Over 30 Trump Campaign Lawsuits Have Failed. Some Rulings Are Scathing.

[Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin]

Judges, a generally sober lot, are not as a rule given to snark, sarcasm or outbursts of emotion in their orders.

But in the nearly three dozen lawsuits challenging the 2020 election that the Trump campaign and its proxies have either lost or withdrawn in recent weeks, a number of judges have lost patience.

Here are some scathing excerpts from their rulings:

Pennsylvania

Oct. 10

“Perhaps Plaintiffs are right that guards should be placed near drop boxes, signature-analysis experts should examine every mail-in ballot, poll watchers should be able to man any poll regardless of location, and other security improvements should be made. But the job of an unelected federal judge isn’t to suggest election improvements, especially when those improvements contradict the reasoned judgment of democratically elected officials.”

-more-

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/over-30-trump-campaign-lawsuits-have-failed-some-rulings-are-scathing/ar-BB1bmfdv?li=BBnb7Kz

[C_U_L8R]

1. They should pay the courts and everyone's legal fees

For wasting the world's time with this frivolous and delusional nonsense.