Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

littlemissmartypants

(22,531 posts)
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 05:17 AM Sep 2012

Loop the Loop, DNA Style: One Or Two-Way Transcription Depends On Gene Loops

ScienceDaily (Sep. 28, 2012) — Scientists at EMBL and Oxford University discovered that, by forming or undoing gene loops, cells manipulate the path of the transcription machinery -- which reads out instructions from DNA -- controlling whether it moves along the genetic material in one direction or two.

In certain toy racecar tracks, sneaky players can flip a switch, trapping their opponents' vehicles in a loop of track. Cells employ a less subtle approach: they change the track's layout. In a study published online September 28 in Science, scientists at the European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL) and Oxford University discovered that, by forming or undoing gene loops, cells manipulate the path of the transcription machinery -- which reads out instructions from DNA -- controlling whether it moves along the genetic material in one direction or two.





http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/09/120928085218.htm
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Loop the Loop, DNA Style: One Or Two-Way Transcription Depends On Gene Loops (Original Post) littlemissmartypants Sep 2012 OP
thank you for all your postings MrYikes Sep 2012 #1
Thank you for not adding (sarcasm) to that sentence. littlemissmartypants Sep 2012 #2
I agree...thank you for your postings.. nenagh Sep 2012 #4
Fascinating, a switch. You knew there had to be one. nt bemildred Sep 2012 #3
bemildred for littlemissmartypants Sep 2012 #5

littlemissmartypants

(22,531 posts)
2. Thank you for not adding (sarcasm) to that sentence.
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 07:36 AM
Sep 2012

I just thought when I found this what a simple change with the possibility of huge consequences.

nenagh

(1,925 posts)
4. I agree...thank you for your postings..
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 07:46 AM
Sep 2012

We have so much to learn ... I'm bookmarking this info..

Thanks again

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Loop the Loop, DNA Style:...