Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

joshcryer

(62,269 posts)
1. This is so tenuous. He says...
Tue Nov 3, 2020, 10:50 PM
Nov 2020

...we missed the Latino/Cuban vote, but somehow this could mean something about the Midwestern suburbs?

Claustrum

(4,845 posts)
2. Biden has always been behind on Latino votes but made gains on suburban women.
Tue Nov 3, 2020, 10:51 PM
Nov 2020

That's known for weeks, we just didn't think it was that bad in FL.

 

PTWB

(4,131 posts)
5. Florida
Tue Nov 3, 2020, 10:52 PM
Nov 2020

Biden’s deficit in FL is far greater than the Miami Dade Cuban shortfall.

There’s a bigger polling miss going on somewhere.

 

PTWB

(4,131 posts)
8. Yah
Tue Nov 3, 2020, 10:55 PM
Nov 2020

Trump is up like 300,000 in FL. Way more than the Miami Dade shortfall. We are seeing a polling miss with the independent voters.

 

NorthOf270

(290 posts)
4. One state doesn't exactly translate to another.
Tue Nov 3, 2020, 10:52 PM
Nov 2020

What happens in Kansas might not effect a suburb in Michigan or Ohio or whomever....

Also Kansas has been subtle in trending blue, because of ages of horrible Rethug rule.

a kennedy

(29,642 posts)
7. Ya right, like I'm going to believe whatever Nate EVER SAYS AGAIN
Tue Nov 3, 2020, 10:54 PM
Nov 2020

but so sorry, am I being a defeated Democrat again, ya know kinda like 20 gawd damn 16?? AND DAMN RIGHT I’M PISSED.

regnaD kciN

(26,044 posts)
9. If it turns out as we fear, the fault won't lie with Nate or any of the other correlating sites...
Tue Nov 3, 2020, 11:02 PM
Nov 2020

They deserve fault for 2016, because they took what was a close race with polling going in different directions, and put together the big picture wrong.

This time, the issue would be that the polls were quite clear-cut and virtually all in agreement, and all would have had to turned out to be drastically wrong.

If 45 wins again, the ones needing to take a long, hard look at themselves are the polling organizations, who seem to have all been off-base. If the raw data you're given is wrong, then it doesn't matter how you combine it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Interesting tidbit from N...