what can be thought, who can't be monitored (MAHER, ROGAN). Too clueless to be "ironic" but they are the ones who claim to be more-Dem/Lib/DU- than ANYBODY ELSE! They seem to have missed the parts of Liberalism about free-thought, free-speech, and not being threatened by hearing out contrariness or *being* contrary!
As for MAHER, the big rap on him seems to be that he hosts wingnuts. Yet I see him as giving the wingnuts rope to hang themselves with and that he confronts them. Although he seems to have fondness for the wingnut women, like he doesn't mind banging them, just enough not to succumb to their wingnuttiness.
I like his anti-religion/theology. And anti-"royalty". Yes, he criticizes Dem strategies, but that is also a Dem/Lib virtue, looking inside for root causes and long term solutions instead of Wingnut looking outside for who to blame and throwing cash at cronies/contractors for non-solutions. We win by fixing what didn't work for us, not by digging in.
*******ON EDIT: DUer said it better than I:
By PCIntern:: "I will personally contact you and ask you what I’m permitted to think feel and say. In the future, I shall subject myself to censorship in order not to be able to express an opinion which tens of millions of other people possess. I don’t want you to be upset, I don’t want you to be agitated or put upon by me having an opinion or feelings."
= new reply since forum marked as read
