HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Remember the CO County Cl...

Sun Aug 22, 2021, 08:15 PM

Remember the CO County Clerk who is being investigated for breaching election security?

The Pillowfool is saying he is hiding her...

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/mike-lindell-tina-peters-colorado-q-b1906133.html

10 replies, 1107 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 10 replies Author Time Post
Reply Remember the CO County Clerk who is being investigated for breaching election security? (Original post)
Thomas Hurt Aug 22 OP
hlthe2b Aug 22 #1
marble falls Aug 22 #2
SCantiGOP Aug 22 #3
Deacon Blue Aug 22 #4
getagrip_already Aug 22 #5
crickets Aug 22 #6
hookaleft Aug 22 #9
struggle4progress Aug 22 #7
struggle4progress Aug 22 #8
Fullduplexxx Aug 23 #10

Response to Thomas Hurt (Original post)

Sun Aug 22, 2021, 08:27 PM

1. If and when she is charged with anything, he'll fold like the cheap-assed pillows he sells.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Thomas Hurt (Original post)

Sun Aug 22, 2021, 08:34 PM

2. Great. Indict the little pillow huckster.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Thomas Hurt (Original post)

Sun Aug 22, 2021, 08:35 PM

3. I would suggest to the police

that they look under the bed

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Thomas Hurt (Original post)

Sun Aug 22, 2021, 08:44 PM

4. Mein Pillow Guy, One Smart Criminal

‘Sequestered in an out-of-state "safe house".’ She's a backwoods county clerk who illegally copied data from elections machines, and shared that data, along with passwords for the machines, with far-right disinformation outlets with the intention of advancing the bogus claims of election fraud. As such, the FBI would like to speak with her. That's not a situation that calls for fleeing the state to hide out in a safe house provided by a delusional pillow magnate.

AND Unexplainable flight can be admissible evidence of conscious awareness of guilt, as are many other ‘process crimes’ (quotes for emphasis not minimization, throwing sand in the ref’s eyes is a stand-alone offense, i.e., Manafort, Stone, Nixon) like destroying evidence, suborning perjury, witness tampering, jury tampering. The cover-up can be worse than the crime. Just another form of cheating. Rotten fuckers.

AND No privilege for any communications between these brainless twits, and hiding witnesses, much less possible felons, runs afoul of many statutes, Federal and state. Are others involved? Then you have a conspiracy to violate these laws. And ignorance (no matter how fucking stupid the perpetrator may be) is no defense.

Oh yeah, crossing state lines in the course of carrying out a crime, or furthering a conspiracy? Add another count to the indictment.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Deacon Blue (Reply #4)

Sun Aug 22, 2021, 09:21 PM

5. the obvious charges....

Obstruction of justice and aiding and abetting a fugitive. He could also face charges of conspiracy after the fact.

Assuming of course there is a warrant out for her arrest. But it's not a smart move even if she is wanted for questioning.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Thomas Hurt (Original post)

Sun Aug 22, 2021, 09:31 PM

6. Because crossing state lines is always a smart choice when faced with criminal charges.

The FBI tends to take note of that kind of thing.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to crickets (Reply #6)

Sun Aug 22, 2021, 10:53 PM

9. Let her ass sit in jail while they figure it out.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Thomas Hurt (Original post)

Sun Aug 22, 2021, 10:49 PM

7. 18 USC 1073

Whoever moves or travels in interstate .. commerce with intent either (1) to avoid prosecution, or custody or confinement after conviction, under the laws of the place from which he flees, for a crime, or an attempt to commit a crime, punishable by death or which is a felony under the laws of the place from which the fugitive flees, or (2) to avoid giving testimony in any criminal proceedings in such place in which the commission of an offense punishable by death or which is a felony under the laws of such place, is charged, or (3) to avoid service of, or contempt proceedings for alleged disobedience of, lawful process requiring attendance and the giving of testimony or the production of documentary evidence before an agency of a State empowered by the law of such State to conduct investigations of alleged criminal activities, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both ... https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1073

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Thomas Hurt (Original post)

Sun Aug 22, 2021, 10:51 PM

8. 18 USC 3

Whoever, knowing that an offense against the United States has been committed, receives, relieves, comforts or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact.

Except as otherwise expressly provided by any Act of Congress, an accessory after the fact shall be imprisoned not more than one-half the maximum term of imprisonment or (notwithstanding section 3571) fined not more than one-half the maximum fine prescribed for the punishment of the principal, or both; or if the principal is punishable by life imprisonment or death, the accessory shall be imprisoned not more than 15 years.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/3

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Thomas Hurt (Original post)

Mon Aug 23, 2021, 06:36 AM

10. And nothing will be done about it

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread