Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Hey, wouldn't voter fraud be easier to detect if turnout was SUPPOSED to be 100%?
Instead of making it harder to vote...
If everybody voted and it raised a red flag when someone didn't...
You'd get 100%, a number that you NEED to have across the entire country.
Any number other than 100, there's something wrong:
A policy failure
Record keeping failure
And if that number is higher than 100, in addition to census records not matching up, it could indeed be a case of voter fraud
But no, apparently the only way to combat voter fraud is to make it harder to vote, right?
