Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
63 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This by @AOC . (Original Post) melman Nov 2020 OP
Yeah, what she said. myccrider Nov 2020 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author Hermit-The-Prog Nov 2020 #2
Thanks melman Nov 2020 #11
Welcome. Will delete mine, above, so as to avoid too much scrolling in discussion. Hermit-The-Prog Nov 2020 #23
All thoughts I have had for a very long time. Brainfodder Nov 2020 #3
Paying all workers a wage they can live very well on is a start lunatica Nov 2020 #4
Last night Chris Hayes showed farm workers picking several crops malaise Nov 2020 #13
I saw that lunatica Nov 2020 #14
Yes he's come a long way malaise Nov 2020 #16
This might help.... Roisin Ni Fiachra Nov 2020 #8
Democrats aren't bribed by billionaires and are not corrupt. betsuni Nov 2020 #5
What makes them immune theaocp Nov 2020 #6
They're not idiots. betsuni Nov 2020 #7
I think that's a naive approach. theaocp Nov 2020 #10
I totally agree with you. Everyone can be corrupted by money, EVERYONE. George II Nov 2020 #25
Yeah ... look at Justice Democrats and huge sums of dark money they have accumulated AmericanCanuck Nov 2020 #35
Not just the organization, but dig into their FEC filings and those associated with them.... George II Nov 2020 #39
Also isn't Cenk trying to prevent his staff from forming a Union JI7 Nov 2020 #40
Hypocrisy thy name is Cenk AmericanCanuck Nov 2020 #45
Yes, when it comes to him personally and business-wise he's very much against unionization... George II Nov 2020 #57
Something does and it's probably something lunatica Nov 2020 #15
Some who bash billionaires gladly accept billionaire money. George II Nov 2020 #24
Yup. cwydro Nov 2020 #27
Uh...proud Dem here. But we're not immune. cwydro Nov 2020 #26
In general, no comparison -- Democrats have a conscience, Republicans don't. Dems feel guilty and betsuni Nov 2020 #28
Lol, yeah. cwydro Nov 2020 #29
But the Party rejected Edwards and he has no future in the party JI7 Nov 2020 #37
That's all well and good. cwydro Nov 2020 #54
Nobody said no Democrats are corrupt. betsuni Nov 2020 #55
"Democrats are not bribed by billionaires and are not corrupt." cwydro Nov 2020 #63
AOC may have a problem with speaking out un-politically, panader0 Nov 2020 #9
What she wrote is actually a paraphrased version of Karl Marx AmericanCanuck Nov 2020 #38
I SO agree with what she said Tom Rinaldo Nov 2020 #12
She's a troublemaker of the good trouble kind. lunatica Nov 2020 #17
Bring that message to Georgia. Kid Berwyn Nov 2020 #18
Socialism is not likely to sell in Georgia AmericanCanuck Nov 2020 #21
AOC is a socialist? Kid Berwyn Nov 2020 #22
Potaytos Potahtoes AmericanCanuck Nov 2020 #30
I do wish they'd call themselves Social Democrats ... n/t moonscape Nov 2020 #32
Social Justice Warriors Kid Berwyn Nov 2020 #52
So far the warriors are mainly fighting on twitter AmericanCanuck Nov 2020 #56
Maybe if AOC delivered her message directly... Kid Berwyn Nov 2020 #59
The green new deal is not a plan AmericanCanuck Nov 2020 #60
Do you know what socialism means? PTWB Nov 2020 #31
I know what it means and I stand by my statement AmericanCanuck Nov 2020 #33
What does socialism mean to you? PTWB Nov 2020 #34
Non sequitur AmericanCanuck Nov 2020 #36
Shrug. PTWB Nov 2020 #42
I stand by my statement AmericanCanuck Nov 2020 #43
Oh? PTWB Nov 2020 #46
Non sequitur as I stated. AmericanCanuck Nov 2020 #47
How? PTWB Nov 2020 #49
I was going to ask for their definition of non sequitur... Violet_Crumble Nov 2020 #51
You were asked what your definition of socialism was and refused to answer... Violet_Crumble Nov 2020 #50
Exactly. Voters aren't going to waste time being browbeaten, R B Garr Nov 2020 #53
AOC is not to the left of FDR radius777 Nov 2020 #61
We tried "progressive force" before with McGovern, Dukakis and Mondale AmericanCanuck Nov 2020 #62
Do you think a $15 minimum wage falls under the blanket of "socialism"? bullwinkle428 Nov 2020 #41
No it does not AmericanCanuck Nov 2020 #44
Fight for Fifteen began in 2012 and became a national movement. betsuni Nov 2020 #48
This message was self-deleted by its author George II Nov 2020 #58
This message was self-deleted by its author AmericanCanuck Nov 2020 #19
Ah, the old "they don't really have all that money" gag melman Nov 2020 #20

myccrider

(484 posts)
1. Yeah, what she said.
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 01:02 AM
Nov 2020

I had an interesting convo with a relative who is a private banker, meaning she personally services rich folks to keep their money at her employer’s bank. I was making points similar to AOCs about our system’s inequities and my relative said "but these aren’t bad people." My reply was "I’m sure many of them aren’t, just as many of the lords and ladies, kings and nobles of an earlier time were individually good people, by their lights, but the system they were on top of was still terribly unfair to the majority of people."

I could see that her brain, metaphorically, snapped back with surprise and revulsion. She changed the subject pretty quickly and we went on with what we were doing.

Response to melman (Original post)

Brainfodder

(6,423 posts)
3. All thoughts I have had for a very long time.
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 05:12 AM
Nov 2020

How you stop it?

New U.S. currency, and expire out the old, with a max limit on trading it in, will require a new price schedule on things!

NEXT!




lunatica

(53,410 posts)
4. Paying all workers a wage they can live very well on is a start
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 05:19 AM
Nov 2020

That includes workers in factories, in farms, and all service industries.

Then paying taxes so everyone can have free education, healthcare, and guaranteed adequate housing.

These would be a good start and they could still live as they’re accustomed to.

malaise

(268,686 posts)
13. Last night Chris Hayes showed farm workers picking several crops
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 04:43 PM
Nov 2020

and mentioned what they are paid. He asked people to thank them and consider their plight during Thanksgiving.

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
14. I saw that
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 04:55 PM
Nov 2020

Getting paid a dollar a bucket is truly criminal. Kudos to Chris Hayes for showing that.

I’ve noticed that Chris has changed and become an advocate because of Trump. He’s stopped trying to be neutral. He’s much more involved with the plight of the undocumented and Trump’s criminal treatment of them. His face gets rigid with anger when he talks about the children in the cages and their subsequent treatment.

I hope everyone involved, from Trump to Stephen Miller to John Kelly to Kirsten Nielsen and everyone else connected to those children ends up rotting in jail.

Roisin Ni Fiachra

(2,574 posts)
8. This might help....
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 08:27 AM
Nov 2020

Sanders, Colleagues Introduce Tax on Billionaire Wealth Gains to Provide Health Care for All

Thursday, August 6, 2020

WASHINGTON, August 6 – Today, Senators Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Ed Markey (D-Mass.), and Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) introduced a 60-percent tax on the windfall wealth increases of billionaires during this pandemic in order to pay for all out-of-pocket medical expenses for every person in America for a year. Representative Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) introduced companion legislation in the House.

The Make Billionaires Pay Act would tax the $731 billion in wealth accumulated by 467 billionaires—the richest 0.001% of America—a from March 18th until August 5th, a period in which 5.4 million Americans recently lost their health insurance and 50 million applied for unemployment insurance. The funds from this emergency tax would be used to cover all necessary healthcare expenses of the uninsured and underinsured, including prescription drugs, for one year.

"The legislation I am introducing today will tax the obscene wealth gains billionaires have made during this extraordinary crisis to guarantee healthcare as a right to all for an entire year,” said Sanders. "At a time of enormous economic pain and suffering, we have a fundamental choice to make. We can continue to allow the very rich to get much richer while everyone else gets poorer and poorer. Or we can tax the winnings a handful of billionaires made during the pandemic to improve the health and well-being of tens of millions of Americans. In my view, it is time for the Senate to act on behalf of the working class who are hurting like they have never hurt before, not the billionaire class who are doing phenomenally well and have never had it so good."

"As more than 160,000 Americans have lost their lives and millions more have lost their jobs, it is unconscionable that the super-wealthy are getting even richer in the midst of this crisis," said Markey. "Despite overwhelming need, Republicans continue to look for any excuse under the guise of deficit reduction to cut vital support programs like jobless aid and health insurance for the most vulnerable. The American people pay with their lives every day for the criminal negligence of the Trump administration to combat the coronavirus. It is time the country’s wealthiest do the same off with their profits."

https://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/sanders-colleagues-introduce-tax-on-billionaire-wealth-gains-to-provide-health-care-for-all-

theaocp

(4,232 posts)
10. I think that's a naive approach.
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 09:29 AM
Nov 2020

It's not about intelligence or even wisdom. People are people. When the system has an incentive born of money, that becomes the motivating factor. It's corrupting and gross. However, give anyone the right circumstances and the donor class has a lot of leverage they should have taken away from them.

 

AmericanCanuck

(1,102 posts)
35. Yeah ... look at Justice Democrats and huge sums of dark money they have accumulated
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 11:51 PM
Nov 2020

So, not only that EVERYONE can be corrupted by money, EVERYONE is capable of hypocrisy.

George II

(67,782 posts)
39. Not just the organization, but dig into their FEC filings and those associated with them....
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 11:55 PM
Nov 2020

As they say, "Pot. Kettle. Black."

JI7

(89,239 posts)
40. Also isn't Cenk trying to prevent his staff from forming a Union
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 11:56 PM
Nov 2020

I understand that he was actually a Republican for a long time and is a misogynist and so none of this is surprising .

But the point is that people who claim to be certain things are often not.

George II

(67,782 posts)
57. Yes, when it comes to him personally and business-wise he's very much against unionization...
Fri Nov 27, 2020, 08:57 AM
Nov 2020

It's just another example of do as I say, not as I do.

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
15. Something does and it's probably something
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 04:58 PM
Nov 2020

in the physical brain. Science will find out someday soon. Studies are already making inroads.

 

cwydro

(51,308 posts)
26. Uh...proud Dem here. But we're not immune.
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 07:07 PM
Nov 2020

See John Edwards/Bunny Mellon.

Not bribery in that case, but she supported a corrupt and awful man.

betsuni

(25,374 posts)
28. In general, no comparison -- Democrats have a conscience, Republicans don't. Dems feel guilty and
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 08:28 PM
Nov 2020

will likely get caught and their careers over.

People have different weaknesses. For some it's money, for others it's sex or something else. Some people are born with money but what they want more than anything is the thing they weren't born with: talent, physical attributes. I've known people like that. Wanted to be models or dancers, wrong body type. Artists, no talent.

I was just thinking about how propaganda created for left-leaning audiences in 2016 calling Hillary Clinton a "corporate *****" who only cared about money, only in politics for money. It was so stupid. Also, demonizing billionaires is pointless to me.

The idea that anybody can be bought is preposterous, guess that really is just me.

JI7

(89,239 posts)
37. But the Party rejected Edwards and he has no future in the party
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 11:53 PM
Nov 2020

That's the difference. I'm sure there will be democrats who do bad things but they are not going to get support .

 

cwydro

(51,308 posts)
54. That's all well and good.
Fri Nov 27, 2020, 08:24 AM
Nov 2020

I only objected to the statement that no Dems are corrupt. Unfortunately, corruption is not limited to just one party.

Sadly, I could name a few Dem mayors convicted of taking money. One of them is making sounds like he wants to get back into politics. Smh.

betsuni

(25,374 posts)
55. Nobody said no Democrats are corrupt.
Fri Nov 27, 2020, 08:26 AM
Nov 2020

Sadly, people these days don't know what a generalization is.

 

cwydro

(51,308 posts)
63. "Democrats are not bribed by billionaires and are not corrupt."
Fri Nov 27, 2020, 01:08 PM
Nov 2020

Pretty clear statement to me. Perhaps a qualifier like “most” might have helped.

Sad thing about some of these public officials I mentioned...most of then were bribed for very small amounts of money. Many were bought for a few grand. Sad.

panader0

(25,816 posts)
9. AOC may have a problem with speaking out un-politically,
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 08:32 AM
Nov 2020

but what she says is usually spot on. This statement is very good. I believe she has a real place in our
party's future.
The part about "systems" money, as she describes it, is insightful.

 

AmericanCanuck

(1,102 posts)
38. What she wrote is actually a paraphrased version of Karl Marx
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 11:53 PM
Nov 2020

and his statements about private ownership of means of production.

Tom Rinaldo

(22,911 posts)
12. I SO agree with what she said
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 04:40 PM
Nov 2020

I still pinch myself sometimes that someone like her has achieved the prominence that she has already, in her early 30's!

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
17. She's a troublemaker of the good trouble kind.
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 05:01 PM
Nov 2020

Loyal to her moral compass no matter the consequences.

Kid Berwyn

(14,795 posts)
18. Bring that message to Georgia.
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 05:18 PM
Nov 2020

Explain how Moscow Mitch works for the billionaires, especially the Russian oligarchs, and it might prove effective across socioeconomic, generational and party lines.

 

AmericanCanuck

(1,102 posts)
56. So far the warriors are mainly fighting on twitter
Fri Nov 27, 2020, 08:42 AM
Nov 2020

to please the 15% of Democrats who dig such wars.

The message turns off most of the Democrats who are not on DU or another similar forum.

There are better ways to achieve social justice than socialism. Socialism's historical track record around the world is disastrous.

Kid Berwyn

(14,795 posts)
59. Maybe if AOC delivered her message directly...
Fri Nov 27, 2020, 12:09 PM
Nov 2020

...it would be better received.

For instance, she was met with popular acclaim when she discussed on Fox News how humanity must redesign the global economy in order to address climate change, the Green New Deal. Yet, the conservatives do all they can to demonize her and her message.

I don’t know about you, but I hate having right wing assholes distort what I say.

 

AmericanCanuck

(1,102 posts)
60. The green new deal is not a plan
Fri Nov 27, 2020, 12:16 PM
Nov 2020

It is only a wish list. It sounds great to talk about it but the hard work is in actually comping up with a plan which the squad doesn't have. Slogans and platitudes only go so far beyond the fan club. Rest demand an actual workable plan that will pass congress.

 

AmericanCanuck

(1,102 posts)
33. I know what it means and I stand by my statement
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 11:49 PM
Nov 2020

Voters in Georgia are not going to study the microscopic nuances between socialists and social democrats. To most people it is one and the same.

By the way, there is no such thing as "Democratic socialist" -- there are "Social Democrats" and there are "Socialists."

Democratic socialist was a term coined by some to take the edge off the socialist thing but their economic message is identical to that of the socialists.

 

PTWB

(4,131 posts)
42. Shrug.
Fri Nov 27, 2020, 12:14 AM
Nov 2020

You’re talking about your perception of voters in GA. To have any meaningful discussion about your perception we must first establish a baseline of how you are defining socialism. You’ve refused to define it.

To me that means you’re either not confident in your perception or don’t know how to articulate your understanding of socialism.

 

PTWB

(4,131 posts)
46. Oh?
Fri Nov 27, 2020, 01:12 AM
Nov 2020

You opined that socialism wouldn’t sell in GA. I asked you how you defined socialism and you couldn’t (or wouldn’t) answer. 🤷🏻?♂️

 

PTWB

(4,131 posts)
49. How?
Fri Nov 27, 2020, 02:33 AM
Nov 2020

You gave your opinion that GA voters would reject socialism but then couldn’t (or wouldn’t) share your definition socialism.

You keep repeating “non sequitur” when you could have easily shared your definition any time you wanted to. You choose not to. I’m sure anyone following this thread will be able to infer why.

Violet_Crumble

(35,955 posts)
51. I was going to ask for their definition of non sequitur...
Fri Nov 27, 2020, 02:59 AM
Nov 2020

I suspect that's another word that doesn't mean what they think it means

Violet_Crumble

(35,955 posts)
50. You were asked what your definition of socialism was and refused to answer...
Fri Nov 27, 2020, 02:55 AM
Nov 2020

That has nothing to do with personalities. I'm also curious to know how you define socialism. I understand that a lot of Americans throw the terms communist and socialist around like they're weapons and have little to no grasp of what the definitions are, so I think it's very reasonable to expect that anyone on the Left who does it should be willing to define terms when they use them in earlier posts...

R B Garr

(16,950 posts)
53. Exactly. Voters aren't going to waste time being browbeaten,
Fri Nov 27, 2020, 05:33 AM
Nov 2020

scolded and talked down to about what socialism means. If we look at the election results, we see the losses which confirms not even Democrats want to change the party to socialism. How many more losses until they get the message.

radius777

(3,635 posts)
61. AOC is not to the left of FDR
Fri Nov 27, 2020, 12:33 PM
Nov 2020

when it comes to economics, one of the greatest presidents in American history.

AOC is a progressive who supports a larger social safety net etc - call it democratic socialism or social democracy or whatever - but this idea held by some that she is a radical is absurd.

On most issues I'm the typical Clinton/Obama Dem - but this party is never going to be a force until we listen to progressives - many of whom are highly intelligent like AOC and bring a fresh perspective.

We lost seats in Congress not because of 'the radical left' or whatever the media would have us believe. Bustos/DCCC ran a very bland campaign that appealed to nobody, that was the problem. We need to stand for things and defend our base better, as voters may not know much about politics but they can sense when a party is embarassed about its base. The Repubs are the worst but they never 'forsake' their own.

bullwinkle428

(20,628 posts)
41. Do you think a $15 minimum wage falls under the blanket of "socialism"?
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 11:59 PM
Nov 2020

Because that passed in a state that also voted for Trump.

 

AmericanCanuck

(1,102 posts)
44. No it does not
Fri Nov 27, 2020, 01:05 AM
Nov 2020

Minimum wage increase has always been a part of mainstream Democratic priorities. It is ludicrous for the far left to claim credit for it.

Many mainstream Democrats have championed an increase in minimum wage. It is hypocritical to attribute it solely to the ultra-left.

betsuni

(25,374 posts)
48. Fight for Fifteen began in 2012 and became a national movement.
Fri Nov 27, 2020, 01:17 AM
Nov 2020

Cities like Seattle passed $15 minimum wage years ago. Grassroots movement. No connection with Bernie Sanders/Justice Democrats so not connected with "socialism." They took up the $15 minimum wage fight years later.

Response to bullwinkle428 (Reply #41)

Response to melman (Original post)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This by @AOC .