Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

turbinetree

(24,688 posts)
Fri Nov 20, 2020, 07:00 PM Nov 2020

rump judges: 'Therapy' to make kids stop being gay is 'free speech' so it's OK



By Casey Quinlan -November 20, 2020 3:30 PM

Two judges for the 11th Circuit struck down laws that prohibit the harmful practice of 'conversion therapy.'

A pair of judges appointed by Donald Trump ruled Friday that bans in two Florida counties on anti-LGBTQ "conversion therapy" were unconstitutional.

"Conversion therapy" is a dangerous practice that claims gay, bisexual, and lesbian people's sexual orientation and trans people's gender can be changed through the use of methods that groups of psychiatric professionals consider harmful to LGBTQ people's mental health.

Twenty states in the United States have bans on the so-called therapy for minors.

The judges, Barbara Lagoa and Britt Grant, both U.S. Circuit judges for the Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, were both appointed by Trump and were among a three-judge panel charged with determining whether bans on the "therapy" in Boca Raton and Palm Beach should be allowed to stand. The third judge on the panel, Judge Beverly C. Martin, was appointed by President Barack Obama and dissented in the case.

Lagoa and Grant claimed Friday that the bans violated the First Amendment.

Published with permission of The American Independent Foundation.

https://americanindependent.com/donald-trump-appointed-judges-bans-on-dangerous-anti-lgbtq-therapy-unconstitutional/


16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

turbinetree

(24,688 posts)
2. What is truly remarkable is that this "stuff" will go on for years with these types of judges.......
Fri Nov 20, 2020, 07:05 PM
Nov 2020


And the only way to stop this "stuff" is to expand the courts...................

RKP5637

(67,101 posts)
5. I truly hope something will happen. There are way too many crazies in the justice system and
Fri Nov 20, 2020, 07:09 PM
Nov 2020

politics. And often they do little to really protect people, but rather rule in favor of their own hatefulness, bigotry and/or money thrown at them. It's disgusting!!!

Karadeniz

(22,486 posts)
3. So they viewed this as a free speech case? I would've thought it should've been a medical
Fri Nov 20, 2020, 07:05 PM
Nov 2020

Malpractice case.

Volaris

(10,269 posts)
6. Yes but since it's a free speech case, the counter argument gets to be easy:
Fri Nov 20, 2020, 07:09 PM
Nov 2020

Religions get to say whatever lunacy they want. The rest of us are not required to abide it as medically sound.

I'm actually fine with this at this point. Some asshat will put it back in court as medically and scientifically sound, and then they can move to Dover, PA (cause the outcome will be the same)

DBoon

(22,350 posts)
4. so is using leeches to bleed away fevers free speech too?
Fri Nov 20, 2020, 07:06 PM
Nov 2020

So no medical practice can be banned under the guise of free speech?

coti

(4,612 posts)
10. Good frame.
Fri Nov 20, 2020, 07:15 PM
Nov 2020

Also, I think the "free speech" angle is twisted here in that there's no right to forcing people to LISTEN to such bullshit. No one's saying they can't have any opinion they want- that doesn't mean they have the right to subject others continually to it, which is what this "treatment" is.

Solly Mack

(90,761 posts)
8. How are physical, sexual, emotional/mental abuses a 1st amendment issue?
Fri Nov 20, 2020, 07:13 PM
Nov 2020

How is hate translated into action protected?

How is ignorance translated into action protected?

Your bigoted words might be protected but once you put those words into action you cross the line into violating the rights of others.

You can hate me all you want but once you act on that hate against me, then you've violated my rights.



KT2000

(20,571 posts)
15. they gave up forcing left-handed children
Fri Nov 20, 2020, 08:04 PM
Nov 2020

into doing everything with their right hand. It was considered cruel, not free speech.

DBoon

(22,350 posts)
16. cruelty is the only speech that republicans know
Fri Nov 20, 2020, 08:56 PM
Nov 2020

if they were not allowed to humiliate and inflict pain on others they would be silent

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»rump judges: 'Therapy' to...