts)and very descriptive.
I think we'll be Blue in the next decade.
Ojala que si.
DiverDave
(4,886 posts)which begs the question-how is he a top commentator if he is a doctor?
Some busy practice he has, humm?
LOL some people are so transparent.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)of Texas turning blue scares the shit out of Republicans that try to take the hardline, and it should. Even states that generally support Republicans are getting fed up with their anti-woman, anti-minority, anti-anybody that isn't a millionaire and white bullshit. The thing with the South is that once we turn, it takes FOREVER to turn us back, and that is what is scaring the shit out of them. Once some in the South get the idea that it is okay to consider the alternative, the Republican party is DOOMED.
bocaoma
(23 posts)same to old mitt this time around!
Aerows
(39,961 posts)And I was just as liberal then as I am now, and have liberal friends in Austin, San Antonio, and Dallas, too. I will never count out my Texan friends, because I am in MS, and in a Red State, but I will turn it blue every single way that I can
WI_DEM
(33,497 posts)WI_DEM
(33,497 posts)presidential candidates.
Raster
(20,998 posts)Last edited Sat Sep 29, 2012, 08:21 PM - Edit history (1)
They've been Bush family boot lickers for years and endorsed John McCain four years ago.
Summary: Quit blaming George Bush* for all the troubles he caused. Obama, how come you haven't fixed everything yet?
Obamas Democratic supporters would argue that no one could have succeeded in what he inherited, that the nations problems were far more severe than anyone could handle in four years.
We respectfully disagree. On the central issue that will define his presidency a stalled U.S. economy weighed down by crushing annual deficits and accumulated debt Obama showed himself to be less leader than follower. While he expended his political capital on new government programs, unemployment stayed at debilitating heights.
For that reason, this newspaper recommends Republican challenger Mitt Romney for president.
Oh yes, all Obama's fault that he could not fix 8 years of astounding bad management by arguably the worst presidential administration in a century in just a four-year span. And let's not talk about also dealing with an obstructionist republican machine in Congress hell-bent on destroying President Obama at any cost. ANY COST, including fucking the country if they deemed it necessary to punish the uppity Black man that the citizens of this country LEGALLY AND LAWFULLY elected.
Fuck The Morning Snooze. I would have been shocked if they had NOT endorsed Rmoney.
Importantly, Romney speaks the language of industry. His tenure leading Bain Capital, for instance, has come under sharp criticism for years, but it also reveals a man who understands capital formation and how that, extrapolated through an economy, can lift the U.S. from its stalled state.
Maybe when Rmoney loses and returns to his plundering and pillaging at Bain, he can turn his black, soul-less eyes toward The Morning Snooze and its parent company.
Let the harvest begin.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)sadbear
(4,340 posts)Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)What's clear - the DMN believes that it's perfectly all right to throw half the country under the bus, as they did by brushing aside Romney's comments.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)a bunch of tools:
<...>
Importantly, Romney speaks the language of industry. His tenure leading Bain Capital, for instance, has come under sharp criticism for years, but it also reveals a man who understands capital formation and how that, extrapolated through an economy, can lift the U.S. from its stalled state. Even some of Obamas Democratic allies notably rising star Cory Booker, former adviser Steven Rattner and former Rep. Harold Ford were quick to criticize the campaigns Bain-centric attacks on profit.
<...>
Obamas Affordable Care Act was his signature domestic achievement. Its many laudable features included the individual mandate, but one was not its financing, which led this newspaper to oppose it. Obama left the details to Congress, and what emerged had no realistic funding stream and did too little to contain future costs.
Of most concern, Obama was not unaware of the fiscal problem. He put together a bipartisan panel to help forge a solution but then abandoned it. Left to languish, the Simpson-Bowles group could not achieve the votes to force congressional action. The proposal, which included a roughly 3-to-1 package of spending cuts to revenue increases, was the kind of compromise candidate Obama had advocated. As president, he chose not to act.
Summary: Obama is mean. Romney is wonderful, see Bain. Health care reform sucks. We love Simpson-Bowles.
kstewart33
(6,551 posts)Having lived there for nine years before moving on, I can't imagine they'd ever endorse Obama. Dallas is business, and Romney is a businessman. They're as likely to endorse Obama as Obama is to win Texas.
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)Whovian
(2,866 posts)Joey Liberal
(5,526 posts)But there are a lot of good Dems there.
w8liftinglady
(23,278 posts)Auntie Bush
(17,528 posts)It's kind of full at the moment. I could have a garage sale.
w8liftinglady
(23,278 posts)Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)rainbow4321
(9,974 posts)No matter that the state's economy and everything else here crashes and burns between elections, they ALWAYS endorse the repuke side. Always. Sure, they will have article after article after article about how bad things are between elections but, by gosh, they get amnesia around all of our elections and national elections and endorse the repuke.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)that they know Mittwit is screwed. I mean, they waited until after the debates to endorse McCain.
This seems like Operation Rescue Mitt, a desperate attempt to give Mitt a boost.
Look people, tools still support Mittwit!!!
w8liftinglady
(23,278 posts)Ishoutandscream2
(6,660 posts)LuckyLib
(6,817 posts)Damned by faint praise. Endorsement indeed . . .
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)or some financial link to Romney
RBInMaine
(13,570 posts)Bolo Boffin
(23,796 posts)w8liftinglady
(23,278 posts)Bolo Boffin
(23,796 posts)Say hey over at the DMN. That fool endorsement didn't say a single thing new and glided over so much.
blogslut
(37,985 posts)Betcha the Houston Chronicle endorses Obama - again.
Historic NY
(37,449 posts)they mean the same assholes that sponsor China junkets to drum up offshore business.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)Ishoutandscream2
(6,660 posts)Bookmark it!
w8liftinglady
(23,278 posts)or in Texas...we'll be blue in a decade...you are correct!
Manifestor_of_Light
(21,046 posts)That's what my dad always called the DMN.
The Houston Chron has always endorsed right-wing candidates who sometimes lose, at least in Houston. It's a Hearst paper, no surprise.
bluestate10
(10,942 posts)have had W or Rick Perry. If the LA Times, The NY Times, the Washington Times or the Boston Globe endorse Romney, then there would be a problem.
RandySF
(58,511 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)It supported Bush Jr., too. It's a Republican paper.
I've been asked a couple of times in grocery stores to sign up for a subscription. I told them both times that I refuse to subscribe because it's not a fair and balanced paper and is Republican, while I am not. They disagreed with me...it's fair & balanced! I pointed out that...get real, it threw its support behind Bush in '04, and almost the ONLY paper in the country to support McCain in '08! If that's not Republican, I don't know what is.
It also backs every Republican-backed special project in the area...a new football stadium, an expensive river project, privatizing this and that.
bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)It's a cocktail party elite thing.
jsr
(7,712 posts)Elwood P Dowd
(11,443 posts)his first two years. You need 60 Dems in the Senate and the most Obama had was 58 for a short period of time before Ted passed. The rest of the time he only had 57.
HughBeaumont
(24,461 posts)Given Obama's Third Way Worthless-to-Repuke regressive congress he's been saddled with, it's a wonder ANYthing got done.
Skittles
(153,122 posts)RagAss
(13,832 posts)HughBeaumont
(24,461 posts)It's not going to be like 2004, where wingnut Machaskee ordered his 3-2 in favor of Kerry editorial board "The PD endorses Bush or endorses NO ONE!" They endorsed no one.
So much wrong with this editorial, it wouldn't be worth the waste of clerical work to destroy it.
Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)Just do the exact opposite of whatever they say is the correct course of action, and you'll do all right every single time.
xfundy
(5,105 posts)Most newspapers are dying in the USA. That was by design of the cons who struck out against "librul" news, yet they still deride the con-corruped librul news when they don't toe the line on every story.
It's horrible that most papers barely report local news and reacted to the "librul media" charge by getting more cancervative, even when they knew doing that meant printing all kinds of lies and invective.
So, go away, fishwrap/birdcage liner.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)So big deal, we know they haven't a clue!!
Blecht
(3,803 posts)Not good enough for fish wrap or bird cages.
DisabledAmerican
(452 posts)Dallas has been turning Blue for a long time now. It's more blue then it was when I lived there. Breath and forget about papers go get people to vote for Obama drive them to the polls.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)blm
(113,016 posts)the Senate for 2 years. Only towards the end of 2010 did the Dems have 24 working days of a Super majority and that is why GOPs were successful in blocking so many bills. People forget that Coleman kept Franken out of his seat till summer of 2009, and that both Kennedy and Byrd were seriously ill for some time before they passed on.
The GOP knew exactly what it was doing when it pushed the BIG LIE that Obama could do anything he wanted the first two years - it makes them appear completely innocent of their constant blocking we all KNOW they did.
GOP knows the LAZY MEDIA will repeat their big lie over and over again. Dallas Morning News is a waste of ink and paper.
regnaD kciN
(26,044 posts)Surely, nobody who wasn't connected to the campaign could write that with a straight face.
roody
(10,849 posts)lunatica
(53,410 posts)Safetykitten
(5,162 posts)Overseas
(12,121 posts)porphyrian
(18,530 posts)otohara
(24,135 posts)the newspaper biz - is hanging on by a thread
WI_DEM
(33,497 posts)McCain last time, too. this is much ado about nothing. The surprise would have been if it had endorsed Obama.
jsr
(7,712 posts)Hutzpa
(11,461 posts)I'll become worried.
They endorsed Bill White a democrat running for Governor, it made no difference, he lost.
Nothing to see here, besides, news paper endorsement is not what it use to be as social media has taken all their
mojo.
mnhtnbb
(31,374 posts)Fuck the Dallas Morning News.
DirkGently
(12,151 posts)a good speaker? He's ... articulate?
There's plenty I don't like about what Obama has done, the deals he's made, and the policies he's embraced. But he's far more than an orator. He's a highly skilled politician who has made progress against unprecedented, monolithic opposition, in the face of the worst economic circumstances in 80 years.
The Republican strategy to just stop anything from happening and let the bad economy their own policies and leaders largely created doom Obama is a failure. We have modest healthcare reform that already no one is willing to do without. We are out of Bush's horrendous, needless war. We have, belatedly, some basic social strides for gay people. All this in the face of nonstop filibusters, a stunningly anti-democratic Supreme Court, and some of the wildest, most racist mythology we've seen directed at a President.
And the last thing anyone can effectively blame Obama for is the economy. He didn't have the ability to undig the hole he inherited -- no one would have -- but getting the American auto industry off life support was a huge achievement that Republicans said couldn't and shouldn't be done.
He's left the Republicans nowhere to go. They're left arguing against lower insurance costs and better benefits, wishing GM had failed, inveighing against birth control, and agitating for war with Iran. No one wants what they're selling. They can't even "articulate" what their solutions are. Because they never thought that far. They thought they could tread water and obstruct and keep things bad enough that an incumbent would automatically lose.
They were wrong.