Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nevilledog

(51,030 posts)
Sat Nov 14, 2020, 12:53 PM Nov 2020

Marc Elias: We have moved to dismiss the GOP lawsuit in Georgia



Tweet text:
Marc E. Elias
@marceelias
🚨We have moved to dismiss the GOP lawsuit in Georgia seeking to to stop the certification of presidential election results from certain Democratic counties.

🚨ALERT: NEW LAWSUIT IN GEORGIA
Latest lawsuit filed in Georgia challenging 2020 election results.
democracydocket.com
9:28 AM · Nov 14, 2020
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Marc Elias: We have moved to dismiss the GOP lawsuit in Georgia (Original Post) Nevilledog Nov 2020 OP
Great excerpt from the motion to dismiss - Native Nov 2020 #1
Get over it, losers. GA is BLUE. Hahahaha! nt crickets Nov 2020 #2
And who would have thought that going in? gratuitous Nov 2020 #3
She really did stand by our state after her stolen election. crickets Nov 2020 #4

Native

(5,936 posts)
1. Great excerpt from the motion to dismiss -
Sat Nov 14, 2020, 01:49 PM
Nov 2020
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs’ Complaint asks this Court to selectively disenfranchise over two million Georgia voters living in several of the state’s most populous counties—counties that did not ultimately support Plaintiffs’ preferred presidential candidate—based on entirely unsupported voter fraudconspiracy theories. Plaintiffs’ implausible allegations are based exclusively on a few isolated, unsubstantiated calls to a voter hotline (the very definition of hearsay), citations to fringe news articles, disproven studies, and projected expert analysis that has not yet actually been prepared (and is itself contingent upon data that the Complaint acknowledges has yet to be finalized or obtained). Plaintiffs ask the Court to take them at their word that this speculation and imaginary expert analysis will, upon “information and belief,” eventually support their extraordinary and highly implausible allegations. None of this is sufficient to invoke this Court’s jurisdiction or stateany recognized or plausible federal cause of action.
This case presents neither a cogent nor cognizable legal theory. To the extent Plaintiffs allege any injury, it is not sufficient to support standing. It is political theatre, pure and simple, part of a broader and deeply troubling effort presently playing out on a national stage, to attempt to use the judiciary to cast doubt on the outcome of the presidential election. Every other court confronted with these efforts has properly rejected them. This Court should do the same and dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint.

crickets

(25,952 posts)
4. She really did stand by our state after her stolen election.
Sat Nov 14, 2020, 02:52 PM
Nov 2020

Instead of fading into the background to perhaps plan another electoral run, Stacey Abrams rolled up her sleeves and got to work on GA's problems with voter suppression and turnout. She has done a fantastic job, and GA will benefit enormously from her efforts.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Marc Elias: We have moved...