General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPresident Obama on the death of Prince Philip...
https://www.facebook.com/barackobama/Barack Obama
We shouldnt have worried. The Queen and Prince Philip immediately put us at ease with their grace and generosity, turning a ceremonial occasion into something far more natural, even comfortable. Prince Philip in particular was kind and warm, with a sharp wit and unfailing good humor. It was our first introduction to the man behind the title, and in the years since, our admiration for him has only grown. We will miss him dearly.
Like the Queen, Prince Philip saw world wars and economic crises come and go. The radio gave way to the television, and the television to the internet. And through it all, he helped provide steady leadership and guiding wisdom. It has long been said that the United States and Great Britain have a special relationship one that has been maintained and strengthened not just by presidents and prime ministers but by the Royal Family that has outlasted them all.
At the Queens side or trailing the customary two steps behind, Prince Philip showed the world what it meant to be a supportive husband to a powerful woman. Yet he also found a way to lead without demanding the spotlight serving in combat in World War II, commanding a frigate in the Royal Navy, and tirelessly touring the world to champion British industry and excellence. Through his extraordinary example, he proved that true partnership has room for both ambition and selflessness all in service of something greater.
As the world mourns his loss, we send our warmest wishes and deepest sympathies to the Queen, their children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren; and everyone who knew and loved this remarkable man.
Arkansas Granny
(31,855 posts)MaryMagdaline
(7,911 posts)lunatica
(53,410 posts)I hope Biden calls on him in the hard times. I hope Dr Jill and Michelle communicate with each other also. Theyre all wonderful people!
Chautauquas
(4,472 posts)I imagine if he did it was a lot of bullshit about how the election was stolen and oh yeah some English big-shot died.
NYC Liberal
(20,351 posts)because he very clearly did not write the statement:
Prince Philip defined British dignity and grace. He personified the quiet reserve, stern fortitude, and unbending integrity of the United Kingdom. As a young man, he served Britain honorably and courageously as a naval officer in the Second World War. Aboard battleships in the Mediterranean, he saw combat at sea. He then participated in the pivotal Allied invasion of Sicily in 1943. Like so many of his generation, in Britains darkest hour, he put his life on the line for God, country, and the values of freedom and self-government that forever unite America and the United Kingdom.
For seven decades, Prince Philip brought the same sense of duty and purpose to his role as consort and husband to the Queen. He was admired by his fellow citizens, and respected by everyone around the world. His exceptional example of service, constancy, and patriotism will be his greatest legacy. Over the past few years, Melania and I were honored to have the opportunity to visit the United Kingdom. We saw firsthand how the Monarchy epitomizes and carries on the virtues of the British Peopleand no one did so more than Prince Philip.
As we grieve his loss, we celebrate his memory and rededicate ourselves to the values to which he devoted his extraordinary life. He will be greatly missed.
If he was still on Twitter, no doubt wed have heard his real thoughts on the matter a few minutes after this was released.
Chautauquas
(4,472 posts)no way Trump could write anything nearly as coherent as those statements.
MLAA
(18,653 posts)BobTheSubgenius
(11,804 posts)Even more to the point! NOICE!
3catwoman3
(25,570 posts)...words.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)It's ridiculous for anyone to even try to sell that lie.
niyad
(120,395 posts)tavernier
(13,270 posts)he didnt write it.
GETPLANING
(846 posts)So I strongly doubt he even knows anything about this statement being written for him.
lpbk2713
(43,201 posts)"Such a great guy. Phil and I go back a long way."
Martin Eden
(13,538 posts)Marcuse
(8,038 posts)TxGuitar
(4,280 posts)But please, Philip was the UK Donald Trump on steroids. A racist entitled piece of shit that lived that long because he owned half of England and could afford proper healthcare. Fuck him and all of his family.
bluecollar2
(3,622 posts)I feel obligated to tell you to go fuck off yourself. As a Texan you should know better...
TxGuitar
(4,280 posts)Aristocrats think being born into aristocracy is an achievement.
Treefrog
(4,170 posts)Thank you.
efhmc
(15,023 posts)privileged male on steroids.
ttps://www.cnn.com/2021/04/09/uk/prince-philip-outbursts-legacy-intl-gbr-cmd/index.html
https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2017/8/13/the-priceless-racism-of-the-duke-of-edinburgh
Why in the world do you still have this anachronistic firm anyway?
LiberalLovinLug
(14,381 posts)Just to play the Devil's advocate, I do think one must view a life on balance, and in historical context.
I read the article in your link. It lists some of his racist comments through the years. It doesn't give dates to those statements, but I will presume most came from an earlier time in his life. When the world, or at least western culture, did not consider making jokes about stereotypes of different races to be systemically harmful. When I was a boy, I played cowboys and indians. Complete with making "woo woo woo" sounds and face paint. No one wanted to play the indian though because they had to lose. And if they did win, it was an injustice. We only were mimicking the films on TV, and our other friends. No one told us not to, or why it might be harmful.
There were also a host of comedians I grew up with, who would go on popular TV talk shows, and crack jokes at the expense of other nationalities and races. Even white people stereotypes. Through the years, especially with more multiculturalism in western countries, eyes were opened to the potential lasting hurt and harm under the surface of buttressing those stereotypes......even if one couldn't help laughing at the same time.
And if I had heard some comedian crack joke about a (white) Briton's over-bite, or lack of quality traditional food dishes, or even the hooliganism at soccer matches, if it was a funny line, even at the expense of our British friends, I would laugh too. One of the reasons for such unguarded laughter was knowing that a person from the UK would probably laugh at it too. That was important. As they, like I was, were brought up to laugh at themselves. British are maybe the best at that (Monty Python to Spitting Image).
So they, and the rest of the majority white privileged nations, just ASSumed that this kind of jaded humour was accepted the world over. Does that make it all right? Of course not. Many things have not stood the test of time, and humanities evolving sensibilities. White people, as am I, have learned that it was easy to assume that these other cultures would take these depreciating jokes the same as someone who has the luxury of reacting to one about themselves from a position of authority and privilege.
I just think it is a bit unfair to judge a 99 year old man, during his whole life, on some dumb "jokes" he, and most others in his country, thought were done in a more jestful, ribbing way at the time. A, perhaps, clumsy way to break the ice. My point being that it was not done with harmful intent, quite the opposite. But through time we have, the majority at least, come to a greater understanding of how words, especially coming from authority figures (such as The Former Guy), can have a profound negative impact on a person in the minority, and/or without voice or representation.
TxGuitar
(4,280 posts)That he never apologized for his remarks. He also said "One steps out with actresses, one does not marry them"
LiberalLovinLug
(14,381 posts)At least for the "as though it was put in by an Indian" comment.
But in that article also,
"However, Dr Shanfi Kauser, secretary of the Islamic Centre in Glasgow, said he was not offended. "He is a nice man and I don't think he has done anything out of malice," he said. "On other occasions he has been very complimentary to us. I think he should be excused."
I do think there is room for forgiveness when it is spoken not out of malice, but a misguided assumption of saying it in the context of a good natured ribbing.
Here in Canada, he had a good relationship with our First Nation people. He often visited them, and they respected him in turn because of his shared concern for environmental issues.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/prince-philip-remembered-indigenous-canada-1.5982711
"I knew that he was really big on climate change and environmental issues, so I thanked him for that," said Erasmus (the Dene national chief and regional chief for the Assembly of First Nations).
As they talked further, Erasmus was impressed by Philip's knowledge on the subject.
The prince criticized "how multinationals were approaching the environment, the great amount of wealth and the waste that they generated," and was keen "to keep the Earth pristine," Erasmus said.
Hekate
(95,015 posts)...of the upper classes and the occasion for keeping ones thoughts to oneself just a day longer.
Sorry they come out of the woodwork here every so often.
My late father in law lived to be 99. He came from a whole different world than we now live in, and in fact he helped create the world we live in by his service in WWII just as the late Prince did in his own very different way. People who live a century deserve to have their lives assessed in toto, not cherry-picked and judged as some are doing here.
efhmc
(15,023 posts)There is NO monarchy fit for a different i.e. "modern" time. It is a wasteful and disgustingly racist undemocratic anachronism.
BobTheSubgenius
(11,804 posts)DallasNE
(7,577 posts)mcar
(43,565 posts)to his wife for 73 years deserves credit. RIP Phil.
Prince Philip was a horrible, entitled human being who lived to 99 years because he had money. Dubious money. He was a racist piece of shit, prime fodder for a guillotine. The royals aren't better people, or even normal, moral people and they shouldn't be normalized. We as a global society need to realize that these people could end world hunger as we know it and still be stinking rich but they choose not to because they're horrible people. Rich does not equal smart, or moral, or caring. Having the money they have means quite the opposite. They are monsters that prey on the good people of this earth.
FakeNoose
(35,889 posts)... but how about saving this for another time. Hmmm?
No need to dress up a pig. If Chauvin dies should we wait a certain amount of time before reminding g everyone he was a murderer?
TxGuitar
(4,280 posts)He didn't earn, didn't work for. He and his family are essentially the descendants of gangsters. And they're still gangsters.
Treefrog
(4,170 posts)to Chauvin? Seriously?
Ilsa
(62,263 posts)who is grieving a loss. We say nothing at all, instead of rant, out of respect for friends and loved ones, not all of which are guilty of your judgments.
Not intentionally hurting people who are already in pain is part of being in a civil society, regardless of how you feel about the recently departed.
Response to TxGuitar (Reply #16)
Iggo This message was self-deleted by its author.
Did I say that anywhere in my post? Good heavens, I was commenting on the longevity of their marriage and the fact that he took a subservient role in the relationship.
TxGuitar
(4,280 posts)And rich and fooled around whenever he wanted, had awesome health care, never worked, looked down disdainfully at his inferiors (all of us), owned half of London, born on third base and thought he hit a triple. That was an arranged marriage and they both came to an arrangement on how things would go. I can't believe people on DU would defend or support monarchy. These people are the British Koch brothers.
mcar
(43,565 posts)Treefrog
(4,170 posts)I hear an ax grinding somewhere, but no idea why.
mwooldri
(10,421 posts)At least from 1948. National Health Service.
This was not an arranged marriage. Philip and Elizabeth had been corresponding for years before their engagement. As descended from the Greek and Danish thrones, he hardly owned "half of London".
Land in London that is owned by the Crown isn't property that personally belongs to the Royals - just like the White House does not personally belong to the President.
Never worked? Ha! Serving onboard a warship in WW2 doesn't count? And then when he did become consort to the Queen he was a working Royal and took his job seriously.
British Koch brothers? I wish the Koch brothers were like the royal family. The Royals champion general public good causes and keep their nose firmly outside of politics. And they have more environmentalism in their little fingers than any of the Kochs.
I am a monarchist. At least as far as the UK is. The Royal family know that the UK could decide to have different leadership in the future at any time (government decision or referendum). And while I may joke about Lizzie Windsor (my chosen nickname for the Queen) wanting to take back America I don't support a monarchy for America as it doesn't suit it. But for the UK the constitutional monarchy works and works well.
Besides the British royal establishment is a different creature when compared to the start of Elizabeth's reign.
TxGuitar
(4,280 posts)Last edited Sat Apr 10, 2021, 05:01 PM - Edit history (1)
King Edward VII is a private hospital. And many NHS hospitals have private wings. Hardly the same care, not to mention waiting list as your average punter. My source: my wife, who worked for the NHS
BuddhaGirl
(3,652 posts)Their marriage was not "arranged." Yes, Philip knew he would have to play second fiddle, but all reports say it was a love match.
Do you evidence to saying otherwise? Please post it.
meadowlander
(4,751 posts)Prince Phillip shouting from the deck of Britannia in Belize in 1994 to the Queen who was chatting to her hosts on the quayside.
This is not the proto-feminist ally you're looking for.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/lifestyle/prince-philip-husband-of-queen-elizabeth-ii-dies-a-life-of-duty-with-outrageous-moments/IHWNQUJYBJJICUKAD5KZLVKQGU/
pazzyanne
(6,612 posts)twodogsbarking
(12,230 posts)describe a number of prominent people in the US during my life time and I am thirty years younger. While I don't agree I understand the times and the influences that formed peoples' opinions. When you grow up in a certain environment you are essentially taught and expected to join in. That is why change is slow and sometimes backward. Anger and picking fights only exacerbates problems.
pazzyanne
(6,612 posts)I am so tired of passionate outbursts that don't solve problems but only serve to inflame. We now have an abundance of judgemental claptrap that serves no purpose in our world. I miss the expressions of sanity that has eroded during the past 4 or 5 years.
twodogsbarking
(12,230 posts)Hope you find your calm. I am still trying.
Ilsa
(62,263 posts)So much for trying to live in a decent society.
efhmc
(15,023 posts)democracy.
marieo1
(1,402 posts)Thank you, President Obama..........we still love you and you speak for all of us as do President Biden and the Vice President!!
hollygolively
(87 posts)President Obama is the exact type of person who makes us all proud. His comments always make me proud.
geardaddy
(25,361 posts)than Prince Philip had in his whole being.
demigoddess
(6,675 posts)Study the british nobility and your opinion might change, txguitar. Members of the nobility have been in the British military. And have served in many other ways. I read those 'racist' remarks. Not as racist as I was led to believe. Serving in a system that does not allow retirement at age 65, only upon death. I doubt if too many americans could do what they do.
NJCher
(38,080 posts)Especially about no retirement.
Also constantly attending to all those good causes is work.
TygrBright
(20,987 posts)Treefrog
(4,170 posts)He has shamed some people here simply by showing the class he was born with. Thank you President Obama.
Demovictory9
(33,862 posts)Joinfortmill
(16,552 posts)SmartVoter22
(639 posts)In 1961, Prince Phillip did a TV interview. Its the first time any member of the Royal Family was on live television.
It took until 1961 to get on live TV?
His wife decided using TV was a good thing for "The Firm" and Philip helped keep a tight reign on the organization.
He embraced TV as a tool to be used, and they have, as a 'state family' excelled at using it, but at times could not contain troubles.
The Prince was always a strong supporter of technologies. He was involved in many of the tech advances as they developed, during World War II. Things like; He was around when Radar was demonstrated in 1935 ...in Britain.,
As a Naval leader, he had to be aware of Alan Turin's Enigma code decryption, the development geostationary satellites, fiber optics and LCD's were all British made inventions the Prince would have been aware of, and promoting trade of those technologies.
Phillip was a progressive human, all 99 years of him.
edit: ran spellchecker.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)A better person cannot be found. What a lovely tribute.
Hekate
(95,015 posts)heckles65
(606 posts)could be a real life Senator Bulworth: opening up and saying things everyone knew but no one else dared say.