Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 02:36 AM Jan 2012

Religious Groups Given ‘Exception’ to Work Bias Law

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/12/us/supreme-court-recognizes-religious-exception-to-job-discrimination-laws.html?_r=1

Ok folks, this is why they want to privatize education. Now, CHURCH BUSINESS (schools) can hire and fire anyone they want. Find out a teacher is Gay, out he goes? A teacher goers to another church, out they go. Of course, add to it that now, not opnly can these Church schools get taxpayer funded money, they can be the preferred repcipents, making sure that no one in a community jhas ANY ACCESS TO EDUCATION, meaning that they get to use educations as a means of DOMINATION.

Of course, the only real challenge would be if, oh let's say, the scientololgists used this in their schools, or the Moonies, or even a Wahabbi Madrassa, but we all know that religious freedom here is freedom to be white and protestant. Hell, even Mitt can't shake the fact he is Mormon.
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Religious Groups Given ‘Exception’ to Work Bias Law (Original Post) DonCoquixote Jan 2012 OP
Give it rest-- even the ACLU agrees that... TreasonousBastard Jan 2012 #1
Can't find the ACLU statement...got a link? I did find this: Bluenorthwest Jan 2012 #3
One of their lawyers was on the radio yesterday... TreasonousBastard Jan 2012 #5
Churches say discrimination is a Sacrament. This decision stinks, yet it does stand as Bluenorthwest Jan 2012 #2
Basically, the Court punted...yes, businesses can do this... joeybee12 Jan 2012 #4

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
1. Give it rest-- even the ACLU agrees that...
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 08:11 AM
Jan 2012

this is a very limited decision and will have very few consequences.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
3. Can't find the ACLU statement...got a link? I did find this:
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 11:43 AM
Jan 2012

"Clergy who are fired for reasons unrelated to matters of theology – no matter how capricious or venal those reasons may be – have just had the courthouse door slammed in their faces," Rev. Barry W. Lynn, executive director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State.[link:http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/americas/united-states/120111/supreme-court-ministerial-exemption-job-discrimination-church

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
5. One of their lawyers was on the radio yesterday...
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 11:41 PM
Jan 2012

and said it was too bad for the plaintiff, but a very narrow decision and shouldn't have much of an effect overall.

As far as I can find, they only have their friend of the court brief on their site.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
2. Churches say discrimination is a Sacrament. This decision stinks, yet it does stand as
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 11:30 AM
Jan 2012

definition of the nature of these churches and other organizations.

 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
4. Basically, the Court punted...yes, businesses can do this...
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 11:47 AM
Jan 2012

But there are limits and the SCOTUS didn't define those...basically they said we can't agree except very narrowly...a cowardly decision, IMHO.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Religious Groups Given ‘E...