"If we win on Tuesday or -- thank you very much, Supreme Court -- shortly thereafter..."

[mahatmakanejeeves]

Americans, please take this seriously:

Trump just said it at Reading PA rally:
“If we win on Tuesday or — thank you very much, Supreme Court — shortly thereafter…"

Link to tweet

[redstatebluegirl]

1. He has gotten promises from the three he put on the court that they will help him cheat.

I have no doubt about this what so ever.

[Borchkins]

2. Add Alito and Thomas

and he's at a majority. Makes me sick. The blue wave has to be too big to fail.

[exboyfil]

3. So we expect an ethical response from Thomas or Alito

God we are so screwed.

I think maybe Gorsuch isn't as tainted as the other two.

[beachbumbob]

4. supreme court will have NO say on the outcome

[soothsayer]

5. Daniel Dale provides context that makes it less nefarious

Link to tweet

?s=21


Daniel Dale
@ddale8
·
Oct 31, 2020
The context here: Trump had just been (wrongly) blaming the Court decisions for us not having a winner on Election Night - in this line, he was sarcastically saying, like, thank you very much Supreme Court, we’ll now have to wait. Wasn’t saying Court would make him president.

Michael Beschloss
@BeschlossDC
Trump just said it at Reading PA rally:
“If we win on Tuesday or — thank you very much, Supreme Court — shortly thereafter…"

Daniel Dale
@ddale8
Sequence: Trump had asked the crowd, wouldn’t you like to know the winner on Nov. 3? Then suggested it’s Supreme Court’s fault we might not. Then sarcastically said “thank you very much, Supreme Court,” we might have to wait until “shortly thereafter” until we find out we win.

[mahatmakanejeeves]

7. Thanks. I can now turn back my level of paranoia to 18.3 from 19.2 on a scale of 1 to 10. NT