Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWalt Shaub: The Presidential Transition Meets Murphy's Law
https://www.nybooks.com/daily/2020/11/13/the-presidential-transition-meets-murphys-law/One senior official is charged with ensuring a peaceful transfer of power when there is an apparent election winner. The Trump appointee is jeopardizing all that.
Trumps absurd insistence that he WON THIS ELECTION, BY A LOT! is easy enough to ignore. What is harder to ignore is what his appointee who runs the General Services Administration (GSA) is doing. By statute, the GSAs administrator has responsibility for ascertaining the apparent successful candidates for the office of President and Vice President. This crucial ascertainment sets the governments support for the transition effort in motion. When Congress enacted the transition law and later amended it seven times, it does not appear to have contemplated the risk that a partisan loyalist appointed by a corrupt president would refuse to fulfill this duty when the outcome of the election was clear. Enter GSA Administrator Emily Murphy.
Murphy is refusing to ascertain the apparent winner of the 2020 election as the president who appointed her disputes the clear outcome. She has not been especially transparent about her rationale. A spokesperson for her agency unhelpfully said, an ascertainment has not yet been made and [the] Administrator will continue to abide by, and fulfill, all requirements under the law. Murphy, it seems, is putting her loyalty to Trump over her duty to the American people.
Much is at stake. The Congressional Research Service has written that [t]he smooth and orderly transfer of power generally is a notable feature of presidential transitions, and a testament to the legitimacy and durability of the electoral and democratic processes. Murphys misconduct is dangerous.
Her ascertainment is the legally necessary precursor to the governments assistance to the Biden-Harris Presidential Transition Team. It releases $6.3 million dollars to the team, which is funded by public and private money; a loan of expanded federal office space and equipment; access to government agencies that will begin sharing information and records about ongoing activities, plans and vulnerabilities; national security briefings for the president; and other support. The New York Times reports that transition officials said her inaction was preventing Mr. Bidens teams from moving into government offices, including secure facilities where they can discuss classified information. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence recently confirmed that it is not providing national security briefings to the president-elect. The Defense Department has also reportedly indicated that it will not meet with the Biden-Harris transition team until Murphy formally affirms the apparent winner.
Murphys refusal comes as great news to hostile foreign powers. Experts have cautioned that authoritarian governments see a benefit in having public confidence in democracy undermined. But one of Trumps own former national security experts, Fiona Hill, has warned: The biggest risk to this election is not the Russians, its us. Four former Secretaries of Homeland Security, Republican and Democratic (Tom Ridge, Michael Chertoff, Janet Napolitano, and Jeh Johnson), have now called on Murphy to issue the ascertainment of an apparent winner of the election, counseling: At this period of heightened risk for our nation, we do not have a single day to spare to begin the transition. For the good of the nation, we must start now.
Trumps absurd insistence that he WON THIS ELECTION, BY A LOT! is easy enough to ignore. What is harder to ignore is what his appointee who runs the General Services Administration (GSA) is doing. By statute, the GSAs administrator has responsibility for ascertaining the apparent successful candidates for the office of President and Vice President. This crucial ascertainment sets the governments support for the transition effort in motion. When Congress enacted the transition law and later amended it seven times, it does not appear to have contemplated the risk that a partisan loyalist appointed by a corrupt president would refuse to fulfill this duty when the outcome of the election was clear. Enter GSA Administrator Emily Murphy.
Murphy is refusing to ascertain the apparent winner of the 2020 election as the president who appointed her disputes the clear outcome. She has not been especially transparent about her rationale. A spokesperson for her agency unhelpfully said, an ascertainment has not yet been made and [the] Administrator will continue to abide by, and fulfill, all requirements under the law. Murphy, it seems, is putting her loyalty to Trump over her duty to the American people.
Much is at stake. The Congressional Research Service has written that [t]he smooth and orderly transfer of power generally is a notable feature of presidential transitions, and a testament to the legitimacy and durability of the electoral and democratic processes. Murphys misconduct is dangerous.
Her ascertainment is the legally necessary precursor to the governments assistance to the Biden-Harris Presidential Transition Team. It releases $6.3 million dollars to the team, which is funded by public and private money; a loan of expanded federal office space and equipment; access to government agencies that will begin sharing information and records about ongoing activities, plans and vulnerabilities; national security briefings for the president; and other support. The New York Times reports that transition officials said her inaction was preventing Mr. Bidens teams from moving into government offices, including secure facilities where they can discuss classified information. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence recently confirmed that it is not providing national security briefings to the president-elect. The Defense Department has also reportedly indicated that it will not meet with the Biden-Harris transition team until Murphy formally affirms the apparent winner.
Murphys refusal comes as great news to hostile foreign powers. Experts have cautioned that authoritarian governments see a benefit in having public confidence in democracy undermined. But one of Trumps own former national security experts, Fiona Hill, has warned: The biggest risk to this election is not the Russians, its us. Four former Secretaries of Homeland Security, Republican and Democratic (Tom Ridge, Michael Chertoff, Janet Napolitano, and Jeh Johnson), have now called on Murphy to issue the ascertainment of an apparent winner of the election, counseling: At this period of heightened risk for our nation, we do not have a single day to spare to begin the transition. For the good of the nation, we must start now.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 741 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (14)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Walt Shaub: The Presidential Transition Meets Murphy's Law (Original Post)
CousinIT
Nov 2020
OP