General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCan a President pardon himself or others he's involved with committing crimes?
I don't think he can . He may try to , but it can't stand, or he could do anything he wants , even corrupt his elections. Can he pardon others he's involved with committing crimes. Again I think if challenged it can't stand or he could instruct them to break any laws he wants on his behalf knowing they will go scott free, letting corruption run wild using others for criminal purposes for personal benefits. It would also bypass the courts and put him, and others above the law, and make the Supreme Court powerless against corruption and criminals.
They would be idiots to rule making themselves targets for him without any consequences. They won't put the President above the rule of law, or we'll have more criminals running for office to abuse and escape justice. Even these justice should understand that.
beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)I hope he does both so these pardons can be invalidated and they face the full force of a Biden DOJ
Response to beachbumbob (Reply #1)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
no_hypocrisy
(46,061 posts)Meaning that all FUTURE crimes are prosecutable.
EnterwebsJohn
(87 posts)a criminal can be elligible to apply for a pardon (from the date of the federal conviction.) Is this just for the common man and not the elitist ruling class?
Specified in #3 here: https://www.justice.gov/pardon/pardon-information-and-instructions
Voltaire2
(12,984 posts)The constitution just grants the executive the power to pardon. Except for impeachment, no other limits are mentioned.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)But a president isn't required to follow it and can pardon anyone at any point in time and regardless whether they submitted a pardon petition through DOJ.
Maxheader
(4,371 posts)On the pardoning, going on. What can be done, legally. You know some
of the wingers are pretty nuts right now...more so than usual ...
Thought I saw a news clip on stumpys kids getting pardons?...
2naSalit
(86,502 posts)Was on Lawrence O'Donnell's show last night and he had a very good discussion on the topic.
Voltaire2
(12,984 posts)And anyone who claims they know how this Supremely Fucked Up Court is going to rule is not thinking clearly.
beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)no way this SC is going to validate either a self-pardon or a "general get out jail free pardons" for crimes known and not known, In nixon's case, the ford pardon had a specified time frame the pardon was applicable, the term of Nixon serving s president, so even a self pardon, following the Nixon precedent, it would ONLY apply to crimes trump committed between Jan 2017 and Jan 2021, and would not shield him for all the crimes he and his minions did prior to being elected. Either way trump is fucked and ONLY recourse is to leave the country. NEW investigations into additional crimes can be had at the federal level on all those who received a trump pardon as a pardon is tied to specific crime/convictions
Hugin
(33,106 posts)Say the President has political rivals he wants gone. With a time limited blanket pardon he gathers a group of thugs pre-blanket pardons them and they go kidnap the rivals without legal ramifications.
beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)use of a pardon as a criminal act enabler will not be looked upon kindly either. The are some basic fundamentals of the law that even conservative judges will uphold
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)indictment are permitted.
Nixon was pardoned for any crimes he committed or may have committed at any time during his presidency, although he was never indicted or convicted of any wrongdoing.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)that the federal courts are in Trump's pocket and will trample all over the Constitution in his service who are not thinking clearly.
Hugin
(33,106 posts)In the latter case I can see someone getting a get-out-of-jail-for-life card and then going on a crime spree from then on. What's the point of having laws, if this class of people can be created who are above them?
NYC Liberal
(20,135 posts)not future ones. So in your example, a president could pardon them after their crimes but not essentially immunize them for life.
beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)"pre-preemptive pardon" for unknown crimes committed. No court is going to uphold such a pardon as being valid.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)The actual distinction is between a pardon granted for any and all crimes committed up until the date of the pardon ("blanket" pardon) and a pardon for future crimes committed after the date of the pardon ("pre-emptive" pardon). The first is permissible. The second is not.
NYC Liberal
(20,135 posts)X is pardoned for any and all crimes that might have been committed vs X is pardoned for these specific offenses? The latter was given by Ford to Nixon: