Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

WSHazel

(159 posts)
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 11:47 AM Nov 2020

Murkowski and Romney

Is there a deal with the devil to be made in the Senate?

Romney is a lot more moderate than the rest of the GOP. He will be 77 when his term ends, is worth $250 million, and doesn't need this shit of working with a party that hates him. I think the chance of him running again is slim to none.

Murkowski is going to get a primary challenge in 2022. She dodged the last one 10 years ago by running as a write-in, and pulled it off, but the Democrats are going to be prepared for a split GOP this time and will have a real candidate to try to steal a seat.

What if Romney and Murkowski switched to independents, and caucused with Democrats for leadership, or even split the leadership of the Senate? I am thinking of ANYTHING to get Mitch McConnell out of the Majority Leader position.

Obviously, Ossoff and Warnock sweeping Georgia are Plan A, but Schumer's leverage is at its highest if he goes to Murkowski and Romney right now with an offer.

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

dawg day

(7,947 posts)
1. I suspect at the least Romney will vote to approve the cabinet
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 11:48 AM
Nov 2020

He's not going to try to block governance for McConnell's sake.

Under The Radar

(3,401 posts)
2. I don't think either of them have shown signs
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 11:50 AM
Nov 2020

....of completely breaking free of Mitch McConnell’s death grip.

WSHazel

(159 posts)
3. They have nothing to gain by supporting McConnell
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 11:52 AM
Nov 2020

and nothing to lose by abandoning him. They are definitely both Republicans from a policy standpoint, but they could wield a lot more power as independents caucusing with Democrats than as Republicans.

Under The Radar

(3,401 posts)
5. You don't understand the power of McConnell
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 11:59 AM
Nov 2020

You don’t get re elected if you cross him. A senate election for a seat in one of the smallest States is still $100 million dollar race. Susan a Collins race is an example of that. Collins constituents don’t have that kind of money and she certainly isn’t independently wealthy. Mitch controls the valves for the flow of money to Senate Candidates. If you are a good boy he will make you rich, if not , then you will be unemployed.
Welcome to the NFL

WSHazel

(159 posts)
10. You are missing my point
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 12:05 PM
Nov 2020

Murkowski is finished within the GOP no matter what she does. She is going to get a Republican primary challenge in 2022, and she is probably going to lose to that challenger. Her ONLY chance of staying in office after 2022 is as an Independent caucusing with Democrats.

Romney has $250 million in the bank and will be 77 at the end of his term. There is almost no chance he is running again, so he can do whatever he wants. He certainly doesn't need to take any shit from McConnell.

Under The Radar

(3,401 posts)
14. Valid points, but Murkowski 1st announced her opposition
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 12:12 PM
Nov 2020

...to the nomination of a Ginsberg replacement siting that it violated the Republican Rule after the Garland block, “what’s fair is fair” but then days before the confirmation vote she changed her mind.
It wasn’t an election year for her seat, but she reversed her position. Why?

ProudMNDemocrat

(16,730 posts)
6. Susan Collins sold her soul to Mitch.
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 12:00 PM
Nov 2020

Let her spend the next 6 years being "concerned".

The verdict is out on Romney and Murkowski. It will be interesting to see who runs against her in a Primary in the post-Trump era.

ProudMNDemocrat

(16,730 posts)
9. The ONLY thing she did right....
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 12:05 PM
Nov 2020

She voted NOT to convict on 2 charges of impeachment, however.

She voted to confirm both Gorsuch and Kavanaugh, though she was very "concerned" about Kavanaugh.

Zambero

(8,962 posts)
4. Collins would seem more plausible
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 11:59 AM
Nov 2020

Last edited Sun Nov 8, 2020, 01:57 PM - Edit history (1)

If Schumer was to consider her Senate tenure and seniority while offering a committee chairmanship as an independent caucusing with Dems, she would be able to gain power and influence on behalf of her state. A similar pitch was made by Tom Daschle to Jim Jeffords, a moderate GOP Senator from Vermont in 2001. Jeffords accepted, switched caucuses, and provided Democrats a working 51-49 Senate majority. The question with Collins could be more ideological, in terms of whether she would be "moderate" enough to consider or be considered for this sort of overture.

Polybius

(15,336 posts)
8. 77 is nothing in the Senate
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 12:05 PM
Nov 2020

Romney also aged phenomenally. He'll run again, and maybe again after that.

WSHazel

(159 posts)
11. It is not a question of if he can do it
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 12:08 PM
Nov 2020

it is a question of why would he do it? He has a wife with MS and more money than he could spend in 10 lifetimes. Why would he stay in a Senate where his own party hates him?

I don't think he is returning to the Senate after his term is up. He is a perfect target for Schumer.

Polybius

(15,336 posts)
13. Power
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 12:10 PM
Nov 2020

Being a Senator is an awesome job, you just don't want to retire. I wouldn't. Look at Grassley and Feinstein. Both don't need the money and are in their late 80's.

The only way Romney doesn't return is if he loses a conservative primary in 2024.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Murkowski and Romney