Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums'An Indelible Stain': How the G.O.P. Tried to Topple a Pillar of Democracy
The Supreme Court repudiation of President Trump was also a blunt rebuke to Republican leaders who had put their interests ahead of the countrys.The Supreme Court repudiation of President Trumps desperate bid for a second term not only shredded his effort to overturn the will of voters: It also was a blunt rebuke to Republican leaders in Congress and the states who were willing to damage American democracy by embracing a partisan power grab over a free and fair election.
The courts decision on Friday night, an inflection point after weeks of legal flailing by Mr. Trump and ahead of the Electoral College vote for President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr. on Monday, leaves the presidents party in an extraordinary position. Through their explicit endorsements or complicity of silence, much of the G.O.P. leadership now shares responsibility for the quixotic attempt to ignore the nations founding principles and engineer a different verdict from the one voters cast in November.
Many regular Republicans supported this effort, too a sign that Mr. Trump has not just bent the party to his will, but pressed a mainstay of American politics for nearly two centuries into the service of overturning an election outcome and assaulting public faith in the electoral system. The G.O.P. sought to undo the vote by such spurious means that the Supreme Court quickly rejected the argument.
Even some Republican leaders delivered a withering assessment of the 126 G.O.P. House members and 18 attorneys general who chose to side with Mr. Trump over the democratic process, by backing a lawsuit that asked the Supreme Court to throw out some 20 million votes in four key states that cemented the presidents loss.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/12/us/politics/trump-lawsuits-electoral-college.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 589 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'An Indelible Stain': How the G.O.P. Tried to Topple a Pillar of Democracy (Original Post)
Zorro
Dec 2020
OP
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(107,922 posts)1. K&R
AmericanCanuck
(1,102 posts)2. If .. I mean when .. Trump and his cabal are indicted
and convicted ... these same repukes will say "Trump who?" "ohhhhh .... that Trump ... I was always against him and if not for me, he would have been much worse."
Let's save all the tweets and video-clips to make them eat sand.
For instance, last month Mr. Graham said during an interview on Fox & Friends that a signature verification machine in Clark County, Nevada, which encompasses Las Vegas, was used improperly to accept every signature whether it was fraudulent or not. In the same interview, he shared an allegation that people in the county were spotted filling out fraudulent ballots on a Biden/Harris truck.
Those allegations were contained in a lawsuit Republicans filed in the state. Last week a judge found that the signature machine in question had, in fact, sent 70 percent of the signatures it scanned back to election workers for human verification. The record does not support allegations that the machine accepted signatures that should have been rejected, wrote the judge, James T. Russell. Similarly, he ruled, a witness account about false ballots filled out on a Biden/Harris vehicle was not credible.
On Friday, a spokesman for Mr. Graham declined to address those findings and said the senator continues to have grave concerns about the expanded use of mail in ballots.
In a hearing about the 2020 election in Wisconsin led by statehouse Republicans on Friday, witnesses suggested the state faced election interference from the dead dictators Hugo Chavez and Joseph Stalin, Facebook chief executive Mark Zuckerberg and Kanye West.
Some of the claims were similar to conspiracy theories contained in suits filed by a conservative lawyer, Sidney Powell, whose attempts to overturn the election results have been regularly rejected by judges. One wrote that a case she brought on behalf of Republican plaintiffs seemed to have been more about the impact of their allegations on peoples faith in the democratic process as well as trust in our government.
Those allegations were contained in a lawsuit Republicans filed in the state. Last week a judge found that the signature machine in question had, in fact, sent 70 percent of the signatures it scanned back to election workers for human verification. The record does not support allegations that the machine accepted signatures that should have been rejected, wrote the judge, James T. Russell. Similarly, he ruled, a witness account about false ballots filled out on a Biden/Harris vehicle was not credible.
On Friday, a spokesman for Mr. Graham declined to address those findings and said the senator continues to have grave concerns about the expanded use of mail in ballots.
In a hearing about the 2020 election in Wisconsin led by statehouse Republicans on Friday, witnesses suggested the state faced election interference from the dead dictators Hugo Chavez and Joseph Stalin, Facebook chief executive Mark Zuckerberg and Kanye West.
Some of the claims were similar to conspiracy theories contained in suits filed by a conservative lawyer, Sidney Powell, whose attempts to overturn the election results have been regularly rejected by judges. One wrote that a case she brought on behalf of Republican plaintiffs seemed to have been more about the impact of their allegations on peoples faith in the democratic process as well as trust in our government.