General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMichael Moore
2 months ago
Michael Moore sounds alarm on Biden's campaign in Michigan: 'Its actually worse than Hillary's'
6 days ago
Michael Moore doesn't believe the polls showing Biden ahead of Trump
9 hours ago
Michael Moore predicts Biden victory in post-election night analysis
Oh, Michael!
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Buckeye_Democrat
(14,852 posts)StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)He's usually wrong. He's not a soothsayer. There are only two outcomes. Every year, he picks the same one - the Democrats are going to lose. Sometimes he's right. Usually, he's wrong.
In other words, he's just about as reliable a prognosticator as a coin toss. I don't know why anyone pays attention to him.
LizBeth
(9,952 posts)relayerbob
(6,537 posts)Can't stand the guy
tman
(983 posts)Biden & Obama rally a few days before election shows Biden's team didn't take it for granted.
fishwax
(29,148 posts)that it was closer than the polls were showing and closer than the media discussion would have you believe. That's what Michael Moore said on Brian Williams and that's what the texts and social media posts from Biden and Harris kept telling me.
People here were quick to pooh-pooh the idea, but it was clearly true.
Moore's message and the Biden/Harris message shared another point of overlap: get to the polls and get your friends to the polls and we'll be able to pull this out.
And that was true too.
PTWB
(4,131 posts)When it is unpleasant truth.
melody
(12,365 posts)localroger
(3,622 posts)...but he's usually either right or trying to get us to do something we badly need to do.
Laffy Kat
(16,373 posts)He's pretty savvy, IMO. It doesn't matter if people like him or not.
CatLady78
(1,041 posts)StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)and a whole lot of people on the ground were saying.
I don't know why people think Moore is an oracle.
miyazaki
(2,239 posts)There's a virtual stoning of him and Bill Mahr here about once a week.
Nothing new.
Raine
(30,540 posts)Gothmog
(144,920 posts)Moore is not credible. This person supported Nader. His last couple of movies have been complete flops
PTWB
(4,131 posts)I dont always agree with his choices but hes got his finger on the pulse of whats really happening with voters and turnout and what messages are resonating (and which ones arent).
Gothmog
(144,920 posts)I find this person to be very weak and wrong on almost every thing. This person supported Nader. That disqualifies this person as a source. Again I cannot stand this person and change the channel when this person is on.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)But the fact that he was right once makes people treat him like he had some special insights.
Gothmog
(144,920 posts)I do not understand people who find this "person" to be credible.
localroger
(3,622 posts)Gothmog
(144,920 posts)Again, I do not understand why anyone thinks that this "person" is credible. I have not found this "person" to be right about anything including his clami that it was a good move to support Nader.
localroger
(3,622 posts)Referring to another human being as if they are not human, or as an animal or inanimate object, is the rhetoric of violence and totalitarianism. It is what our enemies do. Cut it the fuck out.
As for Moore being wrong about everything, the fact that he is about the only person who predicted that Trump might actually win in 2016 kind of knocks that over, even if it's the only thing he was ever right about in his entire life. That kind of shreds someone's credibility here, but it's not Moore's.
Gothmog
(144,920 posts)I turn off MSNBC when this person is on and will continue to do so.
Takket
(21,528 posts)you heard it here last!!!!!!!!!!!
Gothmog
(144,920 posts)I change channels whenever he is on MSNBC
AmericanCanuck
(1,102 posts)and never talk to the press again
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,153 posts)Oh well.
Well always have Canadian Bacon, I suppose.
Gothmog
(144,920 posts)I was amused that this film did so poorly
betsuni
(25,380 posts)"I've come to the conclusion that the old guard of the Democratic Party is a greater roadblock to social progress than Trump is."
Oh, Michael. That's show business!
anamnua
(1,103 posts)who warned against complacency and flattering polls in the final weeks who saved our bacon here.
RandiFan1290
(6,221 posts)StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)I don't know anyone who was complacent. We were too busy working our asses off and trying to tune out the noise being ginned up by self-appointed "experts" like Moore giving us unneeded advice and instructions from the sidelines.
JI7
(89,240 posts)StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)he's treated as some kind of a soothsayer - never mind that he's wrong more often than he's right.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)I can't stand to look at him. He's disgusting.
malaise
(268,698 posts)marmar
(77,056 posts)mtnsnake
(22,236 posts)MM is way more of a positive for Democrats than a negative. There is no doubt about that. I think some people get upset with him the second one of his opinions doesn't live up to their own ideals, even if they agree with him about everything else.
although I think it's simply when he disagrees with them on anything.
I think some people get upset with him the second one of his opinions doesn't live up to their own ideals
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)His negativity is divisive and has LONG TERM negative effects. He does NOTHING to promote unity or cohesiveness. He does nothing to promote trust and cooperation. He does, however, PROMOTE HIMSELF.
He has NOTHING positive to offer, only ridicule and that typical "I know better than you" attitude and talking-down to our respected and experienced party leaders. He's as bad as some politicians. Truly divisive with no redeeming value.
What useful purpose does it serve? It's just another example of how people are oddly willing to do and say things that create an atmosphere of fear and hopelessness and negativity. Negativity generates apathy. Apathy discourages voter turnout. Low voter turnout gives Republicans a chance to steal the elections.
LiberalFighter
(50,783 posts)He is not good for the country.