Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"Breaking the law is not a political difference."
This very long New York Times article can inform our discussions about post-pardon trumpism. (small t trumpism) It's important and worth the read.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/17/magazine/trump-investigations-criminal-prosecutions.html
In September, two former executive-branch lawyers, Bob Bauer (who served under Obama) and Jack Goldsmith (who served under George W. Bush) published an entire book, After Trump, addressing the subject of how to reform the presidency. They identified the many open doors that Trump had charged through and offered some 50 suggestions on how to close them, whether that meant rewriting existing laws or passing new ones. Among other things, they proposed requiring campaigns to report any contact with foreign governments and clarifying the obstruction statute to eliminate ambiguity about when the president has violated it. The one subject on which Bauer and Goldsmith couldnt agree was what to do with Trump; they divided that chapter in half, with Bauer advocating for a full investigation and Goldsmith urging caution.
Even as I write this, Trumps subversion of democratic norms continues. He still has not conceded, and Barr has overruled the head of the Justice Departments Election Crimes department to approve investigations into vote tabulation irregularities. These legal maneuvers may be less about Trump trying to overturn the results of the election than they are about him trying to gain leverage to limit his liability when he leaves office. Even though Biden pledged during the campaign not to pardon him, Trump could still try to trade his concession for the promise of leniency. He could also try to pardon himself, though this has never been done before and may not hold up in court. (Another, probably more far-fetched scenario has Trump resigning so President Pence can pardon him.)
The nation may desire healing. But there is also the matter of justice, and there is no guarantee that what feels right now will look right through the longer lens of history. Ford was widely assailed for pardoning Nixon. But one of his most outspoken critics at the time, Senator Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts, later honored Ford with a Profile in Courage award, explaining that hed been moved to rethink his views after witnessing the sprawling and protracted investigation into President Clinton by the independent counsel Ken Starr. It may be time to rethink Fords decision once more; its hard not to wonder if a Trump presidency would have been possible if Nixon had been criminally prosecuted rather than pardoned.
In that sense, the problem that Trump poses for Biden may also present an opportunity, a chance to repair more than just the damage of the last four years. To begin with, this may require recognizing that when a president brazenly flouts the law, electoral defeat might not be enough of a punishment. Theres a mind-set that we need to reset, Stephen Vladeck, a constitutional law professor at the University of Texas, told me. Breaking the law is not a political difference. It might also require recognizing that to really move on from Trump, healing may have to mean something fundamentally different from what it has in the past and that without accountability, it may in fact be impossible.
Even as I write this, Trumps subversion of democratic norms continues. He still has not conceded, and Barr has overruled the head of the Justice Departments Election Crimes department to approve investigations into vote tabulation irregularities. These legal maneuvers may be less about Trump trying to overturn the results of the election than they are about him trying to gain leverage to limit his liability when he leaves office. Even though Biden pledged during the campaign not to pardon him, Trump could still try to trade his concession for the promise of leniency. He could also try to pardon himself, though this has never been done before and may not hold up in court. (Another, probably more far-fetched scenario has Trump resigning so President Pence can pardon him.)
The nation may desire healing. But there is also the matter of justice, and there is no guarantee that what feels right now will look right through the longer lens of history. Ford was widely assailed for pardoning Nixon. But one of his most outspoken critics at the time, Senator Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts, later honored Ford with a Profile in Courage award, explaining that hed been moved to rethink his views after witnessing the sprawling and protracted investigation into President Clinton by the independent counsel Ken Starr. It may be time to rethink Fords decision once more; its hard not to wonder if a Trump presidency would have been possible if Nixon had been criminally prosecuted rather than pardoned.
In that sense, the problem that Trump poses for Biden may also present an opportunity, a chance to repair more than just the damage of the last four years. To begin with, this may require recognizing that when a president brazenly flouts the law, electoral defeat might not be enough of a punishment. Theres a mind-set that we need to reset, Stephen Vladeck, a constitutional law professor at the University of Texas, told me. Breaking the law is not a political difference. It might also require recognizing that to really move on from Trump, healing may have to mean something fundamentally different from what it has in the past and that without accountability, it may in fact be impossible.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 858 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (15)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Breaking the law is not a political difference." (Original Post)
ancianita
Nov 2020
OP
Timewas
(2,190 posts)1. The last sentence
Is where it is at...If he walks away with no repercussions real healing is not possible.
ancianita
(35,932 posts)2. Agree. And the OP title is the crucial reason.
No exceptions made at federal levels. Trumpism wants to exempt itself at federal levels.
crickets
(25,952 posts)3. Absolutely agreed.
But one of his most outspoken critics at the time, Senator Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts, later honored Ford with a Profile in Courage award, explaining that hed been moved to rethink his views after witnessing the sprawling and protracted investigation into President Clinton by the independent counsel Ken Starr.
It's also important to differentiate between necessary investigation and a partisan witch hunt. trump's transgressions are so blatant and egregious, there are no grounds for mistaking any prosecution against him as being fueled by party concerns over those of national security as well as equal justice under law.