Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(111,052 posts)
Tue Nov 24, 2020, 09:51 PM Nov 2020

We probably could have avoided the last 4 years with Donald Trump if...

...we had only required candidates for President to make their tax returns public?


That one small oversight could have saved a lot of heartaches and stress.

In my opinion, that should be a requirement for future candidates. Not a nicety, but a legal requirement. If you don't want to show the public your returns, then perhaps you should not run for the Presidency?

40 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
We probably could have avoided the last 4 years with Donald Trump if... (Original Post) kentuck Nov 2020 OP
I'm not sure it would survive a challenge. Would probably require an amendment to work. bullimiami Nov 2020 #1
If we get the Senate in the Georgia run-offs, it can be new legislation without being an amendment. brush Nov 2020 #4
Yes but consider. Presidential eligibility requirements are spelled out in the Constitution. bullimiami Nov 2020 #8
Or course there we no tax turns then. I say pass legislation if we have the majority... brush Nov 2020 #10
The law of course would mean an immediate court challenge as you said. totodeinhere Nov 2020 #11
Probably so, but it would have to go to a circuit court first, right and who knows what... brush Nov 2020 #12
Amendments are just that. Amendments it can be done. Why would anyone be against it? Boogiemack Nov 2020 #15
I thought you were gonna say 'if Jill Stein's father had loved her more' ... but turns out it was mr_lebowski Nov 2020 #2
Oh but remember, poor little Donny isn't allowed to share his tax returns... Blue Owl Nov 2020 #3
Hugo Chavez isn't finished going over them yet. calimary Nov 2020 #21
Even more so, require they pass a basic security clearance... Wounded Bear Nov 2020 #5
That too. Delmette2.0 Nov 2020 #40
His cult wouldn't have cared lilmamba Nov 2020 #6
Making his returns public might not have turned off his cult but... Gidney N Cloyd Nov 2020 #19
Do you really think any of them believed he had the wealth he claimed? relayerbob Nov 2020 #31
This message was self-deleted by its author Gidney N Cloyd Nov 2020 #37
I'm sure Deutsche Bank and the Russians knew. But wasn't propping up his image to the world part of Gidney N Cloyd Nov 2020 #38
If we had voted in 2016. But now that it's about over, maybe it's a good lesson. Hoyt Nov 2020 #7
Maybe they should be able to pass a standard background check? Just an idea. n/t Whiskeytide Nov 2020 #9
All candidates should be able to pass a security check LeeAndrews Nov 2020 #13
Welcome to DU, LeeAndrews! calimary Nov 2020 #25
Welcome to our DU family. niyad Nov 2020 #33
+1 MustLoveBeagles Nov 2020 #35
I'm afraid it would be unconstitutional. The Constitution lays out the requirements. GulfCoast66 Nov 2020 #14
... we had an educated electorate. Not the BS system we have now. n/t Pobeka Nov 2020 #16
Congress can request anybody's tax returns NotASurfer Nov 2020 #17
Candidates also need to get the highest security clearance. nature-lover Nov 2020 #18
I'd also add that if someone is running for president Bettie Nov 2020 #20
Yeah, and you should demonstrate some actual evidence of public service bucolic_frolic Nov 2020 #22
I think it's a great idea. BobTheSubgenius Nov 2020 #23
Agree Joinfortmill Nov 2020 #24
A really simple step and so Necessary since the "i'm not a crook guy" and for Crooked Donald RANDYWILDMAN Nov 2020 #26
We could have avoided Donald Trump AmericanCanuck Nov 2020 #27
You assume that the people who voted for him cared relayerbob Nov 2020 #28
2 part answer stopdiggin Nov 2020 #29
and his enabler, Mitch McConnell Demonaut Nov 2020 #30
I think the best way to prevent the next Trump is reinstate the fairness doctrine Bucky Nov 2020 #32
Ever since the Eagleton fiasco, I have thought that every candidate for our highest offices niyad Nov 2020 #34
I don't think his followers care. GeorgeGist Nov 2020 #36
I don't believe that is constitutional. The requirements are laid out in the Constitution. Demsrule86 Nov 2020 #39

brush

(53,743 posts)
4. If we get the Senate in the Georgia run-offs, it can be new legislation without being an amendment.
Tue Nov 24, 2020, 09:56 PM
Nov 2020

bullimiami

(13,076 posts)
8. Yes but consider. Presidential eligibility requirements are spelled out in the Constitution.
Tue Nov 24, 2020, 10:17 PM
Nov 2020

They don’t include tax returns.

I don’t think it would survive any scotus if challenged by a candidate.

brush

(53,743 posts)
10. Or course there we no tax turns then. I say pass legislation if we have the majority...
Tue Nov 24, 2020, 10:20 PM
Nov 2020

and let the republicans try to get it to SCOTUS if the can.

totodeinhere

(13,057 posts)
11. The law of course would mean an immediate court challenge as you said.
Tue Nov 24, 2020, 10:24 PM
Nov 2020

How that would turn out with Trump's judges we do not know yet.

brush

(53,743 posts)
12. Probably so, but it would have to go to a circuit court first, right and who knows what...
Tue Nov 24, 2020, 10:39 PM
Nov 2020

would happen.

 

Boogiemack

(1,406 posts)
15. Amendments are just that. Amendments it can be done. Why would anyone be against it?
Tue Nov 24, 2020, 10:51 PM
Nov 2020

Not having that as a requirement is what has opened the door to so much corruption and aided Citizens United to fester and ruin our democracy.

To me, CORRUPTION, domestic and international. Corruption of despotic leaders like Trump is what has the world teetering on the brink of total moral and physical destruction. We, America, should take the lead by example of rooting out the corruption that we can expose and require of leaders who are responsible for the lives and well-being of their countrymen and women. There should be an international law of decency maybe unwritten and unspoken, but universally agreed upon. We should refuse to do business with autocrats who set out to fulfill their own greed lusts for wealth and power instead of ruling by concern for the safety and health of their own people. Leaders can be wealthy without having to starve, kill, and maime their own people and deny them a means to reap a livelihood for themselves and their families. And they should be held accountable for their actions that threaten our mutual environment and natural resources like air and water.

CORRUPTION should become one of the important bywords of American leadership from now on. This notion of weeding out corruption should be on the table of nations and the UN. It ties into food insecurity, illness, poverty, war, and environment assault. Making that plain to the people of the nations ought to encourage them to overthrow greedy and discriminatory despots.

It's a dream...but "you gotta have a dream or how you gonna have a dream come true?"

 

mr_lebowski

(33,643 posts)
2. I thought you were gonna say 'if Jill Stein's father had loved her more' ... but turns out it was
Tue Nov 24, 2020, 09:54 PM
Nov 2020

even better ... offering tangible solutions and all that.

Blue Owl

(50,272 posts)
3. Oh but remember, poor little Donny isn't allowed to share his tax returns...
Tue Nov 24, 2020, 09:54 PM
Nov 2020

until his never-ending, 100-year audit is over with...

Wounded Bear

(58,604 posts)
5. Even more so, require they pass a basic security clearance...
Tue Nov 24, 2020, 09:56 PM
Nov 2020

which includes deep dives into the candidates financial situation.

Delmette2.0

(4,157 posts)
40. That too.
Wed Nov 25, 2020, 03:35 PM
Nov 2020

Tax returns and security checks.

We expect that much for cabinet members.

The days of honorable people (just take them at their word) running for President are over.

lilmamba

(62 posts)
6. His cult wouldn't have cared
Tue Nov 24, 2020, 09:56 PM
Nov 2020

Remember when Trump said “I could shoot somebody on Fifth Avenue and I’d still get votes”, or something to that effect? If the tax returns were public he probably still would’ve convinced his cult like following that he was a smart dude for only paying $750 a year.

Turn out was the bigger issue in my opinion. It’s a cult we’re dealing with here, he could convince them of anything.

Gidney N Cloyd

(19,824 posts)
19. Making his returns public might not have turned off his cult but...
Tue Nov 24, 2020, 11:30 PM
Nov 2020

...Trump really didn't want to let his wealthy peer group know he didn't have the wealth he claimed nor did he want to tip off lenders to the real value of his assets.

relayerbob

(6,537 posts)
31. Do you really think any of them believed he had the wealth he claimed?
Wed Nov 25, 2020, 12:03 AM
Nov 2020

Deutsche Bank knew he didn't have the collateral, that's why the Russians were involved. They knew he broke and desperate too, and they got what they paid for.

Response to relayerbob (Reply #31)

Gidney N Cloyd

(19,824 posts)
38. I'm sure Deutsche Bank and the Russians knew. But wasn't propping up his image to the world part of
Wed Nov 25, 2020, 09:24 AM
Nov 2020

...part of what they were offering him? Not just keeping the money flowing but keeping the brand going?

LeeAndrews

(7 posts)
13. All candidates should be able to pass a security check
Tue Nov 24, 2020, 10:42 PM
Nov 2020

Trump shouldn't have obviously even been eligible to run.

calimary

(81,125 posts)
25. Welcome to DU, LeeAndrews!
Tue Nov 24, 2020, 11:54 PM
Nov 2020

There were SOOOOO many reasons that rendered the donald ineligible for the Oval Office. Never told the truth. Never coughed up his tax returns. Had NO government experience. Had five or is bankruptcies that proved he's a total loser when it comes to managing money. Left a trail of bad decisions and unhappy, unpaid contractors and subcontractors in his wake. And on... and on... and on...

GulfCoast66

(11,949 posts)
14. I'm afraid it would be unconstitutional. The Constitution lays out the requirements.
Tue Nov 24, 2020, 10:47 PM
Nov 2020

Congress can’t add too or reduce them.

NotASurfer

(2,146 posts)
17. Congress can request anybody's tax returns
Tue Nov 24, 2020, 11:18 PM
Nov 2020

This came up in connection with congressional inquiries. Donnie two-scoops used the full power of the government to run out the clock on those demands, so the tax returns will not be forthcoming until after he's absconded with the WH silverware.

Congress could request and receive tax returns for any candidate, valid national security concerns, maybe we need some teeth in the law so that if the IRS does not comply, there are consequences. I think your suggestion is entirely reasonable and can be implemented as a natural exercise of congressional oversight.

Bettie

(16,076 posts)
20. I'd also add that if someone is running for president
Tue Nov 24, 2020, 11:31 PM
Nov 2020

they should be able to acquire a security clearance legitimately, not "he has to have one because he was elected".

bucolic_frolic

(43,062 posts)
22. Yeah, and you should demonstrate some actual evidence of public service
Tue Nov 24, 2020, 11:36 PM
Nov 2020

but you know the 1% got everything they wanted and then some, and they would have pushed HRC for all she was worth and gotten much of it anyway by making her political life miserable.

And I'm uncertain as to what can be said to be the benefit of dismantling everything the US stood from from 1918 to 2016. I mean they got tax cuts and pollution deregulation and federal lands like the Teapot Dome scandal.

Still seems like some invisible foreign enemies of democracy, perhaps those we defeated in wars, were backing Trump. Boy it would be great to see those tax returns.

BobTheSubgenius

(11,560 posts)
23. I think it's a great idea.
Tue Nov 24, 2020, 11:37 PM
Nov 2020

But doesn't have much chance of becoming law, unfortunately.

Thing of it is, though....it's the same for all candidates. How is that unfair or unreasonable?

RANDYWILDMAN

(2,664 posts)
26. A really simple step and so Necessary since the "i'm not a crook guy" and for Crooked Donald
Tue Nov 24, 2020, 11:55 PM
Nov 2020

Cause he is just a freaking Mobster who only owes money to Gangsters and pays $750 dollars in taxes.


Hilary f-ing knew the whole time that he was 1oo% fraud and said it in too nice of a way for his cultists to understand!

Shizz he went from 62 million to 75 million fans in 4 years and all he did was lie and feed them bullshit. Hate must spread like covid !

 

AmericanCanuck

(1,102 posts)
27. We could have avoided Donald Trump
Tue Nov 24, 2020, 11:57 PM
Nov 2020

if people like David Sirota, Nina Turner and Brihana Joy-Grey (and thousands of others like them) had supported Hillary Clinton instead of the Moscow Jill Stein.

What were they thinking?

relayerbob

(6,537 posts)
28. You assume that the people who voted for him cared
Wed Nov 25, 2020, 12:00 AM
Nov 2020

They don't. He appealed to their racism, hatred and fear. Especially of the "gubmint". Any tax return problems would have beend ecried as fake and promptly lied about or ignored. What would have avoided the last four years would have been to actually prosecute him for his illegal financial dealings over the last several decades.

I do agree that tax returns be made public, but don't think those would form any sort of filter or liability for those running when their followers are delusional.

stopdiggin

(11,248 posts)
29. 2 part answer
Wed Nov 25, 2020, 12:02 AM
Nov 2020

we should return to that practice (not sure about a legal requirement -- might be tricky. maybe the parties cold be forced to vet, through public opinion, going forward?)

and -- it seems to me that Trump paid very little penalty for withholding that information (I know people I talked to at the time were totally disinterested, if not in favor of his stance) -- and I have serious doubts if the people that voted for him would have been swayed differently by a full accounting.

Bucky

(53,947 posts)
32. I think the best way to prevent the next Trump is reinstate the fairness doctrine
Wed Nov 25, 2020, 12:09 AM
Nov 2020

Any kind of broadcast medium, via airways or cable or satellite or internet, any news organization utilizing public assets to broadcast, need to provide equal time for opposing viewpoints on controversial issues.

That means there will be "truthers" of one form or another getting equal time on Rachel Maddow or Anderson Cooper. But it also means reality checks for Sean Hannity, or OANN or Newsmax viewers. Given the threat to our democracy presented by viewer balkanization, I think it's time to force Americans to share a conversation.

No one needs a safe space from reality.

niyad

(113,076 posts)
34. Ever since the Eagleton fiasco, I have thought that every candidate for our highest offices
Wed Nov 25, 2020, 12:15 AM
Nov 2020

Should have to,pass a basic psych evaluation. I realize all the problems inherent with that concept, though.

Demsrule86

(68,469 posts)
39. I don't believe that is constitutional. The requirements are laid out in the Constitution.
Wed Nov 25, 2020, 11:27 AM
Nov 2020

There is needed reform -no doubt. But with people literally starving in the streets and losing their homes...jobs, that must be our first priority... Congress should not investigate Trump. We will never change people's minds about Trump if they are Trumpers. The popular idea around here is 'if only they knew', then they would stop being Trump fans. But I suggest, they do know and don't care and never will but sending help to Americans.We care deeply about punishing Trump and fixing the system. We are political junkies, but Americans want things to get better. In two year if we have been attempting to bring Trump to justice and not seen as caring about the people. We lose the house and fail to gain senate seats when there really are opportunities. Leave Trump to the states and the AG's office.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We probably could have av...