Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Soph0571

(9,685 posts)
Mon Sep 13, 2021, 07:18 AM Sep 2021

Barrett concerned about public perception of Supreme Court

Because of course she is. 👀

Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett expressed concerns Sunday that the public may increasingly see the court as a partisan institution.

Justices must be “hyper vigilant to make sure they’re not letting personal biases creep into their decisions, since judges are people, too,” Barrett said at a lecture hosted by the University of Louisville’s McConnell Center.

Introduced by Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell who founded the center and played a key role in pushing through her confirmation in the last days of the Trump administration, Barrett spoke at length about her desire for others to see the Supreme Court as nonpartisan.

[link:https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/mitch-mcconnell-republican-university-of-louisville-joe-biden-senate-b1918873.html|]

Sure Jan

So Texas and the like were not the plan all along? Right? Is the new definition of non partisan under his eye?



Meanwhile...



Can you have a non partisan theocracy!?!?! Heh.

59 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Barrett concerned about public perception of Supreme Court (Original Post) Soph0571 Sep 2021 OP
The Cultist speaks n/t Casady1 Sep 2021 #1
You should try some self-reflection, Amy. GoCubsGo Sep 2021 #2
That's like an exterminator being concerned that cockroaches might not approve of his profession n/t DFW Sep 2021 #3
Very well said, DFW Diamond_Dog Sep 2021 #8
Ding! Ding! Ding! Raster Sep 2021 #21
I can't believe she has the gall to say what she said. nt leftyladyfrommo Sep 2021 #4
Pretty Amazing Gaslighting there, Madam. vanlassie Sep 2021 #5
Newspeak. Scrivener7 Sep 2021 #6
RWers beliefs are so warp . . . Lovie777 Sep 2021 #7
Bull Dr. Shepper Sep 2021 #9
Is she legitimate? Should her spot on the SC come with an asterisk? Buckeyeblue Sep 2021 #10
When you agree to go against rulings by using excuses instead of laws, duforsure Sep 2021 #11
This is exactly what we said she would do. Iggo Sep 2021 #54
Under His Eye obamanut2012 Sep 2021 #12
Exactly. MuseRider Sep 2021 #13
Aunt Lydia indeed. bamagal62 Sep 2021 #14
I had to look up Aunt Lydia underpants Sep 2021 #20
The TV show is great MuseRider Sep 2021 #42
I did catch one recently underpants Sep 2021 #46
It is a pretty clever show. MuseRider Sep 2021 #48
Yes, she has to obey him obamanut2012 Sep 2021 #58
Amy, you remind me of Jesse Helms. Chipper Chat Sep 2021 #15
What? They don't want to be known as 3Hotdogs Sep 2021 #16
Racists aren't pre-judging, white supremacy isn't an opinion lindysalsagal Sep 2021 #24
Pathetic. Time to expand SCROTUS to 13. lagomorph777 Sep 2021 #17
...said the arsonist/firefighter. FM123 Sep 2021 #18
Actions speak louder than words. bluesbassman Sep 2021 #19
I am pretty sure that ship can no longer be found in the harbor. nt Gore1FL Sep 2021 #22
Susan Collins level of "concern" Mad_Machine76 Sep 2021 #23
The stench of overweened haughtiness bucolic_frolic Sep 2021 #25
Abortion funds in Texas as well as the Physicians for Reproductive Health have recommended not WhiskeyGrinder Sep 2021 #26
Did they explain their logic? plimsoll Sep 2021 #43
Mainly because Black people, people of color, disabled people, trans people and other marginalized WhiskeyGrinder Sep 2021 #44
Fair enough. plimsoll Sep 2021 #45
Yet another hamfisted rightwing PR ploy C_U_L8R Sep 2021 #27
Now, now, don't get upset Farmer-Rick Sep 2021 #28
But is it a Susan Collins Level of Concern? yellowcanine Sep 2021 #29
Echoing Roberts and hoping for a future Chief Justice slot bucolic_frolic Sep 2021 #30
If she were truly worried... 2naSalit Sep 2021 #31
The Susan Collins of the Court rpannier Sep 2021 #32
The gaslighting continues. Accuse the "other side" of doing what you have done. Midnight Writer Sep 2021 #33
that's because it is a partisan institution. Putting a "royal court" overseeing, undermining yaesu Sep 2021 #34
Too Late. BlueIdaho Sep 2021 #35
I can see the next Borowitz or Onion headline now. iscooterliberally Sep 2021 #36
If she were truely concerned about the "public perception" of the Court randr Sep 2021 #37
My thoughts exactly drmeow Sep 2021 #51
Our problem is that we're not using the correct framing argument. plimsoll Sep 2021 #38
Tell me Beer Boy and Thomas aren't partisan hacks. CanonRay Sep 2021 #39
If your decisions violate natural justice... MrModerate Sep 2021 #40
Imagine that! kskiska Sep 2021 #41
Jaime Harrison's response FelineOverlord Sep 2021 #47
Lying for Jesus. cbabe Sep 2021 #49
Want the court to be less political, Amy? Mr.Bill Sep 2021 #50
That's rich. (n/t) Iggo Sep 2021 #52
She realizes they just rubber stamped abortion bounty hunters, right? Vinca Sep 2021 #53
Ah, yes - and up next, the timeless GOP bullshit: "We need better messaging!" hatrack Sep 2021 #55
Uh huh mvd Sep 2021 #56
Then Barrett should resign and encourage several other Justices PufPuf23 Sep 2021 #57
Bwahahahahahaaa! spanone Sep 2021 #59

GoCubsGo

(32,075 posts)
2. You should try some self-reflection, Amy.
Mon Sep 13, 2021, 07:24 AM
Sep 2021

Or, do you really think your shit don't stink?

She's got to be the most stupid, unqualified person to sit on that court in many decades. She has no fucking business there. But, I'm sure all y'all knew that already.

DFW

(54,302 posts)
3. That's like an exterminator being concerned that cockroaches might not approve of his profession n/t
Mon Sep 13, 2021, 07:28 AM
Sep 2021

Lovie777

(12,218 posts)
7. RWers beliefs are so warp . . .
Mon Sep 13, 2021, 07:46 AM
Sep 2021

they honesty believe they are the heroes of mankind through their effed up religion.

Buckeyeblue

(5,499 posts)
10. Is she legitimate? Should her spot on the SC come with an asterisk?
Mon Sep 13, 2021, 07:55 AM
Sep 2021

I sort of think that about all the Trump nominees. I have a hard time accepting a president that didn't win the popular vote.

duforsure

(11,885 posts)
11. When you agree to go against rulings by using excuses instead of laws,
Mon Sep 13, 2021, 08:05 AM
Sep 2021

To overturn rights of women, you lost all credibility, and you are a very partisan hack working for wealthy people's interest, not us. Your legacy is shxt now. This will follow you forever.

Iggo

(47,537 posts)
54. This is exactly what we said she would do.
Mon Sep 13, 2021, 08:20 PM
Sep 2021

I didn’t think it would happen this fast and definitely not this easily.

But this is what she was put there for. 🤬

MuseRider

(34,095 posts)
13. Exactly.
Mon Sep 13, 2021, 08:31 AM
Sep 2021

Isn't her husband the one who makes the decisions for her? I recall a discussion about how her specific little cult works and that is exactly what she said. She is under his eye and she is putting us right there with her. Only difference is she approves of the men being in charge, we do not. She is an Aunt Lydia.

MuseRider

(34,095 posts)
42. The TV show is great
Mon Sep 13, 2021, 10:20 AM
Sep 2021

but the book is exceptional. If you love to read I think you might enjoy it. Her writing is lovely, descriptive but not overblown at all.

Every one of the books she has written have become books to re-read. There is a nice trilogy that is really good.

I think, just from the little I know you from years here on DU, that you would probably like her work, especially if you like to read or listen to audiobooks.

underpants

(182,632 posts)
46. I did catch one recently
Mon Sep 13, 2021, 12:06 PM
Sep 2021

Joseph Lawrence is in a holding cell. In comes a young guy ( don’t know the characters name) who is part of the powers that be.

Lawrence: “I hear I had a trial”
Guy: “You did”
Lawrence “How did I do?”

I cracked up.

MuseRider

(34,095 posts)
48. It is a pretty clever show.
Mon Sep 13, 2021, 02:20 PM
Sep 2021

I have not seen the last season, waiting until I am less likely to throw things (perhaps I may not ever see it). I think the first two seasons were very well done.

Funny tidbit about when I read the book. We were on our last evening on a short vacation and I got brutally sick with one of the worst colds I have ever had. Before dinner I was laying in bed reading this book and my husband had fallen asleep when on the TV came Crossfire with Jon Stewart. The infamous episode. Just something I remember and these days I have to remind myself now and again to remember them. Getting old sucks!

obamanut2012

(26,047 posts)
58. Yes, she has to obey him
Tue Sep 14, 2021, 07:36 AM
Sep 2021

Including SCOTUS decisions.

Oh, she isn't Aunt Lydia at all, her status is much, much higher, and the Aunts aren't married. She is Serena Joy Waterford.

Chipper Chat

(9,673 posts)
15. Amy, you remind me of Jesse Helms.
Mon Sep 13, 2021, 08:57 AM
Sep 2021

His spokesman declared on TV that
"JESSE DOES NOT HAvE A BIGOTED BONE IN HIS BODY.
.
Ah, yes. Sure..

lindysalsagal

(20,592 posts)
24. Racists aren't pre-judging, white supremacy isn't an opinion
Mon Sep 13, 2021, 09:31 AM
Sep 2021

It's a fact. So, she truly thinks she's aligned with morality, and is probably surprised there is any dissent. Let them eat cake.

bluesbassman

(19,361 posts)
19. Actions speak louder than words.
Mon Sep 13, 2021, 09:21 AM
Sep 2021

“The lady doth protest too much, methinks” was never more appropriate than to this drivel.

WhiskeyGrinder

(22,309 posts)
26. Abortion funds in Texas as well as the Physicians for Reproductive Health have recommended not
Mon Sep 13, 2021, 09:34 AM
Sep 2021

using "Handmaid's Tale" language and imagery to describe what's going on in Texas.

plimsoll

(1,668 posts)
43. Did they explain their logic?
Mon Sep 13, 2021, 10:31 AM
Sep 2021

It does seem a little hyperbolic, but I'm curious to know why. From my perspective I'm torn between a witch hunt (overused and rendered non-sensical by conservatives and TFG) and instituting a Stasi like regimen to make sure some parts of the population adhere to proper doctrine.

WhiskeyGrinder

(22,309 posts)
44. Mainly because Black people, people of color, disabled people, trans people and other marginalized
Mon Sep 13, 2021, 11:01 AM
Sep 2021

people have been living this reality for decades on this continent, and saying that NOW it's "The Handmaid's Tale" says "we care now because a lot more cishet white women are affected." THT is a white-centered book in itself, which reinforces that none of these issues are important until they affect white-middle class women (who, incidentally, are some of the new law's strongest supporters). We don't need to embrace that cruel reality to be effective against these laws.

plimsoll

(1,668 posts)
45. Fair enough.
Mon Sep 13, 2021, 11:13 AM
Sep 2021

The vigilante aspect of it disturbed me quite a bit. It reminded me of the private slave bounty hunters in pre-civil war era, a way to make money and be a vindictive prick at the same time. It does seem like the perfect GOP response.

C_U_L8R

(44,992 posts)
27. Yet another hamfisted rightwing PR ploy
Mon Sep 13, 2021, 09:36 AM
Sep 2021

They always say this shit to appear 'reasonable' right before they do something truly awful. Lather rinse repeat.

Farmer-Rick

(10,140 posts)
28. Now, now, don't get upset
Mon Sep 13, 2021, 09:37 AM
Sep 2021

She's just saying what her master/husband told her to say. You know the slave/wife has no opions of her own.

The Dancing Supremes have been considered a partisan junta for the filthy rich ever since they voted in W. They came right out and told us votes do Not count.

Now they are just playing around with the details of how unimportant we really are to them.

The constitution never gave the supremes the power to determine constitutionality of laws. They gave themselves that power and are now using it to blugeon the citizenry into submission.

bucolic_frolic

(43,064 posts)
30. Echoing Roberts and hoping for a future Chief Justice slot
Mon Sep 13, 2021, 09:44 AM
Sep 2021

It's all a game plan to them. Learn to read the tea leaves.

2naSalit

(86,365 posts)
31. If she were truly worried...
Mon Sep 13, 2021, 09:44 AM
Sep 2021

She'd see that she is part of the taint on the court and resign.

Nothing less will do so c'mon , Amy, show us that you really care and resign.

yaesu

(8,020 posts)
34. that's because it is a partisan institution. Putting a "royal court" overseeing, undermining
Mon Sep 13, 2021, 09:57 AM
Sep 2021

our elected government was a stupid fucking mistake. Congress just couldn't quite let go of that king and queen thingy.

iscooterliberally

(2,860 posts)
36. I can see the next Borowitz or Onion headline now.
Mon Sep 13, 2021, 10:01 AM
Sep 2021

Susan Collins sues Amy Coney Barrett for copy write infringement.

randr

(12,409 posts)
37. If she were truely concerned about the "public perception" of the Court
Mon Sep 13, 2021, 10:10 AM
Sep 2021

She would resign immediately and let Biden balance the scales.

drmeow

(5,013 posts)
51. My thoughts exactly
Mon Sep 13, 2021, 04:53 PM
Sep 2021

Both she and Gorsuch should resign (Kavanaugh should be impeached and given jail time for lying to Congress)

plimsoll

(1,668 posts)
38. Our problem is that we're not using the correct framing argument.
Mon Sep 13, 2021, 10:15 AM
Sep 2021

Partisan == Democrat or Liberal

By definition conservatives are not partisan. Therefor those hard right GOP justices are not partisan, it's all the rest of them. When Democrats or liberals think the hard right GOP justices are partisan it's because the Democrats and liberals are the real partisans.

Please note: delivered at a partisan facility, at the request of probably the most extreme partisan senate leader in over a century, to a partisan crowd. She wasn't trying to convince us, she was re-affirming the hard right GOP world view. We're just a bunch of dirty Democrat liberals.

cbabe

(3,513 posts)
49. Lying for Jesus.
Mon Sep 13, 2021, 02:25 PM
Sep 2021

It's a thing.

The chosen can safely ignore the #9th commandment cause they are the blessed who know the mind of god.


Vinca

(50,237 posts)
53. She realizes they just rubber stamped abortion bounty hunters, right?
Mon Sep 13, 2021, 05:19 PM
Sep 2021

Maybe the woman is just as dim and foggy as the rest of the right wingers. She's gone into Louie Gohmert territory with this statement.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Barrett concerned about p...