They sure as fuck better have a subpoena with Sydney Powells name on it.....

[Nevilledog]

Link to tweet

Tweet text:
Ron Filipkowski
@RonFilipkowski
This new interview by Powell is interesting. It suggests that the purpose of the insurrection was to DELAY the electoral college certification to give Alito time to intervene on this legal challenge. But, Powell says they didn’t anticipate Pelosi reconvening Congress that day.


7:52 PM · Sep 25, 2021

[NanceGreggs]

1. As has been proven time and again ...

... believing a single word this woman says is tantamount to being just as deranged as she is.

[blm]

2. ✔️

Make Alito have to deny it publicly….at least.

[NanceGreggs]

6. No Alito fan here ...

... but why should he have to 'publicly deny' the insane ramblings of a pathological liar? Indeed, why should anyone?

This woman repeatedly lied to judges in courts of law - and will likely be disbarred as a result.

Remember that her defense was and is that "no reasonable person" would believe her crackpot conspiracy theories, which she continues to spew.

[StarfishSaver]

8. +1000

[blm]

11. Showing my age. 😉 Refers to Lyndon Johnson.

Johnson 1972 when he wanted it spread that his opponent had sex with pigs, 'I just wanted to hear the sonofabitch deny it'. Or something close to that.

[Nevilledog]

4. She is proud of trying to overthrow the government.

She doesn't think she did anything wrong, which makes her more likely to spill the beans.

[ShazzieB]

16. I really wish they'd hurry up and disbarred her already.

It's downright scary that an irresponsible, possibly deranged, pathological liar like this is still allowed to practice law in this country

[Kablooie]

3. So do they subpoena Alito now?

Sending a hoard of rioters into the Capitol to threaten to kill politicians was obviously just a modest plan to delay the certification.
Anybody else would have done the same.

And now Justice Alito may be drawn into the morass. Whoopee!

[StarfishSaver]

9. No.

There is no more reason to subpoena a Supreme Court Justice to refute the delusional rantings of a crazy, lying woman than a delusional man in Lafayette Park babbling that the president ordered microchips implanted into his buttcheeks would justify hauling Joe Biden in to swear under oath that it never happened.

[OrangeJoe]

14. Powell's ravings

This woman just spouts off legal sounding mumbo jumbo that means nothing. She sounds like a "sovereign citizen" jibbering about Admiralty Court and filing liens against property. I can't wait for Dominion's suit to finally get to court and take everything she's got.

[rsdsharp]

5. So Nancy Pelosi "sped up" convening Congress?

Congress convened on January 3rd as is required by the 20th Amendment of the Constitution. Even Trump knew the counting of the electoral votes was set for January 6th. He told his thugs to be there; “it will be wild.”

[Celerity]

7. no, she means after the attempted coup

[msongs]

10. way to go nancy nt

[Wingus Dingus]

12. She assumed Nancy would cower in fear and send everyone home?

Ha ha ha haha... yeah no.

[PoliticAverse]

13. Why? You haven't figured out Powell is simply a bullshit artist?

She just makes stuff up.

[DanieRains]

15. I Am Sure Her Lying About Election Fraud Is A Crime Almost Everywhere

Felony.

She belongs behind bars.

Going to court and claiming there was fraud when there is proof she knew she was lying is against the law.

[NJCher]

17. Wasn't this theory

Batted around prior to the election? And if I’m correct on that, it was discounted as a possible scenario because it would not make it to the Senate.

My memory is bad, though; I could be confused.

One thing that I am not confused about is that this woman is a nut case and runs her mouth just to be running her mouth..

[Skittles]

18. simply don't JAV with the 12th Amendment

ugh