Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 811 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (20)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trickle down economics (Original Post)
demmiblue
Jan 2021
OP
czarjak
(12,150 posts)1. A Real Laffer?
SledDriver
(2,075 posts)2. Trickle Down Economics
Tiger8
(432 posts)3. A sign of Free Market, Tickle down economies
Free market economics is just another name for the few rich people to get away with anything....while the poor are pitted against each other in Hunger Games fashion.
The USA has been headed in that direction for 40 years.
Gothmog
(151,651 posts)4. Tax cuts do not work
There is no tax cut fairy and tax cuts for the rich do not work in the real world
Link to tweet
Tax cuts for rich people breed inequality without providing much of a boon to anyone else, according to a study of the advanced world that could add to the case for the wealthy to bear more of the cost of the coronavirus pandemic.
The paper, by David Hope of the London School of Economics and Julian Limberg of Kings College London, found that such measures over the last 50 years only really benefited the individuals who were directly affected, and did little to promote jobs or growth.
Policy makers shouldnt worry that raising taxes on the rich to fund the financial costs of the pandemic will harm their economies, Hope said in an interview....
The authors applied an analysis amalgamating a range of levies on income, capital and assets in 18 OECD countries, including the U.S. and U.K., over the past half century.
Their findings published Wednesday counter arguments, often made in the U.S., that policies which appear to disproportionately aid richer individuals eventually feed through to the rest of the economy. The timespan of the paper ends in 2015, but Hope says such an analysis would also apply to President Donald Trumps tax cut enacted in 2017.
Our research suggests such policies dont deliver the sort of trickle-down effects that proponents have claimed, Hope said.
The paper, by David Hope of the London School of Economics and Julian Limberg of Kings College London, found that such measures over the last 50 years only really benefited the individuals who were directly affected, and did little to promote jobs or growth.
Policy makers shouldnt worry that raising taxes on the rich to fund the financial costs of the pandemic will harm their economies, Hope said in an interview....
The authors applied an analysis amalgamating a range of levies on income, capital and assets in 18 OECD countries, including the U.S. and U.K., over the past half century.
Their findings published Wednesday counter arguments, often made in the U.S., that policies which appear to disproportionately aid richer individuals eventually feed through to the rest of the economy. The timespan of the paper ends in 2015, but Hope says such an analysis would also apply to President Donald Trumps tax cut enacted in 2017.
Our research suggests such policies dont deliver the sort of trickle-down effects that proponents have claimed, Hope said.