Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDetroit Asks Court to Issue Sanction
Slap 'em back!
Detroit Asks Court to Issue Sanction After Trump Campaign Lawyer Used Court Filing to Spread Disinformation
The City of Detroit sharply criticized the increasingly flailing Trump campaigns legal team for an erroneous, incorrect and inaccurate filing previously submitted in federal court.
Detroit is a defendant in the Trump campaigns apparently abandoned legal efforts to block the certification of the 2020 presidential election results in Wayne County specifically and Michigan generally. And now, the Motor City wants the campaign sanctioned as a result of that error because, they claim, Trumps attorneys knew it was false and were attempting to use the court filing in order to spread, well, fake news.
In a motion filed late Thursday with the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan, attorneys for Detroit lambasted a Thursday morning filing by attorney Mark F. Thor Hearne II which falsely stated that the Wayne County Board of Canvassers declined to certify the results of the presidential election.
As Law&Crime previously reported, that wasnt true at all and legal experts were summarily astonished at the claim made in the motion.
< snip >
The City of Detroit sharply criticized the increasingly flailing Trump campaigns legal team for an erroneous, incorrect and inaccurate filing previously submitted in federal court.
Detroit is a defendant in the Trump campaigns apparently abandoned legal efforts to block the certification of the 2020 presidential election results in Wayne County specifically and Michigan generally. And now, the Motor City wants the campaign sanctioned as a result of that error because, they claim, Trumps attorneys knew it was false and were attempting to use the court filing in order to spread, well, fake news.
In a motion filed late Thursday with the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan, attorneys for Detroit lambasted a Thursday morning filing by attorney Mark F. Thor Hearne II which falsely stated that the Wayne County Board of Canvassers declined to certify the results of the presidential election.
As Law&Crime previously reported, that wasnt true at all and legal experts were summarily astonished at the claim made in the motion.
< snip >
From: https://lawandcrime.com/2020-election/detroit-seeks-sanctions-blasts-trump-campaign-for-using-court-filing-to-spread-disinformation/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
14 replies, 5555 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (90)
ReplyReply to this post
14 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Detroit Asks Court to Issue Sanction (Original Post)
Yonnie3
Nov 2020
OP
The punishment requested in this instance is money, money, money. Seems like a start.
Shrike47
Nov 2020
#12
stillcool
(32,626 posts)1. Good for them!
Sometimes I really wish I had a lot of money.
Yonnie3
(17,427 posts)3. My answer to if I won the lottery what would I do is always ...
I'd do all the things they say Soros is doing and then some (if it is legal).
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,656 posts)2. Finally, a Rule 11 motion!
I was wondering when that would happen, but figured it was bound to eventually.
Yonnie3
(17,427 posts)6. It seems to me that there are more valid instances for such motions,
as to the probability of sanctions I dunno. From dimly remembered classes I think they are rather rare.
TomSlick
(11,096 posts)11. Agreed.
Nevilledog
(51,055 posts)4. Ummm....Trump's attorney is Thor?
Marcuse
(7,463 posts)8. Loki was in Philadelphia.
George II
(67,782 posts)5. What is it donnie dickhead said about "so much winning"?
Ohioboy
(3,240 posts)7. Good! There needs to be consequences for this misinformation they are spreading
MFM008
(19,803 posts)9. I said in an earlier post
that someone somewhere needed to start mounting a vigorous defense against this shit.................
AmericanCanuck
(1,102 posts)10. Make all of Trump's lawyers lose their law licenses for good
Shrike47
(6,913 posts)12. The punishment requested in this instance is money, money, money. Seems like a start.
AmericanCanuck
(1,102 posts)14. Law license money .... there you go!
pat_k
(9,313 posts)13. Every defendent in these cases should be. . .
. . .at least seeking to hold the plaintiffs liable for costs in these nonsense cases.
28 U.S. Code § 1927.Counsels liability for excessive costs
Any attorney or other person admitted to conduct cases in any court of the United States or any Territory thereof who so multiplies the proceedings in any case unreasonably and vexatiously may be required by the court to satisfy personally the excess costs, expenses, and attorneys fees reasonably incurred because of such conduct.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 957; Pub. L. 96349, § 3, Sept. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 1156.)
Any attorney or other person admitted to conduct cases in any court of the United States or any Territory thereof who so multiplies the proceedings in any case unreasonably and vexatiously may be required by the court to satisfy personally the excess costs, expenses, and attorneys fees reasonably incurred because of such conduct.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 957; Pub. L. 96349, § 3, Sept. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 1156.)
I don't know if you could find a better example of multiplying the proceedings unreasonably and vexatiously.