Nevada Republicans are sloppy.

[RandySF]

Link to tweet

?s=20

Nate Silver
@NateSilver538
This is semi-interesting.

In Nevada, 1.4% of mail ballots so far required a signature cure, when the voter didn't sign the ballot or the sig didn't match the one on file.

Dems have cured 51% of their rejected ballots so far, vs. 35% for Republicans.

[safeinOhio]

1. Be great if that flipped the vote.

It's always in the details.

[Mike 03]

2. It's amazing, the level of detail about this process we have access to this election year.

[Cha]

3. That real Sloppy and Interesting!

[BSdetect]

4. 51% of how many rejected Dem ballots? Why were they rejected at first?

I hope it was two or three.

[Renew Deal]

5. Glad it's better or for us, but I don't like that they throw out ballots for this.

Assuming our pool of ballots isn’t larger.

[jaxexpat]

6. Doesn't sound right. After all, how many ways are there to make an "X"?

Even Republicans should be able to do that.

[groundloop]

7. I have to wonder about the qualifications of people looking at signatures

I really really doubt that many (or any) of them are trained in signature analysis, plus it's a known fact that people's signatures change over time (mine certainly has). Plus, I strongly suspect that in many places a "Letitia" gets closer scrutiny than a "Mary".