Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

soothsayer

(38,601 posts)
Sun Nov 15, 2020, 11:56 PM Nov 2020

lady who won't sign off on the Biden transition lied to congress a while back and needs a pardon fro


?s=21


Allison Gill
@allisongill
A reminder that the lady who won’t sign off on the Biden transition lied to congress a while back and needs a pardon from trump.

GSA chief may have misled Congress about White House involvement in FBI headquarters, according to draft of inspector general report
https://t.co/nl0r9G5Ciq?amp=1
28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
lady who won't sign off on the Biden transition lied to congress a while back and needs a pardon fro (Original Post) soothsayer Nov 2020 OP
parDONald tRump Blue Owl Nov 2020 #1
So. sheshe2 Nov 2020 #2
this is the pattern of a MOB enterprise. Grasswire2 Nov 2020 #12
Actually.. Allison just tweeted it.. It's Emily Cha Nov 2020 #21
Yup: JAILED.. Behind bars. Wifi access denied. etc, etc. fierywoman Nov 2020 #3
Every.single.one.of. them. vapor2 Nov 2020 #4
And the plot thickens. William769 Nov 2020 #5
I feel good remembering Mme Veep Kamala Harris staring into the camera and fierywoman Nov 2020 #6
That was a great moment. William769 Nov 2020 #7
Compromised people are controllable. Qutzupalotl Nov 2020 #8
Why would she need a pardon? There's been no indictment, no charges. scarletwoman Nov 2020 #9
+1 Lucinda Nov 2020 #18
Here Celerity Nov 2020 #26
That fits the profile. Cracklin Charlie Nov 2020 #10
Wonder how long the news has been sitting on this little tidbit? lindysalsagal Nov 2020 #11
Collusion! Lock them all up! lindysalsagal Nov 2020 #13
Seems that I should be more shocked and enraged. dchill Nov 2020 #14
Offer her more money and power than tRump. When she accepts, arrest her. ffr Nov 2020 #15
Trump's pardons will number in thousands AmericanCanuck Nov 2020 #16
"Corrupt intent" -- would that be blackmail? BarbD Nov 2020 #17
It can be any number of things AmericanCanuck Nov 2020 #27
GSA chief *may* have misled Congress progressoid Nov 2020 #19
please.... what is the next paragraph??? n/t orleans Nov 2020 #22
Murphy responded by saying: progressoid Nov 2020 #24
'Murphy responded by saying: elleng Nov 2020 #25
JHC!! Rt.. TY! Cha Nov 2020 #20
That ain't no lady. elleng Nov 2020 #23
Keep kicked lindysalsagal Nov 2020 #28

sheshe2

(83,654 posts)
2. So.
Mon Nov 16, 2020, 12:05 AM
Nov 2020

Let me get this straight.

Allison lied to congress to protect trump. Needs a pardon that trump is holding over her head for her to deny a transition, one that is required by our laws. This denial is a constitutional crisis and a national security crisis. Oh my fucking gawd. The President on down needs to be jailed.

Grasswire2

(13,565 posts)
12. this is the pattern of a MOB enterprise.
Mon Nov 16, 2020, 12:35 AM
Nov 2020

Hire flawed and crooked people and they will do your bidding, no questions asked.

Cha

(296,846 posts)
21. Actually.. Allison just tweeted it.. It's Emily
Mon Nov 16, 2020, 01:51 AM
Nov 2020
Murphy who "lied to Congress".

GSA head Emily Murphy's name should ring a bell.

https://upload.democraticunderground.com/100214520149



fierywoman

(7,671 posts)
6. I feel good remembering Mme Veep Kamala Harris staring into the camera and
Mon Nov 16, 2020, 12:16 AM
Nov 2020

calmly, in a measured way, saying, "I know a predator when I see one."

Qutzupalotl

(14,286 posts)
8. Compromised people are controllable.
Mon Nov 16, 2020, 12:18 AM
Nov 2020

That’s why Trump hires the absolute worst: so he can manipulate them.

scarletwoman

(31,893 posts)
9. Why would she need a pardon? There's been no indictment, no charges.
Mon Nov 16, 2020, 12:24 AM
Nov 2020

The WaPo article is from 2018 and is about a pending IG report - we don't even know how the IG report turned out.

Celerity

(43,103 posts)
26. Here
Mon Nov 16, 2020, 04:12 AM
Nov 2020
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emily_W._Murphy

The FBI had long-scheduled a move out of its D.C. headquarters, the J. Edgar Hoover Building, as the aging building was falling apart and not secure.[2] The bureau's headquarters were planned to move to a suburban location.[2] Although the project had been in the works for more than a decade, Trump personally intervened in 2017 (during the first year of Trump's term and Murphy's tenure) to kill the plan.[2] Democrats said that Trump canceled the move to prevent the Hoover Building site from being redeveloped into a hotel that could compete with Trump's hotel across the street; the Trump White House denied that Trump's business played into the decision.[2][14] House Democrats investigated the episode.[14] In April 2018, Murphy told a congressional oversight hearing that the decision to stop the FBI from moving its headquarters came solely from the bureau without the involvement of Trump.[14]

However, three months later, the GSA inspector general (IG) released a report finding that Murphy's statement to Congress was "incomplete and may have left the misleading impression that she had no discussions with White House officials in the decision-making."[14][15] The report revealed that Murphy and other GSA officials had multiple meetings with Trump about the FBI headquarters, specifically a two-day meeting in January 2018 between Murphy, Trump, White House Chief of Staff John F. Kelly, and budget director Mick Mulvaney.[16] The IG report also found that GSA officials misrepresented the costs of an alternative plan to build a new FBI headquarters in downtown D.C., portraying the replacement plan as cheaper than the original plan when it would actually be more expensive.[16] In October 2018, internal GSA emails disclosed by House Democrats showing that GSA discussed "the President's instructions", "direction from WH" and "what was decided in the meeting with POTUS" in January 2018.[14]

ffr

(22,665 posts)
15. Offer her more money and power than tRump. When she accepts, arrest her.
Mon Nov 16, 2020, 01:20 AM
Nov 2020

Kill two birds with one stone.

 

AmericanCanuck

(1,102 posts)
16. Trump's pardons will number in thousands
Mon Nov 16, 2020, 01:24 AM
Nov 2020

and most of them will be useless if challenged by prosecutors as being bestowed with a "corrupt intent."

 

AmericanCanuck

(1,102 posts)
27. It can be any number of things
Mon Nov 16, 2020, 08:22 AM
Nov 2020

The main corrupt intent would be when Trump pardons someone to keep them from incriminating Trump.

progressoid

(49,945 posts)
19. GSA chief *may* have misled Congress
Mon Nov 16, 2020, 01:42 AM
Nov 2020
The administrator of the General Services Administration, which manages the FBI headquarters project, may have misled Congress about White House involvement in the project, according to a portion of a soon-to-be published report from the agency’s inspector general that was obtained by The Washington Post.

Last year the GSA and the FBI scrapped a long-delayed plan to build an FBI headquarters campus in the Washington suburbs in favor of a proposal to build a smaller headquarters in downtown D.C. and relocate some staff to Alabama, Idaho and West Virginia.

President Trump has said he supported the new plan. Although GSA Administrator Emily Murphy, speaking to the House Appropriations Committee in April, mentioned discussions of funding with the White House’s Office of Management and Budget, she downplayed the role of the White House in the decision-making process.

The conclusions section of the inspector general’s report, which is expected to be released publicly in the coming weeks, states Murphy’s testimony “was incomplete and may have left the misleading impression that she had no discussions with the President or senior White House officials about the project.”

While discussing the project at the hearing, Rep. Mike Quigley (D-Ill.) asked Murphy: “To your knowledge, was the president or anyone else at the White House involved in those discussions, either with your predecessors, people you’re working with now, or yourself?”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2018/08/07/gsa-chief-may-have-misled-congress-about-white-house-involvement-fbi-headquarters-inspector-general-finds/

progressoid

(49,945 posts)
24. Murphy responded by saying:
Mon Nov 16, 2020, 02:35 AM
Nov 2020

“The direction that we got came from the FBI. It was the FBI that directed to GSA as to what its requirements would be. We obviously did coordinate, given that it is a substantial budget request, we coordinated that request with OMB to provide for funding but the requirements were generated by the FBI.”

The inspector general’s report is not final and portions of it could be removed or edited based on the agency’s response. The GSA issued a statement saying it was premature to comment publicly on a draft report. Murphy, through the agency’s spokeswoman, stood by her comments to Congress. “Administrator Murphy’s testimony before the House Committee on Appropriations was accurate and truthful,” said press secretary Pamela A. Dixon, in a statement.

elleng

(130,732 posts)
25. 'Murphy responded by saying:
Mon Nov 16, 2020, 02:42 AM
Nov 2020

“The direction that we got came from the FBI. It was the FBI that directed to GSA as to what its requirements would be. We obviously did coordinate, given that it is a substantial budget request, we coordinated that request with OMB to provide for funding but the requirements were generated by the FBI.”

The inspector general’s report is not final and portions of it could be removed or edited based on the agency’s response.'>>>

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»lady who won't sign off o...