General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIf a slogan or term was hurting dem down ballot that bad polling SHOULD HAVE picked up on it.
Please STOP Normalizing horrid down ballot polling with anecdotes about slogans and terms.
Look, no other developed country has had polling this inaccurate for this long tilted towards one party, *** NONE ]***. Even when polling accounts for lack or abundance of types of phones, lack of honesty, shyness or anything else you can think of cause (polling data can weight all that) US polling has gotten it too wrong for too long.
Polling is mostly a science, not art and that science being this off in 2020 down ballots should be explained and the polling firms be held accountable.
Polling is important, if a slogan or term were overall denting approval of a candidate they need to be able to react to it properly. So far there's no data that a slogan or term explains down ballot aggregate polling being being this bad for a second presidential election in a row.
We need to hold the political information outlets and polling firms account for horrible polling, the fact that we're guessing the detriment of a slogan on dem down ballots is a tell tale itself somethings very very off.
what say you?
thx in advance
aeromanKC
(3,322 posts)uponit7771
(90,301 posts)mcar
(42,278 posts)Polling sucked.
Beakybird
(3,330 posts)Was it bad polling?
Was it malfeasance with ballot counting?
Was it the power of misinformation?
Was it bad messaging?
It will take several months for data scientists to figure out what factors were most responsible for the Democrats' underperformance.
ancianita
(35,932 posts)I could be wrong, but even if there are, there's no poll or correlation made between the phrase polls and if those were key reasons the down ballot votes went Republican.
So in general, I agree with you. Whether these flogged issues make us nervous, doesn't mean down ballot votes would have been any different.
Stinky The Clown
(67,761 posts)ancianita
(35,932 posts)uponit7771
(90,301 posts)unblock
(52,116 posts)Pollsters keep having to adjust their models to account for the ever-changing suppression.
You can't easily just ask people prior to an election if their vote has been suppressed because they often don't know yet.
They think they're still registered, they think they gave the right address, they think they'll be able to get to the polling location easily, they think they'll be able to vote on their lunch break, they think their id is considered valid or that they can get one easily and free, etc.
It's often not until Election Day that they find out they can't vote.
And shockingly, these tend to be people in democratic areas or with names that sound like maybe they're democrats.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)showing up at polls and not being able to vote? Its too easy to check ones registration nowadays.
unblock
(52,116 posts)Even if they do know, I'm not sure pollsters are asking or if they'd get the right answers.
I'm guessing many people figure they'll be able to fix whatever "clerical issue" there may be preventing them from voting but maybe that never happens. And people might not know to get a provisional ballot or might not be able to supply the documentation needs to make it valid.
I agree that some of this has improved, at least the availability of information. But I don't know if that's enough to help the polls.
stopdiggin
(11,242 posts)as is the OP. It's simplistic to claim that the entire down ballot issue was due to one (or two) particular slogans. It's also simplistic to attempt to write them off with the argument -- "because - polls!"
There were a heck of a lot of things going on in this election -- including the fact that it turns out a certain amount of black and brown skinned voters, and suburban white women for that matter -- kinda' like the macho, tellin' it like it is, trade wars are easy, stickin' it to the libs! -- Trump brand. Unfortunate as hell -- but them's the truth, brother.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Klaralven
(7,510 posts)https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/americans-like-the-ideas-behind-defunding-the-police-more-than-the-slogan-itself/
Poll: Sanders Rises, But Socialism Isn't Popular With Most Americans
https://www.npr.org/2020/02/19/807047941/poll-sanders-rises-but-socialism-isnt-popular-with-most-americans
uponit7771
(90,301 posts)... that dems overwhelming owned.
There's no data showing that's the reason polling was so off and it should show some data that those terms affected dem down ballot candidates,...
there wasn't any.
There still isn't any either.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Democratic Senatorial candidates in Georgia. Warnock has some good rebuttals, but it is definitely an issue.
Socialism, Marxism, etc., are included in a lot of GOPer attack ads.
My guess, and sorrow, is that it will likely be effective in runoffs. I hope not enough, but . . . . .
Yavin4
(35,421 posts)What are they doing polling wise that these media outlets are not doing?
uponit7771
(90,301 posts)Also, how did the polling in SC get it so wrong where Harrison put over 50 million in his campaign and lost big time.
Did Harrison know the polling outside of his campaign was off?
Really strange in this country we get the polling so off for so long
world wide wally
(21,738 posts)are never polled because they stay out of the mix and live in the woods and abandoned building and other out of the way places. They have no permanent addresses by which to find them. Then they show up on election day to vote Republican because they think it is freedumb to vote that way.
When you think about it, it makes sense.
sweetloukillbot
(10,972 posts)They were expecting a big turnout on the Dem side, but I don't think anyone was expecting so huge a turnout on the Republican side. If the polls were weighted as such, I'd think they'd look the way the polling did before the election.
And I think a lot of the "Never Trumpers" were still Republicans at heart, and voted downballot accordingly. That seems to have borne out in Arizona.
stopdiggin
(11,242 posts)And will be voting R whether Obamacare is saving their life or not. Just because they're not real keen on a guy that wears diapers and ladles on the face makeup -- doesn't mean they given up on deregulation, 2nd amend, tax breaks and right to life! Please don't fool yourself!