Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDid Trump veto the NDAA because of its anti-money laundering provision?
Link to tweet
https://fortune.com/2020/12/26/ndaa-2021-shell-companies-corporate-transparency-act/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
10 replies, 1368 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Did Trump veto the NDAA because of its anti-money laundering provision? (Original Post)
LymphocyteLover
Dec 2020
OP
Yes, I believe that was the prime reason, else he'd have to disclose the funders of his shell comps.
TheBlackAdder
Dec 2020
#1
it makes sense... what's funny/annoying is how he keeps coming up with different excuses
LymphocyteLover
Dec 2020
#4
It's long past time we cleaned up the dark money paths through shell companies world wide.
Wounded Bear
Dec 2020
#9
TheBlackAdder
(28,070 posts)1. Yes, I believe that was the prime reason, else he'd have to disclose the funders of his shell comps.
LymphocyteLover
(5,601 posts)2. makes sense!
The troops be damned
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)3. Your are so spot on.
That is the number one reason. He knows his Crime Syndicate would have to post all of the Sources as well as the Names associated with his funding sources.
LymphocyteLover
(5,601 posts)4. it makes sense... what's funny/annoying is how he keeps coming up with different excuses
which means he's lying (of course)
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)10. Typical Mob Boss
operation. And he has been doing this for forty years.
Wounded Bear
(58,436 posts)5. As always, follow the money...
LymphocyteLover
(5,601 posts)6. True-- that usually works!!
Wounded Bear
(58,436 posts)9. It's long past time we cleaned up the dark money paths through shell companies world wide.
High end real estate and fine art are two huge categories of things traded through these instruments.
Any company/corporation that wants to operate in the public sphere should do so openly.
Autumn
(44,746 posts)7. I had heard someone say that the bill was veto proof. What happened?
Wounded Bear
(58,436 posts)8. That just means that there seems to be enough votes to overturn it...
if everyone who voted for it the first time re-votes to pass it.