General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPelosi Calls Amy Coney Barrett an 'Illegitimate Supreme Court Justice'
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Tuesday called newly confirmed Justice Amy Coney Barrett an illegitimate Supreme Court justice.
The president is installing an illegitimate Supreme Court justice just one week before the election, Pelosi said during an Election Day news conference with the chairwoman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, Illinois congresswoman Cheri Bustos.
Pelosi claimed that Barrett will vote to dismantle the Affordable Care Act and noted that the judge declined to say whether she thought Medicare was constitutional during her confirmation hearings last month.
The Senate confirmed Barrett to the Supreme Court in a 52-to-48 vote last week, giving conservatives a 6-to-3 majority on the court. Senator Susan Collins of Maine was the only Republican to vote against Barretts confirmation.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/pelosi-calls-amy-coney-barrett-an-illegitimate-supreme-court-justice/ar-BB1aESBb?li=BBnbfcQ&ocid=DELLDHP
BSdetect
(8,998 posts)Kingofalldems
(38,452 posts)roscoeroscoe
(1,370 posts)Perjury, perjury, perjury!
BSdetect
(8,998 posts)Budi
(15,325 posts)dawg
(10,624 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)refused to conduct legitimate "job interviews" for all 3 of the last nominees, allowing them all to refuse to answer many questions, hiding information about them to keep it from being brought out, and even allowing lies under oath in some cases, their confirmations are all illegitimate for that reason alone.
And then there are so many others, like what Pelosi is pointing out.
procon
(15,805 posts)Someone needed to speak the truth.
Cha
(297,176 posts)ecstatic
(32,691 posts)And is calling it exactly how she sees it.
Oh, and pack'em baby! I'm thinking 21 seats sounds about right. Lol!
marybourg
(12,622 posts)CrispyQ
(36,460 posts)brush
(53,771 posts)Hermit-The-Prog
(33,328 posts)lunatica
(53,410 posts)Beer Bong Weenie Waver!!
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,328 posts)About impeaching Justice Beer Bong Weenie Waver
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100212466681
(Just noticed: The "66681" at the end of that link seem appropriate -- that's when the demons behind Rotten Ronnie began this era of assault on government, courts, and voters. )
NYC Liberal
(20,135 posts)Everything he's done since 1/20/2017 is illegitimate.
brush
(53,771 posts)And that fat fuck royally screwed up everything. Everything.
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)That weird woman repukes pushed through belongs in a padded cell, not on ANY judicial bench!
pandr32
(11,581 posts)Pelosi doesn't make slips. She is signaling position and I interpret it as meaning we will challenge the legitimacy of Barrett's appointment in order to toss her ass out.
Stinky The Clown
(67,792 posts)Nancy knows EXACTLY what she wants to communicate.
pandr32
(11,581 posts)lunatica
(53,410 posts)Nancy always talks deliberately and with forethought. Always.
I am starting to believe it is all going to be okay. Our team's got this.
The Magistrate
(95,247 posts)I recommend repeated impeachments, one after another, over trifles, with the Senate requiring attendance of the impeached, till the message is got across and a resignation tendered. There is no bar to this, it is quite permissible under the Constitution.
"What is not forbidden is required."
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,328 posts)Speaker Pelosi may be signalling her willingness to put that tool to use removing some wingnuts.
Greybnk48
(10,167 posts)We need to stand up to what McConnell did this time! Throw her off the court.
ancianita
(36,039 posts)NYC Liberal
(20,135 posts)She definitely made some statements last year before the impeachment inquiry that in hindsight were hints of what was coming.
ancianita
(36,039 posts)and on the premise that if Democrats win a majority in the Senate, that judicial reform will be the work of Congress if Joe wins. I hope she makes it the first order of business. Because nothing else Democrats do will get cooperation unless Republicans know they haven't any recourse with a newly expanded SCOTUS.
It's my hope that Republicans' penchant for political drama will damp down with the knowledge that they AND their owner/donors can't fight the Democratic legislative agenda, but one never knows with those captured corporatist jackals.
NYC Liberal
(20,135 posts)ancianita
(36,039 posts)I've had passing experience with House rules, and it shows.
LiberalLovinLug
(14,173 posts)See what kind of reaction she gets.
That will determine the next step
world wide wally
(21,741 posts)Nothing worse than a holier than thou ultraconservative
demtenjeep
(31,997 posts)he should never have been allowed them
jcgoldie
(11,631 posts)That statement is a preview of coming attractions.
calimary
(81,220 posts)Tell him or her that Nancys right, that you agree, and that he or she should stand with our Speaker!
Joinfortmill
(14,417 posts)Aviation Pro
(12,163 posts)...Don't fuck with Speaker Pelosi.
ancianita
(36,039 posts)I can't wait.
Loge23
(3,922 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,144 posts)There was a headline this AM, suddenly, that 10 Republican Senate seats are in doubt. First time I heard the MSM report it.
Pelosi here is using a term Schumer has used on Twitter for weeks: illegitimate.
I almost feel like the whole structure of our society is closing ranks, and that Donald Trump, and the Republican Senate that failed to convict and remove him, are being set up as
THE LAST TO FIND OUT!
Kick it in high gear folks. This is historic stuff that will strengthen the USA. This is the windup of 40 years of lies sold as greed is good and pass us the money, all the while taking it from working people. We've had all we're gonna take.
JudyM
(29,233 posts)Hekate
(90,660 posts)NoRoadUntravelled
(2,626 posts)almost four years would have been like without her.
Harker
(14,015 posts)There's work to be done!
paleotn
(17,912 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,144 posts)If the whole election is headed to the SCOTUS, could illegitimacy surface and result in spontaneous impeachment? Play this game like Mitch - he did.
azureblue
(2,146 posts)Amy, please quote Matthew 25: 31- 46 to the court. Note the Bible says these are the words of Jesus telling his followers - Christians- to take care of the sick, the poor, etc. under punishment of eternal hell. Now please explain how you, as a Christian will use the teachings of your Lord and Savior, when you rule on the ACA? Will you strike down the ACA, and condemn yourself to hell? Will you affirm the ACA and prove you are a true Christian and not one who just likes the name but refuses to do what Jesus commands?
yuiyoshida
(41,831 posts)N/t