Mon Jun 28, 2021, 07:57 AM
In It to Win It (6,491 posts)
Republicans are watching their states back weed - and they're not sold
POLITICO
Marijuana’s popularity boom in red states isn’t breaking through with conservatives on Capitol Hill, pinching an already narrow path to federal legalization.
A growing number of Republican senators represent states that have legalized recreational or medical cannabis — six approved or expanded marijuana in some form just since November. But without their support in Congress to make up for likely Democratic defectors, weed falls critically short of the 60 votes needed to advance legislation. Montana’s Steve Daines and South Dakota’s Mike Rounds, both Republicans, said they don’t support comprehensive federal cannabis reform, no matter what voters back home voted for. “I oppose it,” said Daines, who is otherwise a lead sponsor of the SAFE Banking Act, which would make it easier for the cannabis industry to access financial services, such as bank accounts and small business loans. “The people in Montana decided they want to have it legal in our state, and that's why I support the SAFE Banking Act as well — it’s the right thing to do — but I don't support federal legalization.”
|
9 replies, 1025 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
In It to Win It | Jun 2021 | OP |
bucolic_frolic | Jun 2021 | #1 | |
lark | Jun 2021 | #2 | |
bucolic_frolic | Jun 2021 | #4 | |
lark | Jun 2021 | #5 | |
GoCubsGo | Jun 2021 | #8 | |
lark | Jun 2021 | #9 | |
tavernier | Jun 2021 | #6 | |
lagomorph777 | Jun 2021 | #3 | |
GoodRaisin | Jun 2021 | #7 |
Response to In It to Win It (Original post)
Mon Jun 28, 2021, 08:08 AM
bucolic_frolic (37,297 posts)
1. It would be hard to keep the MAGAts angry if they were cannabis-ized /nt
Response to bucolic_frolic (Reply #1)
Mon Jun 28, 2021, 11:13 AM
lark (22,391 posts)
2. Thats why those Senators oppose it.
They want drunken crazy asses that will overturn elections for them.
|
Response to lark (Reply #2)
Mon Jun 28, 2021, 12:13 PM
bucolic_frolic (37,297 posts)
4. Thanks for completing my implied thought
It kind of only leads in one direction, doesn't it.
|
Response to lark (Reply #2)
Mon Jun 28, 2021, 12:39 PM
GoCubsGo (31,447 posts)
8. I suspect has more to do with it cutting into the profits of some of their big money donors.
Like Big Pharma and Big Ag. They fear more people will turn to cannabis products, rather than expensive drugs. Or, they'll start turning to its relative, hemp, over wood and cotton products.
|
Response to GoCubsGo (Reply #8)
Mon Jun 28, 2021, 12:48 PM
lark (22,391 posts)
9. I agree.
I think big pharma is the key but bet the other industries are players as well.
|
Response to bucolic_frolic (Reply #1)
Mon Jun 28, 2021, 12:25 PM
tavernier (11,461 posts)
6. I know several weed users who are deep into
Q.
|
Response to In It to Win It (Original post)
Mon Jun 28, 2021, 11:15 AM
lagomorph777 (30,613 posts)
3. Dumb move. Even MAGATS like their weed.
Response to In It to Win It (Original post)
Mon Jun 28, 2021, 12:33 PM
GoodRaisin (8,223 posts)