Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Rude Pundit: A Couple of Observations on the Republican War on Democracy
https://rudepundit.blogspot.com/2021/06/a-couple-of-observations-on-republican.htmlThe Rude Pundit
Proudly lowering the level of political discourse
6/02/2021
A Couple of Observations on the Republican War on Democracy
Observation 1: Most religions have a great tautological scam going: Faith means believing in God, Jesus, Allah, or another invisible sky wizard even in the absence of evidence. Oh, sure, you can say that your book of faith that was written centuries ago by drunk monks proves some things, but it doesn't, any more than comic books prove the existence of superheroes. And maybe you can point to a miracle or two, but even those are mostly easily debunked. Despite there being no tangible, demonstrative proof that the aforementioned sky wizard is real, people are still willing to fight each other over which sky wizard is bigger and more magical or to use their sky wizard to justify barbaric cruelties.
Yet, as stupid as all that seems, it makes more sense than the millions of Americans who believe that the 2020 election was stolen. Why? Because you also can't prove that God doesn't exist (yeah, yeah, proving a negative, I know), and that's what gives the faithful cover for their faith. When it comes to the Big Lie, the proof that it wasn't stolen, that there was virtually no voter fraud, that Joe Biden won fair and square and it really wasn't all that close overall doesn't matter at all. Facts, observable and verified and supported by everyone with any authority and/or expertise, are beside the point. Faith in the absence of evidence is one thing. Faith in the face of evidence that clearly demonstrates your faith is a lie is, to put it mildly, fucking frightening and fucking madness.
That's what makes this whole fight against the Cult of the Big Lie so frustrating. It's not like the evidence of a legitimate election is even open for interpretation. To disagree about it is like arguing with someone who looks at an ocean and says it's dry sand. At some point pretty quickly, you wanna say, "Okay, motherfucker, step on in," while you hope they don't drag you with them because they're gonna insist they're walking on solid ground until they drown.
snip//
Observation 2: If things were reversed, and one day it's pretty likely they will be, and Republicans controlled the House, the Senate, and the White House, and Democrats were blocking the GOP's agenda that they got elected on from being passed in the Senate, the filibuster would be shitcanned in a heartbeat. Hell, even if Democrats weren't blocking anything, the GOP would shitcan it because that's what dicks do, and the Republican Party right now is just a bag of dicks, more dickish than they've ever been in my lifetime, quite frankly, probably because they used to keeps their dicks in their pants and pretend they were doing things for some demonstrably real reason. Now? Fuck it. They've just got 'em whipped out and they're wavin' them around, daring you to tell 'em to put 'em away.
Yes, it's technically majority control, even if Republicans represent a significantly smaller part of the population, especially in the Senate, than Democrats, and even if the President only wins the electoral college and not the popular vote. Even in that terrifying moment, some on the left are optimists. The elimination of the filibuster would force Republicans to actually vote down bills that are popular. Although, more likely, a GOP Majority Leader just wouldn't bring them up for a vote at all, like what was done during the Obama administration by Mitch McConnell, who has the expression of someone who knows he sharted himself but is hoping there's no leakage.
Even more likely, a GOP congressional majority with a GOP president would immediately pass laws that would shape how the nation votes and assure that Democrats can't win a majority again. Those kinds of laws might include giving state legislatures the right to overturn elections or making it easier for them to do so. It might include stringent i.d. laws and restrictions on how and when people can vote and when they can register and so much more. If you don't believe that fucking up voting would be top of a Republican majority agenda, you have been asleep for the last six years.
And while this is, yes, about Democratic Senators Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema's bizarre (and perhaps even suspicious) insistence on preserving the filibuster, which isn't in the Constitution, it's mostly about how far Republicans continue to radicalize, from obstruction to destruction. To tie these both together, I think another huge danger is that Republicans have accepted that they have to do this or unleash a tide of violence. They have no beliefs except staying in power, so, fuck it, take the easiest, shittiest path to it. And once you decide to go down that path, fuck it. You may as well go enthusiastically. And these motherfuckers are skipping gleefully towards an authoritarian future.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
15 replies, 2442 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (53)
ReplyReply to this post
15 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Rude Pundit: A Couple of Observations on the Republican War on Democracy (Original Post)
babylonsister
Jun 2021
OP
Blue Owl
(50,288 posts)1. K&R for the Rude Dude
Martin Eden
(12,847 posts)2. K&R for R.P.
Rude Pundit on Point is a Pleasure to read.
Pepsidog
(6,254 posts)3. We can see that Rs would dump the filibuster in a heartbeat but they cannot. Very frustrating.
LudwigPastorius
(9,110 posts)4. K&R for the Impolite Acolyte
...the Coarse Force
...the Insolent Dissident
...the Cheeky Freaky
...the Babe Ruth of the Uncouth
babylonsister
(171,035 posts)7. Haha! Yep. nt
dlk
(11,514 posts)5. Republicans are following Victor Orban's playbook
Last edited Thu Jun 3, 2021, 09:36 AM - Edit history (1)
Step by step.
babylonsister
(171,035 posts)8. Never heard of him.
dlk
(11,514 posts)13. He's the Hungarian prime minister
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,966 posts)11. Never heard of him either. Poster is careless. Try
Two spelling mistakes in 11 letters.
Try Viktor Orbán.
I am unable to link the Wikipedia article, but if you type "Vikt" (without quote marks) into the Wikipedia search text field, his article will be the third or fourth one in the list offered. Or follow this link and the link in the first paragraph will take you to his article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_Minister_of_Hungary
Response to Bernardo de La Paz (Reply #11)
dlk This message was self-deleted by its author.
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,966 posts)15. Okay, thanks. Sorry for asserting you were careless. . . . nt
mountain grammy
(26,598 posts)6. K & R
JoeOtterbein
(7,699 posts)9. Yes, the repubs would change the filibuster in a second....
...Which is exactly why we need to do it first!!!
love_katz
(2,578 posts)10. Huge kick and rec.
The Rude One
Progressive Jones
(6,011 posts)12. K & R