Statement by President Joe Biden on Department of Justice Filing, This about 9/11 documents.

The statement: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/08/09/statement-by-president-joe-biden-on-department-of-justice-filing/

An excerpt:

As I promised during my campaign, my Administration is committed to ensuring the maximum degree of transparency under the law, and to adhering to the rigorous guidance issued during the Obama-Biden Administration on the invocation of the state secrets privilege. In this vein, I welcome the Department of Justice’s filing today, which commits to conducting a fresh review of documents where the government has previously asserted privileges, and to doing so as quickly as possible.

5 replies, 1353 views

Thread info Bookmark this thread Trash this thread

Reply to this thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

5 replies	Author	Time	Post
Statement by President Joe Biden on Department of Justice Filing, This about 9/11 documents. (Original post)	ShazamIam	Aug 2021	OP
This message was self-deleted by its author	Chin music	Aug 2021	#1
I would like some of the Justice Department people Turmp fired be called back, Sally Yates for one.	ShazamIam	Aug 2021	#3
This message was self-deleted by its author	Chin music	Aug 2021	#4
While they're at it, they can lift the gag order on Sibel Edmonds.	Qutzupalotl	Aug 2021	#2
I didn't know of that one, thanks. What is impressive is that we have moved from when no public	ShazamIam	Aug 2021	#5

Response to Chin music (Reply #1)

Mon Aug 9, 2021, 04:19 PM

ShazamIam (2,477 posts)

3. I would like some of the Justice Department people Turmp fired be called back, Sally Yates for one.

Reply to this post

Response to ShazamIam (Original post)

Mon Aug 9, 2021, 04:14 PM

Qutzupalotl (13,699 posts)

2. While they're at it, they can lift the gag order on Sibel Edmonds.

She encountered something in her translator work that evidently conflicted with the official narrative, but she hasn't been allowed to say what it was.

Reply to this post

Response to Qutzupalotl (Reply #2)

Mon Aug 9, 2021, 04:21 PM

ShazamIam (2,477 posts)

5. I didn't know of that one, thanks. What is impressive is that we have moved from when no public

dissent or questioning was allowed. I remember that Obama had appointed Van Jones and then he was forced out because he had signed a petition calling for a new investigation.

So we have moved a long way from, no dissent about the 9/11 report allowed, to a new look at the documents.

Reply to this post