General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAnalysis: Polling criticism unfounded
snip
Washington (CNN) It's a conspiracy theory of the highest level: media organizations allegedly manipulating data in public opinion polls to try and help President Barack Obama win a second term. Democracy crushed.
The accusations are predicated on the idea that some media organizations are interviewing too many Democrats in their surveys, which skew the results in way to benefit Obama over Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney.
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/09/28/analysis-polling-criticism-unfounded/?hpt=hp_t2
Frustratedlady
(16,254 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)<snip>
Party identification is basically an attitudinal variable, not a stable population parameter. It is designed to vary. This is distinct from demographic variables such as age, gender, race/ethnicity, and education, which are, generally speaking, stable indicators measured by the U.S. Census Bureau. The only issues relating to demographic variables are measurement concerns -- e.g., how the census, which creates the targets, measures ethnicity versus how individual pollsters measure it. But, generally speaking, these are fairly stable targets.
<snip>
Here is how Gallup asks party identification: In politics, as of today, do you consider yourself a Republican, a Democrat, or an independent?
Note that this question does not ask, What was your party identification in November 2008? Nor does it ask, Are you registered with one party or the other in your state? Our question uses the words "as of today" and "consider." It is designed to measure fluidity in political self-identification.
We know that party identification moves over time -- sometimes in very short periods of time, just like other political variables. Generally, if there is a political tide toward either of the two major parties, all questions we ask that are of a political nature will move in that direction. This includes the ballot, job approval, party identification, among others.
So, it would not be surprising to find that if Barack Obama is enjoying a surge in popularity in any given state, that surge will show up on the ballot question, on his job approval measure, and on the measure of party identification. So, data showing that Obama is ahead on the ballot in a specific state poll and that Democrats have a higher-than-expected representation on the party identification question, are basically just reflecting two measures of the same underlying phenomenon.
more: http://pollingmatters.gallup.com/2012/09/the-recurring-and-misleading-focus-on.html